logo

SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 50 , Issue 9 : 1345(2020) https://doi.org/10.1360/SSI-2020-0211

Knowledge-driven process industry smart manufacturing

More info
  • ReceivedJul 10, 2020
  • AcceptedAug 28, 2020
  • PublishedSep 22, 2020

Abstract


Funded by

国家自然科学基金(61988101,61773405)

山东省重大科技创新工程项目(2019JZZY020123)


References

[1] Chai T. Industrial process control systems: research status and development direction. Sci Sin-Inf, 2016, 46: 1003-1015 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] Qian F, Gui W H. Boosting optimization and upgrade for manufacturing industry by artificial intelligence. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2018, 3: 257-261. Google Scholar

[3] Gui W H, Wang C H, Xie Y F, et al. The necessary way to realize great-leap-forward development of process industries. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2015, 5: 337-342. Google Scholar

[4] Lee J, Singh J, Azamfar M, et al. Industrial AI: A systematic framework for AI in industrial applications. Zhongguo Jixie Gongcheng/China Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 31(1): 37-48. Google Scholar

[5] Ding J L, Yang C E, Chen Y D, et al. Research progress and prospects of intelligent optimization decision making in complex industrial process. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2018, 44(11): 1931-1943. Google Scholar

[6] Wang Y. Research on production planning and scheduling under uncertainty. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2016. Google Scholar

[7] Qian F, Du W L, Zhong W M, et al. Problems and challenges of smart optimization manufacturing in petrochemical industries. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43(6): 893-901. Google Scholar

[8] Sun C Y, Zhou J W. Smart and optimal manufacturing development strategy for mineral processing industry. Nonferrous Metals (Mineral Processing Section), 2019, 5: 1-5. Google Scholar

[9] Cai T Y, Ding J L, Gui W H, et al. Research on the development strategy of big data and manufacturing process knowledge automation. China Science Press, 2019. Google Scholar

[10] Gui W H, Yue W C, Xie Y F, et al. Review of intelligent optimal manufacturing for aluminum reduction production. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2018, 44(11): 39-52. Google Scholar

[11] Wang F Y. The destiny: towards knowledge au-tomation--preface of the special issue for the 50th anniver-sary of Acta Automatica Sinica. Acta Automatica Sin, 2013, 39: 1741-1743 CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Xie Y, Gui W, Yang C. Knowledge automation and its industrial application. Sci Sin-Inf, 2016, 46: 1016-1034 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Park H, Jung J Y. SAX-ARM: Deviant event pattern discovery from multivariate time series using symbolic aggregate approximation and association rule mining. Expert Syst Appl, 2020, 141: 112950 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Zhang B, Yang C, Zhu H. Controllable-Domain-Based Fuzzy Rule Extraction for Copper Removal Process Control. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 2018, 26: 1744-1756 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Yang C, Zhou L, Huang K. Multimode process monitoring based on robust dictionary learning with application to aluminium electrolysis process. Neurocomputing, 2019, 332: 305-319 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Wang H, Lin N, Jing S. Supporting knowledge uncertainty engineering-knowledge acquisition. Computer Integrated Manufacturing System, 2015, 21(10): 2558-2563 DOI: 10.13196/j.cims.2015.10.002. Google Scholar

[17] Xie S, Xie Y, Huang T. Generalized Predictive Control for Industrial Processes Based on Neuron Adaptive Splitting and Merging RBF Neural Network. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2019, 66: 1192-1202 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Martinsen K, Downey J, Baturynska I. Human-Machine Interface for Artificial Neural Network Based Machine Tool Process Monitoring. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 41: 933-938 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Huang Z, Yang C, Chen X. Adaptive over-sampling method for classification with application to imbalanced datasets in aluminum electrolysis. Neural Comput Applic, 2020, 32: 7183-7199 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Bi W, Dandy G C, Maier H R. Improved genetic algorithm optimization of water distribution system design by incorporating domain knowledge. Environ Model Software, 2015, 69: 370-381 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Roldan Reyes E, Negny S, Cortes Robles G. Improvement of online adaptation knowledge acquisition and reuse in case-based reasoning: Application to process engineering design. Eng Appl Artificial Intelligence, 2015, 41: 1-16 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Rintala L, Leikola M, Sauer C. Designing gold extraction processes: Performance study of a case-based reasoning system. Miner Eng, 2017, 109: 42-53 CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Gao Z, Cecati C, Ding S. A Survey of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Techniques Part II: Fault Diagnosis with Knowledge-Based and Hybrid/Active Approaches. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2015, : 1-1 CrossRef Google Scholar

[24] Kamsu-Foguem B, Rigal F, Mauget F. Mining association rules for the quality improvement of the production process. Expert Syst Appl, 2013, 40: 1034-1045 CrossRef Google Scholar

[25] Yu X, Huang D, Jiang Y. Iterative learning belief rule-base inference methodology using evidential reasoning for delayed coking unit. Control Eng Practice, 2012, 20: 1005-1015 CrossRef Google Scholar

[26] Yue W, Gui W, Chen X. A Data and Knowledge Collaboration Strategy for Decision-Making on the Amount of Aluminum Fluoride Addition Based on Augmented Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Engineering, 2019, 5: 1060-1076 CrossRef Google Scholar

[27] Lima N M N, Li?an L Z, Manenti F. Fuzzy cognitive approach of a molecular distillation process. Chem Eng Res Des, 2011, 89: 471-479 CrossRef Google Scholar

[28] Dong C, Zhou Z, Zhang Q. Cubic Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph: A New Methodology for Modeling and Reasoning About Complex Faults With Negative Feedbacks. IEEE Trans Rel, 2018, 67: 920-932 CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Li L, Yue W. Dynamic uncertain causality graph based on Intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to root cause analysis. Appl Intell, 2020, 50: 241-255 CrossRef Google Scholar

[30] Wang W M, Peng X, Zhu G. Dynamic representation of fuzzy knowledge based on fuzzy petri net and genetic-particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl, 2014, 41: 1369-1376 CrossRef Google Scholar

[31] Zhang Y, Luo X, Buis J J. LCA-oriented semantic representation for the product life cycle. J Cleaner Production, 2015, 86: 146-162 CrossRef Google Scholar

[32] Terletskyi D. Inheritance in object-oriented knowledge representation. In: Information and Software technologies. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2015. 293--305. Google Scholar

[33] Minsky M. A framework for representing knowledge. Readings Cognition Science, 1974, 76: 156-189 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6089. Google Scholar

[34] Yue W, Chen X, Gui W. A knowledge reasoning Fuzzy-Bayesian network for root cause analysis of abnormal aluminum electrolysis cell condition. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2017, 11: 414-428 CrossRef Google Scholar

[35] Diallo T M L, Henry S, Ouzrout Y. Bayesian Network Building for Diagnosis in Industrial Domain based on Expert Knowledge and Unitary Traceability Data. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2015, 48: 2411-2416 CrossRef Google Scholar

[36] Yan A, Wang W, Zhang C. A fault prediction method that uses improved case-based reasoning to continuously predict the status of a shaft furnace. Inf Sci, 2014, 259: 269-281 CrossRef Google Scholar

[37] Han M, Cao Z J. An improved case-based reasoning method and its application in endpoint prediction of basic oxygen furnace. Neurocomputing, 2015, 149: 1245-1252 CrossRef Google Scholar

[38] Ding J, Cao Y, Mpofu E. A hybrid support vector machine and fuzzy reasoning based fault diagnosis and rescue system for stable glutamate fermentation. Chem Eng Res Des, 2012, 90: 1197-1207 CrossRef Google Scholar

[39] Cao D, Zeng S, Li J. Variable universe fuzzy expert system for aluminum electrolysis. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2011, 21: 429-436 CrossRef Google Scholar

[40] Maji P, Garai P. IT2 Fuzzy-Rough Sets and Max Relevance-Max Significance Criterion for Attribute Selection. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2015, 45: 1657-1668 CrossRef Google Scholar

[41] Yue W, Gui W, Chen X. Knowledge representation and reasoning using self-learning interval type-2 fuzzy Petri nets and extended TOPSIS. Int J Mach Learn Cyber, 2019, 10: 3499-3520 CrossRef Google Scholar

[42] Roda F, Musulin E. An ontology-based framework to support intelligent data analysis of sensor measurements. Expert Syst Appl, 2014, 41: 7914-7926 CrossRef Google Scholar

[43] Bollacker K, Evans C, Paritosh P, et al. Freebase: A collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. New York: ACM Press, 2008. 1247--1250. Google Scholar

[44] Auer S, Bizer C, Kobilarov G, et al. DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference. Berlin: Springer, 2007. 722--735. Google Scholar

[45] Bizer C, Lehmann J, Kobilarov G. DBpedia - A crystallization point for the Web of Data. J Web Semantics, 2009, 7: 154-165 CrossRef Google Scholar

[46] Suchanek F M, Kasneci G, Weikum G, et al. Yago: A core of semantic knowledge. The web conference, 2007. 697-706 https://doi.org/10.1145/1242572.1242667. Google Scholar

[47] Hoffart J, Suchanek F M, Berberich K. YAGO2: A spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia. Artificial Intelligence, 2013, 194: 28-61 CrossRef Google Scholar

[48] Mahdisoltani F, Biega J, Suchanek F. Yago3: a knowledge base from multilingual Wikipedias. In: Proceedings of the 7th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR), 2014. Google Scholar

[49] Lenat D B. CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Commun ACM, 1995, 38: 33-38 CrossRef Google Scholar

[50] Speer R, Havasi C. Representing general relational knowledge in ConceptNet 5. Language Resources and Evaluation, 2012. 3679--3686. Google Scholar

[51] Speer R, Chin J, Havasi C. ConceptNet 5.5: An open multilingual graph of general knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017. 4444--4451. Google Scholar

[52] Gallagher B. Matching structure and semantics: a survey on graph-based pattern matching. AAAI FS, 2006, 6: 45--53. Google Scholar

[53] Wylot M, Hauswirth M, Cudré-Mauroux P. RDF Data Storage and Query Processing Schemes. ACM Comput Surv, 2018, 51: 1-36 CrossRef Google Scholar

[54] The Neo4j Team. The Neo4j Manual v3.4. 2018. https://neo4j.com/docs/developer-manual/current/. Google Scholar

[55] Angles R, Arenas M, Barceló P. G-CORE: a core for future graph query languages. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data. Houston: ACM, 2018. 1421--1432. Google Scholar

[56] Jang S, Megawati M, Choi J, et al. Semi-automatic quality assessment of linked data without requiring ontology. In: Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2015. 45--55. Google Scholar

[57] Wang W Y, Mazaitis K, Lao N. Efficient inference and learning in a large knowledge base. Mach Learn, 2015, 100: 101-126 CrossRef Google Scholar

[58] Pujara J, Miao H, Getoor L, et al. Knowledge graph identification. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Semantic Web Conference. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2013. 542--557. Google Scholar

[59] Chen Y, Goldberg S, Wang D Z, et al. Ontological pathfinding: mining first-order knowledge from large knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. New York: ACM Press, 2016. 835--846. Google Scholar

[60] Jiang T, Liu T, Ge T, et al. Towards time-aware knowledge graph completion. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2016. 1715--1724. Google Scholar

[61] Tay Y, Luu A T, Hui S C. Non-parametric estimation of multiple embeddings for link prediction on dynamic knowledge graphs. In: Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park: AAAI, 2017. 1243--1249. Google Scholar

[62] Feng J, Huang M, Yang Y, et al. GAKE: Graph aware knowledge embedding. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2016. 641--651. Google Scholar

[63] Shi B, Weninger T. ProjE: embedding projection for knowledge graph completion. In: Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, 2017. 1236--1242. Google Scholar

[64] Graves A, Wayne G, Reynolds M. Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory. Nature, 2016, 538: 471-476 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[65] Schlichtkrull M S, Kipf T, Bloem P, et al. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of European Semantic Web Conference, 2018. 593--607. Google Scholar

[66] Yang F, Yang Z, Cohen W W, et al. Differentiable learning of logical rules for knowledge base reasoning. In: Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017. 2316--2325. Google Scholar

[67] Guan S P, Jin X L, Jia Y T, et al. Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph: A survey. Ruan Jian XueBao/Journal of Software, 2018, 29(10): 2966-2994. Google Scholar

[68] Du Z, Meng X, Wang S. Research progress of large-scale knowledge graph completion technology. Sci Sin-Inf, 2020, 50: 551-575 CrossRef Google Scholar

[69] Huang D X, Jiang Y H, Jin Y H. Present research situation, major bottlenecks, and prospect of reflnery industry process control. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43(6): 902- 916. Google Scholar

[70] Zeng Z, Gui W, Chen X. A mechanism knowledge-driven method for identifying the pseudo dissolution hysteresis coefficient in the industrial aluminium electrolysis process. Control Eng Practice, 2020, 102: 104533 CrossRef Google Scholar