References
[1]
Wang Z C. Development and formation of simulation science. J Syst Simul, 2005, 06: 1279--1281.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Wang Z C. Development and formation of simulation science. J Syst Simul, 2005, 06: 1279--1281&
[2]
Yang M, Zhang B, Wang Z C. The analysis of modeling and simulation development direction. J Syst Simul, 2004, 16: 1901--1904.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Yang M, Zhang B, Wang Z C. The analysis of modeling and simulation development direction. J Syst Simul, 2004, 16: 1901--1904&
[3]
Robinson S. Simulation: the Practice of Model Development and Use. London: Palgrave Macmillan Press, 2014. 18--21.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Robinson S. Simulation: the Practice of Model Development and Use. London: Palgrave Macmillan Press, 2014. 18--21&
[4]
Wang Z C, Zhang B, Yang M. Verification, validation and accreditation (VV&A) for simulation system: current status and future. J Syst Simul, 1999, 11: 321--326.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Wang Z C, Zhang B, Yang M. Verification, validation and accreditation (VV&A) for simulation system: current status and future. J Syst Simul, 1999, 11: 321--326&
[5]
Qian X C. Research on simulation model validation and calibration methods under uncertainty. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Qian X C. Research on simulation model validation and calibration methods under uncertainty. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016&
[6]
Yang M, Zhang B, Ma P, et al. Five key issues of the development of simulation systems VV&A. J Syst Simul, 2003, 15: 1502--1506.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Yang M, Zhang B, Ma P, et al. Five key issues of the development of simulation systems VV&A. J Syst Simul, 2003, 15: 1502--1506&
[7]
Sargent
R G.
Verification and validation of simulation models.
J Simul,
2013, 7: 12-24
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Verification and validation of simulation models&author=Sargent R G&publication_year=2013&journal=J Simul&volume=7&pages=12-24
[8]
Distributed Interactive Simulation Committee of the IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Recommended Practice for Distributed Interactive Simulation — Verification, Validation, and Accreditation. Version 1278.4, 1997.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Distributed Interactive Simulation Committee of the IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Recommended Practice for Distributed Interactive Simulation — Verification, Validation, and Accreditation. Version 1278.4, 1997&
[9]
Conway
R W,
Johnson
B M,
Maxwell
W L.
Some problems of digital systems simulation.
Manage Sci,
1959, 6: 92-110
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Some problems of digital systems simulation&author=Conway R W&author=Johnson B M&author=Maxwell W L&publication_year=1959&journal=Manage Sci&volume=6&pages=92-110
[10]
Fishman G S, Kiviat P J. The analysis of simulation generated time series. Manage Sci, 1967, 3: 525--557.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Fishman G S, Kiviat P J. The analysis of simulation generated time series. Manage Sci, 1967, 3: 525--557&
[11]
Hermann
C F.
Validation problems in games and simulations with special reference to models of international politics.
Syst Res,
1967, 12: 216-231
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Validation problems in games and simulations with special reference to models of international politics&author=Hermann C F&publication_year=1967&journal=Syst Res&volume=12&pages=216-231
[12]
Schruben
L W.
Establishing the credibility of simulations.
Simulation,
1980, 34: 101-105
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Establishing the credibility of simulations&author=Schruben L W&publication_year=1980&journal=Simulation&volume=34&pages=101-105
[13]
Teorey T J. Validation criteria for computer system simulations. Simuletter, 1975, 6: 9--20.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Teorey T J. Validation criteria for computer system simulations. Simuletter, 1975, 6: 9--20&
[14]
Balci O, Sargent R G. Some examples of simulation model validation using hypothesis testing. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Winter Simulation, San Diego, 1982. 621--629.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Balci O, Sargent R G. Some examples of simulation model validation using hypothesis testing. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Winter Simulation, San Diego, 1982. 621--629&
[15]
Balci O, Sargent R G. Validation of simulation models via simultaneous confidence intervals. Am J Math Manage Sci, 1984, 4: 375--406.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Balci O, Sargent R G. Validation of simulation models via simultaneous confidence intervals. Am J Math Manage Sci, 1984, 4: 375--406&
[16]
Kheir
N A,
Holmes
W M.
On validating simulation models of missile systems.
Simulation,
1978, 30: 117-128
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=On validating simulation models of missile systems&author=Kheir N A&author=Holmes W M&publication_year=1978&journal=Simulation&volume=30&pages=117-128
[17]
Tytula T P. A Method for Validating Missile System Simulation Models. Army Missile R&D Command, Redstone Arsenal, 1978.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Tytula T P. A Method for Validating Missile System Simulation Models. Army Missile R&D Command, Redstone Arsenal, 1978&
[18]
Montgomery
D C,
Conard
R G.
Comparison of simulation and flight-test data for missile systems.
Simulation,
1980, 34: 63-72
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Comparison of simulation and flight-test data for missile systems&author=Montgomery D C&author=Conard R G&publication_year=1980&journal=Simulation&volume=34&pages=63-72
[19]
Balci
O.
Validation, verification, and testing techniques throughout the life cycle of a simulation study.
Ann Oper Res,
1994, 53: 121-173
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Validation, verification, and testing techniques throughout the life cycle of a simulation study&author=Balci O&publication_year=1994&journal=Ann Oper Res&volume=53&pages=121-173
[20]
Kleijnen
J P C.
Verification and validation of simulation models.
Eur J Oper Res,
1995, 82: 145-162
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Verification and validation of simulation models&author=Kleijnen J P C&publication_year=1995&journal=Eur J Oper Res&volume=82&pages=145-162
[21]
Defense Modeling and Simulation Office. Verification, Validation and Accreditation Recommended Practice Guide BUILD 1. 1996.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Defense Modeling and Simulation Office. Verification, Validation and Accreditation Recommended Practice Guide BUILD 1. 1996&
[22]
Defense Modeling and Simulation Office. Verification, Validation and Accreditation Recommended Practice Guide BUILD 2. 2000.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Defense Modeling and Simulation Office. Verification, Validation and Accreditation Recommended Practice Guide BUILD 2. 2000&
[23]
Simulation Interoperability Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Recommended Practice for Verification, Validation, and Accreditation of A Federation: an Overlay to the High Level Architecture Federation Development and Execution Process. Version 1516.4, 2007.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Simulation Interoperability Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Recommended Practice for Verification, Validation, and Accreditation of A Federation: an Overlay to the High Level Architecture Federation Development and Execution Process. Version 1516.4, 2007&
[24]
Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization. Reference for Generic Methodology for Verification and Validation (GM-VV) to Support Acceptance of Models, Simulations and Data. Vol. 1: Introduction and Overview Version 1, 2012.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization. Reference for Generic Methodology for Verification and Validation (GM-VV) to Support Acceptance of Models, Simulations and Data. Vol. 1: Introduction and Overview Version 1, 2012&
[25]
Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization. Reference for Generic Methodology for Verification and Validation (GM-VV) to Support Acceptance of Models, Simulations and Data. Vol. 2: Implementation Guide Version 2, 2013.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization. Reference for Generic Methodology for Verification and Validation (GM-VV) to Support Acceptance of Models, Simulations and Data. Vol. 2: Implementation Guide Version 2, 2013&
[26]
Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization. Reference for Generic Methodology for Verification and Validation (GM-VV) to Support Acceptance of Models, Simulations and Data. Vol. 3: Reference Manual Version 3, 2013.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization. Reference for Generic Methodology for Verification and Validation (GM-VV) to Support Acceptance of Models, Simulations and Data. Vol. 3: Reference Manual Version 3, 2013&
[27]
Mullins
J,
Ling
Y,
Mahadevan
S.
Separation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic model validation.
Reliab Eng Syst Safe,
2016, 147: 49-59
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Separation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic model validation&author=Mullins J&author=Ling Y&author=Mahadevan S&publication_year=2016&journal=Reliab Eng Syst Safe&volume=147&pages=49-59
[28]
Zhao
L F,
Lu
Z Z,
Yun
W Y.
Validation metric based on Mahalanobis distance for models with multiple correlated responses.
Reliab Eng Syst Safe,
2017, 159: 80-89
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Validation metric based on Mahalanobis distance for models with multiple correlated responses&author=Zhao L F&author=Lu Z Z&author=Yun W Y&publication_year=2017&journal=Reliab Eng Syst Safe&volume=159&pages=80-89
[29]
Kwag
S,
Gupta
A,
Dinh
N.
Probabilistic risk assessment based model validation method using Bayesian network.
Reliab Eng Syst Safe,
2018, 169: 380-393
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Probabilistic risk assessment based model validation method using Bayesian network&author=Kwag S&author=Gupta A&author=Dinh N&publication_year=2018&journal=Reliab Eng Syst Safe&volume=169&pages=380-393
[30]
Ao
D,
Hu
Z,
Mahadevan
S.
Design of validation experiments for life prediction models.
Reliab Eng Syst Safe,
2017, 165: 22-33
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Design of validation experiments for life prediction models&author=Ao D&author=Hu Z&author=Mahadevan S&publication_year=2017&journal=Reliab Eng Syst Safe&volume=165&pages=22-33
[31]
Wu
D Q,
Lu
Z Z,
Wang
Y P.
Model validation and calibration based on component functions of model output.
Reliab Eng Syst Safe,
2015, 140: 59-70
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Model validation and calibration based on component functions of model output&author=Wu D Q&author=Lu Z Z&author=Wang Y P&publication_year=2015&journal=Reliab Eng Syst Safe&volume=140&pages=59-70
[32]
Li
Y L,
Wang
X J,
Wang
C.
Non-probabilistic Bayesian update method for model validation.
Appl Math Model,
2018, 58: 388-403
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Non-probabilistic Bayesian update method for model validation&author=Li Y L&author=Wang X J&author=Wang C&publication_year=2018&journal=Appl Math Model&volume=58&pages=388-403
[33]
Jiang
X M,
Yuan
Y,
Mahadevan
S.
An investigation of Bayesian inference approach to model validation with non-normal data.
J Stat Comput Simul,
2013, 83: 1829-1851
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=An investigation of Bayesian inference approach to model validation with non-normal data&author=Jiang X M&author=Yuan Y&author=Mahadevan S&publication_year=2013&journal=J Stat Comput Simul&volume=83&pages=1829-1851
[34]
Ling
Y,
Mahadevan
S.
Quantitative model validation techniques: New insights.
Reliab Eng Syst Safe,
2013, 111: 217-231
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Quantitative model validation techniques: New insights&author=Ling Y&author=Mahadevan S&publication_year=2013&journal=Reliab Eng Syst Safe&volume=111&pages=217-231
[35]
Sankararaman
S,
Mahadevan
S.
Integration of model verification, validation, and calibration for uncertainty quantification in engineering systems.
Reliab Eng Syst Safe,
2015, 138: 194-209
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Integration of model verification, validation, and calibration for uncertainty quantification in engineering systems&author=Sankararaman S&author=Mahadevan S&publication_year=2015&journal=Reliab Eng Syst Safe&volume=138&pages=194-209
[36]
Atkinson
A D,
Hill
R R,
Pignatiello, Jr.
J J.
Wavelet ANOVA approach to model validation.
Simul Model Pract Theory,
2017, 78: 18-27
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Wavelet ANOVA approach to model validation&author=Atkinson A D&author=Hill R R&author=Pignatiello, Jr. J J&publication_year=2017&journal=Simul Model Pract Theory&volume=78&pages=18-27
[37]
Sarin H, Kokkolaras M, Hulbert G, et al. A comprehensive metric for comparing time histories in validation of simulation models with emphasis on vehicle safety applications. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, New York, 2009.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Sarin H, Kokkolaras M, Hulbert G, et al. A comprehensive metric for comparing time histories in validation of simulation models with emphasis on vehicle safety applications. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, New York, 2009&
[38]
Poropudas J, Virtanen K. Game theoretic validation of air combat simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Antonio, 2009. 3243--3250.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Poropudas J, Virtanen K. Game theoretic validation of air combat simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Antonio, 2009. 3243--3250&
[39]
Lemmers A, Roza M, Voogd J, et al. V&V study of an F-16 familiarization training simulator. In: Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop. USA: SISO, 2013. 98--108.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Lemmers A, Roza M, Voogd J, et al. V&V study of an F-16 familiarization training simulator. In: Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop. USA: SISO, 2013. 98--108&
[40]
Dhananjayan
A,
Seow
K T.
A formal transparency framework for validation of real-time discrete-event control requirements modeled by timed transition graphs.
IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst,
2015, 45: 350-361
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=A formal transparency framework for validation of real-time discrete-event control requirements modeled by timed transition graphs&author=Dhananjayan A&author=Seow K T&publication_year=2015&journal=IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst&volume=45&pages=350-361
[41]
Guerini
M,
Moneta
A.
A method for agent-based models validation.
J Economic Dyn Control,
2017, 82: 125-141
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=A method for agent-based models validation&author=Guerini M&author=Moneta A&publication_year=2017&journal=J Economic Dyn Control&volume=82&pages=125-141
[42]
Jebeile
J,
Barberousse
A.
Empirical agreement in model validation..
Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A,
2016, 56: 168-174
CrossRef
PubMed
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Empirical agreement in model validation.&author=Jebeile J&author=Barberousse A&publication_year=2016&journal=Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A&volume=56&pages=168-174
[43]
Michopoulos J, Lambrakos S. On the fundamental tautology of validating data-driven models and simulations. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science, Atlanta, 2005. 738--745.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Michopoulos J, Lambrakos S. On the fundamental tautology of validating data-driven models and simulations. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science, Atlanta, 2005. 738--745&
[44]
Szabo C, Teo Y M. On validation of semantic composability in data-driven simulation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Principles of Advanced and Distributed Simulation, Atlanta, 2010. 73--80.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Szabo C, Teo Y M. On validation of semantic composability in data-driven simulation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Principles of Advanced and Distributed Simulation, Atlanta, 2010. 73--80&
[45]
Lamperti
F.
An information theoretic criterion for empirical validation of simulation models.
Economet Stat,
2018, 5: 83-106
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=An information theoretic criterion for empirical validation of simulation models&author=Lamperti F&publication_year=2018&journal=Economet Stat&volume=5&pages=83-106
[46]
Guerini
M,
Moneta
A.
A method for agent-based models validation.
J Economic Dyn Control,
2017, 82: 125-141
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=A method for agent-based models validation&author=Guerini M&author=Moneta A&publication_year=2017&journal=J Economic Dyn Control&volume=82&pages=125-141
[47]
Wei H L, Li Z W. Grey relational analysis and its applieation to the validation of computer simulation models for missile systems. Syst Eng Electron, 1997, 2: 55--61.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Wei H L, Li Z W. Grey relational analysis and its applieation to the validation of computer simulation models for missile systems. Syst Eng Electron, 1997, 2: 55--61&
[48]
Li W, Jiao S, Lu L Y, et al. Validation and selection of simulation model based on the feature differences. Act Autom Sin, 2014, 40: 2134--2144.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Li W, Jiao S, Lu L Y, et al. Validation and selection of simulation model based on the feature differences. Act Autom Sin, 2014, 40: 2134--2144&
[49]
Li L, Lu Z Z. A new method for model validation with multivariate output. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2018, 168: 579--592.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Li L, Lu Z Z. A new method for model validation with multivariate output. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2018, 168: 579--592&
[50]
Wu Y J, Wang J M, Yang W G. Approach of credibility evaluation for testing system with small samples. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut, 2016, 42: 1911--1917.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Wu Y J, Wang J M, Yang W G. Approach of credibility evaluation for testing system with small samples. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut, 2016, 42: 1911--1917&
[51]
Zheng K, Hu J, Zhan Z F, et al. Multivariate responses analysis for model validation of dynamic systems. J Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, 2015, 49: 191--195.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Zheng K, Hu J, Zhan Z F, et al. Multivariate responses analysis for model validation of dynamic systems. J Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, 2015, 49: 191--195&
[52]
Wang H Y. Research on multivariate simulation result validation methods under uncertainty. Dissertation for Master Degree. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Wang H Y. Research on multivariate simulation result validation methods under uncertainty. Dissertation for Master Degree. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016&
[53]
Min
F Y,
Yang
M,
Wang
Z C.
Knowledge-based method for the validation of complex simulation models.
Simul Model Pract Theory,
2010, 18: 500-515
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Knowledge-based method for the validation of complex simulation models&author=Min F Y&author=Yang M&author=Wang Z C&publication_year=2010&journal=Simul Model Pract Theory&volume=18&pages=500-515
[54]
Jiao S, Li W, Yang M. Validation method of simulation model based on triangular fuzzy number. J Cent South Univ (Sci Technol), 2014, 45: 124--131.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Jiao S, Li W, Yang M. Validation method of simulation model based on triangular fuzzy number. J Cent South Univ (Sci Technol), 2014, 45: 124--131&
[55]
Huang Z J, Chen B, Ou Y H. Model checking continuous time Markov process based on timed schedulers. J Guangxi Univ Sci Technol, 2014, 25: 59--63.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Huang Z J, Chen B, Ou Y H. Model checking continuous time Markov process based on timed schedulers. J Guangxi Univ Sci Technol, 2014, 25: 59--63&
[56]
Wang S, Wu D H, Qu L, et al. Study on credibility evaluation framework of complex simulation systems. Comput Simul, 2012, 29: 116--122.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Wang S, Wu D H, Qu L, et al. Study on credibility evaluation framework of complex simulation systems. Comput Simul, 2012, 29: 116--122&
[57]
Niu S, Lin S L, Li W, et al. Model validation method for discrete event simulation. J Syst Simul, 2017, 29: 1984--1990.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Niu S, Lin S L, Li W, et al. Model validation method for discrete event simulation. J Syst Simul, 2017, 29: 1984--1990&
[58]
Xia
W,
Yao
Y P,
Mu
X D.
Parallel model checking for discrete event simulation models based on event graphs.
J Softw,
2012, 23: 1429-1443
CrossRef
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Parallel model checking for discrete event simulation models based on event graphs&author=Xia W&author=Yao Y P&author=Mu X D&publication_year=2012&journal=J Softw&volume=23&pages=1429-1443
[59]
Fang K, Zhou Y C, Zhao E J. Discussion for the factor space of simulation model validation. Syst Eng Electron, 2017, 39: 2592--2602.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Fang K, Zhou Y C, Zhao E J. Discussion for the factor space of simulation model validation. Syst Eng Electron, 2017, 39: 2592--2602&
[60]
Zhao H Y. Analysis on credibility of radar seeker hardware-in-the-loop simulation system. Ship Electron Eng, 2015, 35: 90--92.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Zhao H Y. Analysis on credibility of radar seeker hardware-in-the-loop simulation system. Ship Electron Eng, 2015, 35: 90--92&
[61]
Lin S L, Li W, Ma P, et al. A new credibility assessment framework for training simulators. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation (ICCMS), Canberra, 2017. 182--186.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Lin S L, Li W, Ma P, et al. A new credibility assessment framework for training simulators. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation (ICCMS), Canberra, 2017. 182--186&
[62]
Zhang Z. Research on evaluation method for credibility of simulation system. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Zhang Z. Research on evaluation method for credibility of simulation system. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014&
[63]
Liu F, Ma P, Yang M, et al. Research on credibility quantification of complex simulation systems. J Harbin Inst Technol. 2007, 39: 1--3.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Liu F, Ma P, Yang M, et al. Research on credibility quantification of complex simulation systems. J Harbin Inst Technol. 2007, 39: 1--3&
[64]
Fang K, Zhou Y C, Zhao K B. Validation method for simulation models with iteration operation. Syst Eng Electron, 2017, 39: 445--450.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Fang K, Zhou Y C, Zhao K B. Validation method for simulation models with iteration operation. Syst Eng Electron, 2017, 39: 445--450&
[65]
Fang K, Yang M, Wang Z C. The HITVICE VV&A environment. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, 2005. 1220--1227.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Fang K, Yang M, Wang Z C. The HITVICE VV&A environment. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, 2005. 1220--1227&
[66]
Ju R S, Yang M, Huang K D, et al. Summary of service oriented modeling and simulation. Syst Eng Electron, 2013, 35: 1539--1546.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Ju R S, Yang M, Huang K D, et al. Summary of service oriented modeling and simulation. Syst Eng Electron, 2013, 35: 1539--1546&
[67]
Li B H, Chai X D, Hou B C, et al. Networked modeling & simulation platform based on concept of cloud computing — cloud simulation platform. J Syst Simul, 2009, 21: 5292--5299.
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Li B H, Chai X D, Hou B C, et al. Networked modeling & simulation platform based on concept of cloud computing — cloud simulation platform. J Syst Simul, 2009, 21: 5292--5299&