SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 48 , Issue 7 : 824-840(2018) https://doi.org/10.1360/N112017-00303

Backtracking analysis approach for effectiveness of air defense operation system of systems based on force-sparsed stacked-autoencoding neural networks

More info
  • ReceivedDec 31, 2017
  • AcceptedJan 28, 2018
  • PublishedJul 19, 2018


Funded by








[1] Hu X F. On War System Engineering: Methodology Towards to Information Age's War. Beijing: University of National Defense Press, 2013. 200--413. Google Scholar

[2] Hu X F, Rong M. Joint operation planning systems: issues and prospects. J Command Control, 2017, 3: 273--280. Google Scholar

[3] Yao X Y, Guo S M, Hu X F, et al. Construction for air defense system of systems based on MINE-FNA assembled algorithm. Command Control Simul, 2016, 1: 94--100. Google Scholar

[4] Tolk A. The next generation of modeling & simulation: integrating big data and deep learning. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Summer Computer Simulation, Chicago, 2015. Google Scholar

[5] Tannahill B K, Jamshidi M. System of Systems and big data analytics — bridging the gap. Comput Electr Eng, 2014, 40: 2-15 CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Hu X F, He X Y, Xu X L. Simulation in the big data era — review of new ideas and new theories in the 81st Academic Salon of China Association for Science and Technology. Sci Sin Inform, 2014, 44: 676--692. Google Scholar

[7] Zhang B, Hu X F, Wang Y, et al. Rudimental research of analysis of system of systems exceptional state. J Syst Simul, 2011, 23: 2494--2499. Google Scholar

[8] Wu W F, Hu X F. Capacity evaluation of networked operational system of systems based on big data. Mil Oper Res Syst Eng, 2016, 30: 26--32. Google Scholar

[9] Wu W F, Hu X F, Guo S M, et al. Analysis of combat SoS coordination based on multi-layered temporal networks. Complex Syst Complex Sci, 2017, 14: 1--10. Google Scholar

[10] Yao X Y, Guo S M, Hu X F, et al. Design evaluation indices for air defense systems based on RF-GLR integrated machine learning algorithms. J Command Control. 2015, 1: 269--277. Google Scholar

[11] Hu X F, Zhang Y, Li R J, et al. Capability evaluating problem of networking SOS. Syst Eng Theory Pract, 2015, 35: 1317--1323. Google Scholar

[12] Ding J F, Si G Y, Yang G Q. Visualization analysis of the capability of weapon system of systems for multi-dimensional indicators. J Syst Eng Electron, 2017, 28: 292-300 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Silver D, Huang A, Maddison C J. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 2016, 529: 484-489 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[14] Brown N, Sandholm T. Superhuman AI for heads-up no-limit poker: libratus beats top professionals. Science, 2018, 359: 418-424 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[15] Elaraby N M, Elmogy M, Barakat S. Deep learning: effective tool for big data analytics. Int J Comput Sci Eng (IJCSE), 2016, 5: 254--262. Google Scholar

[16] Hu X F, Guo S M, He X Y. Challenges to intelligent command information system: reason and revelation on deep green plan and AlphaGo. Command Inf Syst Technol, 2016, 7: 1--7. Google Scholar

[17] Guo S M, He X Y, Hu X F, et al. Challenges and trends in intelligent military information system. Control Theory Appl, 2016, 33: 1562--1571. Google Scholar

[18] Tao J Y, Wu L, Hu X F. Principle analysis on AlphaGo and perspective in military application of artificial intelligence. J Command Control, 2016, 2: 114--120. Google Scholar

[19] Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep Learning. Cambridge: MIT press, 2016. Google Scholar

[20] Lee M, Bressler S, Kozma R. Advances in cognitive engineering using neural networks. Neur Netw, 2017, 92: 1-2 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[21] Chen Q J, Song X, Yamada H, et al. Learning deep representation from big and heterogeneous data for traffic accident inference. In: Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligenc, Phoenix, 2016. 338--344. Google Scholar

[22] Angermueller C, P?rnamaa T, Parts L. Deep learning for computational biology. Mol Syst Biol, 2016, 12: 878 CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Zhang L, Liu Z, Zhang J Q, et al. Reduction method of weapon system of systems assessment index system based on autoencoder. J Cent South Univ (Sci Technol), 2013, 44: 4130--4137. Google Scholar

[24] Ou W, Liu S J, He X Y, et al. Tactical intention recognition algorithm based on encoded temporal features. Command Control Simul, 2016, 38: 36--41. Google Scholar

[25] Luong M T, Pham H, Manning C D. Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lisbon, 2015. 1412--1421. Google Scholar

[26] Sukhbaatar S, Weston J, Fergus R. End-to-end memory networks. In: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, 2015. 2440--2448. Google Scholar

[27] Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 2015, 518: 529-533 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[28] Reshef D N, Reshef Y A, Finucane H K. Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science, 2011, 334: 1518-1524 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[29] Girvan M, Newman M E J. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99: 7821-7826 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[30] Martinez A M, Kak A C. PCA versus LDA. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intel, 2001, 23: 228-233 CrossRef Google Scholar

[31] Meng L H, Ding S F, Zhang N, et al. Research of stacked denoising sparse autoencoder. In: Neural Computing and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2016. 1--18. Google Scholar

[32] Bengio Y. Deep Learning Tutorial. 2014. http://deeplearning.net. Google Scholar

[33] Zhou X, Guo J Q, Wang S L. Motion recognition by using a stacked autoencoder-based deep learning algorithm with smart phones. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications, Qufu, 2015. 778--787. Google Scholar

[34] Wu W F, Hu X F, Guo S M, et al. Methods of analyzing combat SoS coordination pattern based on temporal motif. In: Proceedings of Asian Simulation Conference, Beijing, 2016. 544--554. Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    (Color online) The idea of backtracking analysis approach based on FS-SAE

  • Figure 2

    (Color online) The design route for the structure of FS-SAE model. (a) Initial index sets; (b) initial index networks; (c) function indexes for SOS; (d) eigen indexes of community; (e) multilayered structure

  • Figure 3

    The flowchart of GN algorithm

  • Figure 4

    (Color online) Scenario setting and the construction of the networked index system of ADSOS. (a) Illustration of scenario setting; (b) initial index networks; (c) index network communities; (d) multilayer networked index system

  • Figure 5

    (Color online) Convergence comparison of different algorithms

  • Figure 6

    (Color online) The distribution of function index expectation of ADSOS. (a) The probability of function index expectation; (b) the range and the average value of function index expectation

  • Table 1   MICs between the initial indexes
    Index $X$1 $X$2 $X$3 $X$4 $X$5 $X$6
    $X$2 0.22279
    $X$3 0.24872 0.87671
    $X$4 0.23126 0.51958 0.71057
    $X$5 0.24557 0.51958 0.55146 0.43817
    $X$6 0.95095 0.40619 0.24412 0.50126 0.99107
  • Table 2   The accuracy of FS-SAE models for the mission
    Model Training set accuracy (%) Testing set accuracy (%)
    FS-SAE 95 82
    Sparsed-SAE 84 73