SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 48 , Issue 7 : 810-823(2018) https://doi.org/10.1360/N112018-00002

The optimization and upgrading of the collaborative relationship in “Internet +" manufacturing industry

More info
  • ReceivedJan 2, 2018
  • AcceptedMar 18, 2018
  • PublishedJul 20, 2018


Funded by



[1] Ian W. A third industrial revolution. The Economist, 2012--4--21. Google Scholar

[2] Byrne D M, Oliner S D, Sichel D E. Is the information technology revolution over? Aei Economics Working Papers, 2013, 25: 59--72. Google Scholar

[3] Johnson M W, Christensen C M, Kagermann H. Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Rev, 2008, 35: 52--60. Google Scholar

[4] 李伯虎, 柴旭东, 张霖, 等. 云制造------一种智能制造的模式与手段, 智能制造. 电子工业出版社, 2016. Google Scholar

[5] NAN文献为空. Google Scholar

[6] Wang J C. Differentiating industrial proximity and agglomeration in the development of clusters and parks. China Soft Sci, 2005, 12: 91--98. Google Scholar

[7] Cai Y Z, Zhang J N. The substitution and percasiveness effects of ICT on China's economic growth. Economic Res J, 2015, 12: 100--114. Google Scholar

[8] Liu Z. Study on the `Internet +' and the Internet-based upgrading of industry clusters. Sci Sci Manage S & T, 2015, 36: 73--82. Google Scholar

[9] Wang M F, Li J. Internet, industry clusters and global production networks: the new ICTs' effects on industrial space organization. Human Geography, 2009, 2: 17--22. Google Scholar

[10] Jiang X J. Resource reorganization and the growth of the service industry in an interconnected society. Econ Res, 2017, 3: 4--17. Google Scholar

[11] Chen J F, Guo C H, Wei W. “Internet plus traditional Chinese medicine": reconstructing development pattern of the traditional chinese medicine's whole industry chain. China Soft Science, 2016, 6: 26--38. Google Scholar

[12] 左小明. 基于多层次列表的多核制造集群网络资源计划体系. 博士学位论文. 广州: 暨南大学, 2009. Google Scholar

[13] Zuo X M. The operation mode and agent analysis of collaboeative relationship in manufacturing cluster network. J Graduate School Chin Acad Soc Sci, 2013, 4: 51--56. Google Scholar

[14] Zuo X M. The life cycle and growth mechanism of collaborative process in manufacturing cluster network. J Graduate School Chin Acad Soc Sci, 2011, 3: 56--60. Google Scholar

[15] 耿先锋, 何志哲. 基于社会网络的联盟协作关系治理. 现代管理科学, 2007, 8: 37--38. Google Scholar

[16] Chen H H, Wang N. Enterprises' cooperative games analysis under the mode of open innovation---from the perspective of Internet. Sci Tech Manage Res, 2013, 33: 218--222. Google Scholar

[17] Wang J, Zhou Q, Zhao C. Industrial chain integration, structure hole and firm growth: BYD and tencent Inc as example. Sci Sci Manage S & T, 2013, 34: 103--115. Google Scholar

[18] Xing L Z. Analysis of regional industrial structure model based on complex networks theory. J Ind Tech Econ, 2012, 31: 19--29. Google Scholar

[19] Cao J Q, Qi G Q, Gao X. The impact of collaboration network's small-world characteristics on firm innovation performance: an empirical research on industry-university-research collaboration network in Chinese ICT industry. Chin J Manage Sci, 2015, 23: 657--661. Google Scholar

[20] Guo Y Y, Chi R Y, Duan S. S&T intermediary function' network position and performance of industry cluster: evidence from typical industry clusters in Zhejiang Province. Studies Sci Sci, 2014, 32: 841--851. Google Scholar

[21] Du H D, Zhao S M. Empirical research on industrial structure evolution of G7 and BRIC: network analysis of input-output data from 1995 to 2005. J Indust Eng Eng Manage, 2014, 28: 17--25. Google Scholar

[22] Xian Y B, Mei L. Diffusion of network product with indirect network effect---research based upon complex network and computational economics. J Manage Sci China, 2009, 12: 70--81. Google Scholar

[23] Yuan B, Liu H L, Lin Y. The effect of word of mouth about entrepreneurs on consumers' evaluation of entrepreneur's image. China Soft Sci, 2017, 1: 103--114. Google Scholar

[24] 青平, 张莹, 涂铭,等. 网络意见领袖动员方式对网络集群行为参与的影响研究------基于产品伤害危机背景下的实验研究. 管理世界, 2016, 7: 109--120. Google Scholar

[25] 孙军, 高彦彦. 网络效应下的平台竞争及其后果分析. 管理世界, 2016, 5: 182--183. Google Scholar

[26] Li L, Zhao X D, Jian Z Q. Operation srategy of platform enterprisesin network environments. J Manage Sci China, 2016, 19: 15--33. Google Scholar

[27] 段文奇, 赵良杰. 基于复杂网络的平台扩散机制和竞争策略研究. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2012. Google Scholar

[28] Witt U. What is specific about evolutionary economics? J Evol Econ, 2008, 18: 547--575. Google Scholar

[29] Scott J. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: SAGE Publications, 2000. Google Scholar

[30] Berkowitz S D. An Introduction to Structural Analysis: the Network Approach to Social Research. Toronto: Butterworths, 2013. Google Scholar

[31] Tsvetovat M, Kouznetsov A. Social Network Analysis for Startups. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2013. Google Scholar

[32] NAN文献为空. Google Scholar

[33] NAN文献为空. Google Scholar

[34] Tai D Y, Xu F Y, Hu W. Cooperation concept and implementation of cloud manufacturing. Comput Integr Manuf Syst, 2012, 18: 1575--1583. Google Scholar

[35] Liu Y K, Zhang L, Tao F, et al. Development and implementation of cloud manufacturing: an evolutionary perspective. In: Proceedings of ASME 2013 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference Collocated with the 41st North American Manufacturing Research Conference, Madison, 2013. V002T02A007. Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    The control model of optimization and upgrading for the collaborative relationship in “Internet +" manufacturing industry

  • Figure 2

    (Color online) Network topology diagram. (a) Network 1; (b) network 2; (c) network 3

  • Figure 3

    (Color online) Distribution of the shortest path could be reached

  • Figure 4

    (Color online) Power distribution of the closeness centrality of the network. (a) Normalized closeness centrality (in); (b) normalized closeness centrality (out)

  • Figure 5

    (Color online) Bonacich power. (a) Bonacich power (in) with $\beta<$ 0; (b) Bonacich power (out) with $\beta<$ 0

  • Figure 6

    (Color online) Statistics information of transaction by geographic location. Transaction number (a) and transaction growth (b) with respect to geographic location

  • Table 1   The characteristics of paradigm, means and ecosystem of each stage in the evolutionary path
    (1) Local inter-connected business network (2) Comprehensive interconnected commercial network (3) Open self-organizing innovation network
    Paradigm: Networked manufacturing (collaboration from off-line to on-line) Service-oriented manufacturing (horizontal optimization of the value chain) Mass customization (user-centered collaborative innovation)
    Means: Enhance the efficiency of all kinds of collaboration and enhance the connection capability of nodes Provide full connectivity and promote equal opportunities between nodes Enhancing openness and resource sharing on demand and promote the cross “reaction"
    Ecosystem: Local inter-connected, collaborative relationship is fixing and stable Comprehensive interconnected, vertical cooperation and horizontal competition in value chain, flexible Factor composition on demand, innovation ability upgrade, more flexible
  • Table 2   Average length of shortest network path
    Network Average length of shortest network path
    Network 1 6.4
    Network 2 4.7
    Network 3 4.1
  • Table 3   Average intensity of the network node
    Network Average intensity of the network node
    Network 1 2.8667
    Network 2 11.1579
    Network 3 15.6990
  • Table 4   Index of small-world features of network
    Network Weighted clustering coefficient Small-world entropy
    Network 1 0.019 1.870
    Network 2 0.995 1714.787
    Network 3 0.656 504
  • Table 5   Network density
    Network Network density
    Network 1 0.00009874
    Network 2 0.00102201
    Network 3 0.00196813
  • Table 6   Central potential of the closeness centrality and the eigenvector
    Network Central potential of Central potential of Central potential of Central potential
    the closeness the closeness the closeness of the eigenvector
    centrality (in)centrality (out)centrality (total)
    Network 1 0.2633 0.02267 17.2707 108.198
    Network 2 0.4354 0.03841 266.1177 91.865
    Network 3 0.7805 0.04055 652.0498 91.452