SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 50 , Issue 4 : 527-539(2020) https://doi.org/10.1360/SSI-2019-0232

Data-driven multimodal operation monitoring and fault diagnosis of high-speed train bearings

More info
  • ReceivedOct 18, 2019
  • AcceptedJan 24, 2020
  • PublishedApr 13, 2020


Funded by





[1] Randall R B. Vibration-based condition monitoring: industrial, aerospace and automotive applications. Mechanisms Machine Science, 2011, 3: 431--477. Google Scholar

[2] Yi C, Lin J, Zhang W. Faults Diagnostics of Railway Axle Bearings Based on IMF's Confidence Index Algorithm for Ensemble EMD.. Sensors, 2015, 15: 10991-11011 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[3] Henao H, Kia S H, Capolino G A. Torsional-Vibration Assessment and Gear-Fault Diagnosis in Railway Traction System. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2011, 58: 1707-1717 CrossRef Google Scholar

[4] Sha M Y, Liu L G. Summary of bearing fault diagnosis technology based on vibration signal. Bearing, 2015, 9: 59--63. Google Scholar

[5] Yi C, Liu L, Lin J, et al. Quantizing the health state of railway axle bearing via signal-to-noise ratio defined by EEMD and SVD. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM), Seattle, 2018. 1--7. Google Scholar

[6] P?aczek M, Kokot G. Modelling and Laboratory Tests of the Temperature Influence on the Efficiency of the Energy Harvesting System Based on MFC Piezoelectric Transducers.. Sensors, 2019, 19: 1558-1748 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[7] Li J, Li M, Zhang J. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on time-delayed feedback monostable stochastic resonance and adaptive minimum entropy deconvolution. J Sound Vib, 2017, 401: 139-151 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[8] Harkat M F, Mourot G, Ragot J. Sensor failure detection of air quality monitoring network. IFAC Proc Vol, 2000, 33: 529--534. Google Scholar

[9] Kourti T, Macgregor J F. Process analysis, monitoring and diagnosis, using multivariate projection methods. Chemometrics Intell Lab Syst, 1995, 28: 3--21. Google Scholar

[10] Kourti T, Macgregor J F. Recent developments in multivariate SPC methods for monitoring and diagnosing process and product performance. J Qual Tech, 1996, 4: 409--428. Google Scholar

[11] Wang X, Kruger U, Irwin G W. Nonlinear PCA With the Local Approach for Diesel Engine Fault Detection and Diagnosis. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2008, 16: 122-129 CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Hamadache M, Lee D. Improving signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for inchoate fault detection based on principal component analysis (PCA). In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2014), 2014. Google Scholar

[13] Garcia-Alvarez D, Fuente M J, Sainz G I. Fault detection and isolation in transient states using principal component analysis. J Process Control, 2012, 22: 551-563 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Benaicha A, Mourot G, Benothman K. Determination of principal component analysis models for sensor fault detection and isolation. Int J Control Autom Syst, 2013, 11: 296-305 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] MacGregor J F, Jaeckle C, Kiparissides C. Process monitoring and diagnosis by multiblock PLS methods. AIChE J, 1994, 40: 826-838 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Liu Q, Fang T, Dong Y N, et al. Dynamic modeling and reconstruction based fault detection and diagnosis of train bearings. Acta Autom Sin, 2019, 45: 2233--2241. Google Scholar

[17] Dong Y N, Qin S J. Dynamic-inner canonical correlation and causality analysis for high dimensional time series data. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, 51: 476--481. Google Scholar

[18] Dong Y, Qin S J. Dynamic latent variable analytics for process operations and control. Comput Chem Eng, 2018, 114: 69-80 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Hartigan J A, Wong M A. A K-means clustering algorithm. Appl Stat, 2013, 28: 100--108. Google Scholar

[20] Karypis G, Eui-Hong Han G, Kumar V. Chameleon: hierarchical clustering using dynamic modeling. Computer, 1999, 32: 68-75 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Zhao S J, Zhang J, Xu Y M. Monitoring of Processes with Multiple Operating Modes through Multiple Principle Component Analysis Models. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2004, 43: 7025-7035 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Zhao C, Wang F, Lu N. Stage-based soft-transition multiple PCA modeling and on-line monitoring strategy for batch processes. J Process Control, 2007, 17: 728-741 CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Yao Y, Gao F. Phase and transition based batch process modeling and online monitoring. J Process Control, 2009, 19: 816-826 CrossRef Google Scholar

[24] Pang X S. The methods of comparison of missing data processing. Stat Dec, 2010, 2010: 152--155. Google Scholar

[25] Deshpande A, Dong Y N, Li G, et al. US Patent, US20160179599A1, 2016-06-23. Google Scholar

[26] Ku W, Storer R H, Georgakis C. Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis. Chemometrics Intelligent Laboratory Syst, 1995, 30: 179-196 CrossRef Google Scholar

[27] Lennart L. System Identification: Theory for the User. Upper Saddle River: PTR Prentice Hall, 1999. 9--11. Google Scholar

[28] Candès E J, Li X, Ma Y. Robust principal component analysis?. J ACM, 2011, 58: 1-37 CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Berndt D J, Clifford J. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. Seattle, 1994. Google Scholar

[30] Dong Y, Qin S J. A novel dynamic PCA algorithm for dynamic data modeling and process monitoring. J Process Control, 2018, 67: 1-11 CrossRef Google Scholar

[31] Yue H, Qin S J. Reconstruction-based fault identification using a combined index. Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research, 2001, 40(20): 4403-4414 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie000141+. Google Scholar

[32] Li G, Qin S J, Chai T, et al. Multi-directional reconstruction based contributions for root-cause diagnosis of dynamic processes. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference, 2014. 3500--3505. Google Scholar