SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 49 , Issue 1 : 112-118(2019) https://doi.org/10.1360/N112018-00168

From wolf pack intelligence to UAV swarm cooperative decision-making

More info
  • ReceivedJun 23, 2018
  • AcceptedSep 6, 2018
  • PublishedJan 3, 2019


Funded by





[1] Duan H B, Qiu H X. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Swarm Autonomous Control Based on Swarm Intelligence. Beijing: Science Press, 2018. Google Scholar

[2] Duan H B, Li P. Autonomous control for unmanned aerial vehicle swarms based on biological collective behaviors. Sci Technol Rev, 2017, 35: 17--25. Google Scholar

[3] Luo D L, Xu Y, Zhang J P. New progresses on UAV swarm confrontation. Sci Technol Rev, 2017, 35: 26--31. Google Scholar

[4] Kim D G, Park G H, Kim H N. Computationally Efficient TDOA/FDOA Estimation for Unknown Communication Signals in Electronic Warfare Systems. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2018, 54: 77-89 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[5] Qiu H X, Duan H B. From collective flight in bird flocks to unmanned aerial vehicle autonomous swarm formation. Chinese J Eng, 2017, 39: 317--322. Google Scholar

[6] Couzin I. Collective minds. Nature, 2007, 445: 715-715 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[7] Udell M A R, Dorey N R, Wynne C D L. Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Animal Behaviour, 2008, 76: 1767-1773 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R. Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2008, 105: 1232-1237 CrossRef PubMed ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[9] Nagy M, ákos Z, Biro D. Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks. Nature, 2010, 464: 890-893 CrossRef PubMed ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[10] Vicsek T, Zafeiris A. Collective motion. Phys Rep, 2012, 517: 71-140 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[11] Bentosela M, Wynne C D L, D'Orazio M. Sociability and gazing toward humans in dogs and wolves: Simple behaviors with broad implications.. Jrnl Exper Anal Behav, 2016, 105: 68-75 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[12] Hiestand L. A comparison of problem-solving and spatial orientation in the wolf (Canis lupus) and dog (Canis familiaris).. Behav Genet, 2011, 41: 840-857 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[13] Lampe M, Br?uer J, Kaminski J. The effects of domestication and ontogeny on cognition in dogs and wolves. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 11690 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[14] Udell M A R, Dorey N R, Wynne C D L. The performance of stray dogs (Canis familiaris) living in a shelter on human-guided object-choice tasks. Animal Behaviour, 2010, 79: 717-725 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] MacNulty D R, Smith D W, Mech L D. Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk. Behaval Ecol, 2012, 23: 75-82 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Bonanni R, Cafazzo S, Abis A. Age-graded dominance hierarchies and social tolerance in packs of free-ranging dogs. Behaval Ecol, 2017, 28: 1004-1020 CrossRef Google Scholar

[17] MacNulty D R, Mech L D, Smith D W. A Proposed Ethogram of Large-Carnivore Predatory Behavior, Exemplified by the Wolf. J Mammalogy, 2007, 88: 595-605 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Baan C, Bergmüller R, Smith D W. Conflict management in free-ranging wolves, Canis lupus. Animal Behaviour, 2014, 90: 327-334 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Palagi E, Cordoni G. Postconflict third-party affiliation in Canis lupus: do wolves share similarities with the great apes?. Animal Behaviour, 2009, 78: 979-986 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Faster and farther: wolf movement on linear features and implications for hunting behaviour. J Appl Ecol, 2017, 54: 253-263 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Schl?gel U E, Merrill E H, Lewis M A. Territory surveillance and prey management: Wolves keep track of space and time.. Ecol Evol, 2017, 7: 8388-8405 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[22] Cassidy K A, MacNulty D R, Stahler D R, et al. Group composition effects on aggressive interpack interactions of gray wolves in Yellowstone National Park. Behav Ecol, 2015, 26: 637--642. Google Scholar

[23] Qiu H X, Duan H B, Fan Y M. Multiple unmanned aerial vehicle autonomous formation based on the behavior mechanism in pigeon flocks. Control Theory Appl, 2015, 32: 1298--1304. Google Scholar

[24] Niu Y F, Xiao X J, Ke G Y. Operation concept and key techniques of unmanned aerial vehicle swarms. Defense Technol Rev, 2013, 34: 37--43. Google Scholar

[25] Weitzenfeld A. A Prey Catching and Predator Avoidance Neural-Schema Architecture for Single and Multiple Robots. J Intell Robot Syst, 2008, 51: 203-233 CrossRef Google Scholar

[26] Madden J D, Arkin R C, Macnulty D R. Multi-robot system based on model of wolf hunting behavior to emulate wolf and elk interactions. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Tianjin, 2010. 1043--1050. Google Scholar

[27] Chen H H, Duan H B. Multiple unmanned aerial vehicle autonomous formation via wolf packs mechanism. In: Proceedings of IEEE/CSAA International Conference on Aircraft Utility Systems, Beijing, 2016. 606--610. Google Scholar

[28] Escobedo R, Muro C, Spector L. Group size, individual role differentiation and effectiveness of cooperation in a homogeneous group of hunters.. J R Soc Interface, 2014, 11: 20140204-20140204 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    (Color online) Mapping mechanism from the wolf pack intelligence to the decision-making of UAV swarm confrontation

  • Table 1   Comparison of the characteristics of wolves, birds, fish school and ant colony
    Property Wolf pack Bird flock Fish school Ant colony
    Cognition Strong General General Weak
    Adaptivity Strong General Weak Weak
    Sociality Rigorous Hierarchies Unknown Rigorous
    Motion characters Selective topology Fixed topology Fixed domain Pheromone