国家重点研发计划(2018YFB1003900)
国家自然科学基金(61722202,61772107)
[1] Hoste K, Eeckhout L. Cole: compiler optimization level exploration. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, 2008. 165--174. Google Scholar
[2] Petersen K, Feldt R, Mujtaba S, et al. Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering, 2008. 68--77. Google Scholar
[3] Chen Y Y, Zhang Y. Compiler Principle. 3rd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2014. Google Scholar
[4] Garousi V, Mesbah A, Betin-Can A. A systematic mapping study of web application testing. Inf Software Tech, 2013, 55: 1374-1396 CrossRef Google Scholar
[5] Neto C R L, Neto P A M S, Almeida E S D, et al. A Mapping Study on Software Product Lines Testing Tools. In: Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 2012. 628--634. Google Scholar
[6] Ouhbi S, Idri A, Fernández-Alemán J L, et al. Software quality requirements: a systematic mapping study. In: Proceedings of the 20th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, 2013. 231--238. Google Scholar
[7] Cosentino V, Canovas Izquierdo J L, Cabot J. A Systematic Mapping Study of Software Development With GitHub. IEEE Access, 2017, 5: 7173-7192 CrossRef Google Scholar
[8] de Lima E D, Silva A F D, Herrera C. A case-based reasoning approach to find good compiler optimization sequences. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC), Temuco, 2013. 8--10. Google Scholar
[9] Yi Q, Wang Q, Cui H M. Specializing compiler optimizations through programmable composition for dense matrix computations. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2014. 596--608. Google Scholar
[10] Cooper K D, Grosul A, Harvey T J. Exploring the structure of the space of compilation sequences using randomized search algorithms. J Supercomput, 2006, 36: 135-151 CrossRef Google Scholar
[11] Kulkarni P, Zhao W, Moon H, et al. Finding effective optimization phase sequences. In: Proceedings of ACM Sigplan Conference on Language, Compiler, and Tool for Embedded Systems, 2003. 12--23. Google Scholar
[12] Jantz M R, Kulkarni P A. Performance potential of optimization phase selection during dynamic JIT compilation. SIGPLAN Not, 2013, 48: 131 CrossRef Google Scholar
[13] Ansel J, Kamil S, Veeramachaneni K, et al. Opentuner: an extensible framework for program autotuning. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation, 2014. 303--316. Google Scholar
[14] Boussaa M, Barais O, Baudry B, et al. NOTICE: a framework for non-functional testing of compilers. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security, 2016. 335--346. Google Scholar
[15] Lokuciejewski P, Plazar S, Falk H, et al. Multi-objective exploration of compiler optimizations for real-time systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Object/component/service-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, 2010. 115--122. Google Scholar
[16] Lokuciejewski P, Plazar S, Falk H. Approximating Pareto optimal compiler optimization sequences-a trade-off between WCET, ACET and code size. Softw-Pract Exper, 2011, 41: 1437-1458 CrossRef Google Scholar
[17] Chebolu N A B S, Wankar R. Multi-objective exploration for compiler optimizations and parameters. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Multi-disciplinary Trends in Artificial Intelligence, 2014. 23--34. Google Scholar
[18] Cavazos J, Fursin G, Agakov F, et al. Rapidly selecting good compiler optimizations using performance counters. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, 2007. 185--197. Google Scholar
[19] Fursin G, Kashnikov Y, Memon A W. Milepost GCC: Machine Learning Enabled Self-tuning Compiler. Int J Parallel Prog, 2011, 39: 296-327 CrossRef Google Scholar
[20] Nobre R, Martins L G A. Use of previously acquired positioning of optimizations for phase ordering exploration. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Software and Compilers for Embedded Systems, 2015. 58--67. Google Scholar
[21] Purini S, Jain L. Finding good optimization sequences covering program space. ACM Trans Archit Code Optim, 2013, 9: 1-23 CrossRef Google Scholar
[22] Park E, Cavazos J, Alvarez M A. Using graph-based program characterization for predictive modeling. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, 2012. 196--206. Google Scholar
[23] Ashouri A H, Bignoli A, Palermo G. MiCOMP. ACM Trans Archit Code Optim, 2017, 14: 1-28 CrossRef Google Scholar
[24] Park E, Kartsaklis C, Cavazos J. HERCULES: strong patterns towards more intelligent predictive modeling. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Parallel Processing, 2014. 172--181. Google Scholar
[25] Martins L G A, Nobre R, Cardoso J M P. Clustering-Based Selection for the Exploration of Compiler Optimization Sequences. ACM Trans Archit Code Optim, 2016, 13: 1-28 CrossRef Google Scholar
[26] Ashouri A H, Mariani G, Palermo G. COBAYN. ACM Trans Archit Code Optim, 2016, 13: 1-25 CrossRef Google Scholar
[27] Foleiss J H, Faustino d S A, Ruiz L B. The Effect of Combining Compiler Optimizations on Code Size. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society, 2011. 187--194. Google Scholar
[28] Plotnikov D, Melnik D, Vardanyan M, et al. An Automatic tool for tuning compiler optimizations. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technologies Revised Selected Papers, Yerevan, 2014. 1--7. Google Scholar
[29] Lima E D D, Xavier T C D S, Silva A F D, et al. Compiling for performance and power efficiency. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Power and Timing Modeling, Optimization and Simulation, 2013. 142--149. Google Scholar
[30] Narayanamurthy N, Pattabiraman K, Ripeanu M. Finding resilience-friendly compiler optimizations using meta-heuristic search techniques. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC), 2016. 1--12. Google Scholar
[31] Sangchoolie B, Ayatolahi F, Johansson R, et al. A study of the impact of Bit-Flip errors on programs compiled with different optimization levels. In: Proceedings of Dependable Computing Conference, 2014. 146--157. Google Scholar
[32] Li F Q, Tang F L, Shen Y. Feature Mining for Machine Learning Based Compilation Optimization. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, 2014. 207--214. Google Scholar
[33] Nazarian G, Strydis C, Gaydadjiev G. Compatibility study of compile-time optimizations for power and reliability. In: Proceedings of 2011 14th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design, 2011. 809--813. Google Scholar
[34] Touati S A A, Barthou D. On the decidability of phase ordering problem in optimizing compilation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Computing Frontiers, 2006. 147--156. Google Scholar
[35] Jantz M R, Kulkarni P A. Analyzing and addressing false interactions during compiler optimization phase ordering. Softw Pract Exper, 2014, 44: 643-679 CrossRef Google Scholar
[36] Chebolu N A B S, Wankar R. A novel scheme for Compiler Optimization Framework. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, 2015. 2374--2380. Google Scholar
[37] Nobre R, Martins L G A, Cardoso J M P. A graph-based iterative compiler pass selection and phase ordering approach. SIGPLAN Not, 2016, 51: 21-30 CrossRef Google Scholar
[38] Ashouri A H, Bignoli A, Palermo G, et al. Predictive modeling methodology for compiler phase-ordering. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Parallel Programming and Run-Time Management Techniques for Many-core Architectures and the 5th Workshop on Design Tools and Architectures For Multicore Embedded Computing Platforms, 2016. 7--12. Google Scholar
[39] Chen Y, Fang S, Huang Y. Deconstructing iterative optimization. ACM Trans Archit Code Optim, 2012, 9: 1-30 CrossRef Google Scholar
[40] Lu P J, Che Y G, Wang Z H. An Effective Iterative Compilation Search Algorithm for High Performance Computing Applications. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on High PERFORMANCE Computing and Communications, 2008. 368--373. Google Scholar
[41] Xuan J, Jiang H, Ren Z. Solving the Large Scale Next Release Problem with a Backbone-Based Multilevel Algorithm. IIEEE Trans Software Eng, 2012, 38: 1195-1212 CrossRef Google Scholar
[42] Ren Z, Jiang H, Xuan J. Hyper-heuristics with low level parameter adaptation.. Evolary Computation, 2012, 20: 189-227 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
[43] Chen X, Jiang H, Chen Z. Automatic test report augmentation to assist crowdsourced testing. Front Comput Sci, 2019, 13: 943-959 CrossRef Google Scholar
[44] Li X C, Jiang H, Kamei Y, et al. Bridging semantic gaps between natural languages and APIs with word embedding. IEEE Trans Softw Eng, 2018. doi: 10.1109/TSE.2018.2876006. Google Scholar
[45] Li X C, Jiang H, Liu D, et al. Unsupervised Deep Bug Report Summarization. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Program Comprehension, 2018. 144--155. Google Scholar
[46] Mou L L, Li G, Zhang L, et al. Convolutional Neural Networks over Tree Structures for Programming Language Processing. In: Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016. 1287--1293. Google Scholar
Figure 1
The structure of compiler
Figure 2
Procedure of publication analysis
Figure 3
(Color online) The number of publications per year
Figure 4
(Color online) Venues of publications
Figure 5
(Color online) Heuristic search algorithms and objectives
Figure 6
(Color online) Machine learning algorithms and objectives
Figure 7
(Color online) Statistical results of research types
Figure 8
(Color online) Statistical results of target compilers
Figure 9
(Color online) Statistical results of target benchmarks
| Abbreviation | Full name of journals/conferences |
| LCTES | ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems |
| TACO | |
| CGO | IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization |
| SCCC | International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society |
| EDCC | European Dependable Computing Conference |
| CASES | International Conference on Compilers, Architecture, and Synthesis for Embedded Systems |
| TJSC | |
| IJPP |
| Heuristic algorithms | Machine learning | |
| Input | Encode | Feature representation |
| Output | Compiler optimization sequence | Compiler optimization sequence |
| Training set | Unnecessary | Necessary |
| Time consuming | Long | Short |
| ID | Author | Frequency |
| 1 | John Cavazos | 9 |
| 2 | Prasad A. Kulkarni | 7 |
| 3 | David Whalley | 6 |
| 4 | Amir Hossein Ashouri | 5 |
| 5 | Cristina Silvano | 5 |
| 6 | Eunjung Park | 5 |
| 7 | Gianluca Palermo | 5 |
| 8 | Jack Davidson | 5 |
| 9 | Joao M. P. Cardoso | 5 |
| 10 | Keith D. Cooper | 5 |
| 11 | Ricardo Nobre | 5 |
Download PDF
