logo

SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 48 , Issue 7 : 743-766(2018) https://doi.org/10.1360/N112017-00272

Study on model reuse for complex system simulation

More info
  • ReceivedDec 10, 2017
  • AcceptedApr 8, 2018
  • PublishedJul 17, 2018

Abstract


Funded by

国家自然科学青年基金(61703015)

国家自然科学基金(61374199)


Acknowledgment

感谢北京航空航天大学宋晓, 哈尔滨工业大学杨明、马萍、李伟, 北京电子工程研究所施国强、林廷宇等, 参与了本文相关内容的讨论并提出了许多宝贵意见.


References

[1] Fan W H, Wu J H. Development and future trend of computer simulation and quantum computer simulation. J Syst Simul, 2017, 29: 1161--1167. Google Scholar

[2] Liu X T. Simulation Science and Technology and Engineering. Beijing: Science Press, 2013. Google Scholar

[3] Jamshidi M. Introduction to System of Systems. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2015. Google Scholar

[4] Hu X F. War complexity and issues in the SoS simulation research. Mil Oper Res Syst Eng, 2010, 24: 27--34. Google Scholar

[5] Jin W X, Xiao T Y. Simulation on evolutive behavior of system-of-systems (SoS) created for net-centric operations (NCO) based on complex system theory. J Syst Simul, 2010, 22: 2435--2445. Google Scholar

[6] Xu G B, Zeng L Z. Development tendency of digital simulation. Comput Simul, 2013, 30: 1--3. Google Scholar

[7] Fujimoto R, Bock C, Chen W, et al. Research Challenges in Modeling & Simulation for Engineering Complex Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2017. Google Scholar

[8] Lei Y L. Simulation model reuse theory and approaches with heterogeneous integration support. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2006. Google Scholar

[9] Overstreet C M, Nance R E, Balci O. Issues in enhancing model reuse. 2002. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6473/3f3741c39579e84cfbba41bd873e665db07e.pdf. Google Scholar

[10] Petty M D, Weisel E W. A formal basis for a theory of semantic composability. In: Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, 2003. Google Scholar

[11] Pidd M. Simulation software and model reuse: a polemic. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, San Diego, 2002. Google Scholar

[12] Liang Y Z, Zhang W S, Kang X Y, et al. A survey of model reuse methods. J Comput Simul, 2008, 25: 1--5. Google Scholar

[13] Ma Q F, Zhang W M, Xu H H. Research on technologies of simulation model reuse. In: Proceedings of Image Graphics Technology and Application Conference, Beijing, 2008. Google Scholar

[14] Balci O, Arthur J D, Ormsby W F. Achieving reusability and composability with a simulation conceptual model. J Simul, 2011, 5: 157-165 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Li W H, Li M, Zhao P, et al. Reusability assessment of simulation conceptual model. J Command Control Simul, 2012, 34: 92--96. Google Scholar

[16] Petty M D. Verification, Validation and Accreditation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Google Scholar

[17] Robinson S, Nance R E, Paul R J. Simulation model reuse: definitions, benefits and obstacles. Simul Model Pract Theory, 2004, 12: 479-494 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Keswani R, Joshi S, Jatain A. Software reuse in practice. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies, Rohtak, 2014. 159--162. Google Scholar

[19] ?ren T I, Zeigler B P. Concepts for advanced simulation methodologies. Simulation, 1979, 32: 69-82 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Huhn R, Mensh D R, Nance R, et al. Issues in simulation model integration, reusability and adaptability. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Winter Simulation, Washington, 1986. Google Scholar

[21] Zuo D L. Research on resource reuse technology in virtual simulation. Dissertation for Master Degree. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Technology, 2008. Google Scholar

[22] Morse K L. Data and metadata requirements for composable mission space environments. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, 2004. 271--278. Google Scholar

[23] Saulnier E T, Bortscheller B J. Simulation model reusability. IEEE Commun Mag, 1994, 32: 64-69 CrossRef Google Scholar

[24] Pos A, Borst P, Top J. Reusability of simulation models. Knowl-Based Syst, 1996, 9: 119-125 CrossRef Google Scholar

[25] Pace D K. Simulation conceptual model development issues and implications for reuse of simulation components. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Fall Simulation Conference, Orlando, 2000. Google Scholar

[26] Petty M D, Weisel E W, Mielke R R. Computational complexity of selecting components for composition. In: Proceedings of the Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, 2003. 14--19. Google Scholar

[27] Tolk A, Muguira J A. The levels of conceptual interoperability model. In: Proceedings of the Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, 2003. 127--130. Google Scholar

[28] Yilmaz L. On the need for contextualized introspective models to improve reuse and composability of defense simulations. J Defense Model Simul, 2004, 1: 141-151 CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Malak R J J, Paredis C J J. Foundations of validating reusable behavioral models in engineering design problems. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, 2004. 420--428. Google Scholar

[30] Hofmann M A. Modeling assumptions: how they affect validation and interoperability. In: Proceedings of the European Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Toulouse, 2005. Google Scholar

[31] Wang W P, Zhou D X, Li Q, et al. Multi-level framework for composable simulation based on mda. J Syst Simul, 2007, 19: 4358--4362. Google Scholar

[32] Bell D, Cesare S D, Lycett M, et al. A web services component discovery and deployment architecture for simulation model reuse. research areas. 2006.. Google Scholar

[33] Zhang L. Model engineering for complex system simulation. In: New Ideas, New Theories, Academic Salon Anthology 58: Puzzle and Thinking of Complex System Modeling and Simulation, 2011. Google Scholar

[34] Zeigler B P, Zhang L. Service-Oriented Model Engineering and Simulation for System of Systems Engineering, in Concepts and Methodologies for Modeling and Simulation. Berlin: Springer, 2015. Google Scholar

[35] Zhang L, Zhang X S, Song X, et al. Model engineering for complex system simulation. J Syst Simul, 2013, 25: 2719--2736. Google Scholar

[36] Tolk A, Mittal S. A necessary paradigm change to enable composable cloud-based M&S services. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Savanah, 2014. 356--366. Google Scholar

[37] Fujimoto R M. Research challenges in parallel and distributed simulation. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul, 2016, 26: 1-29 CrossRef Google Scholar

[38] Xiong S. Reusability implementation method of large-scale simulation model architecture. J Mordern Navigation, 2016, 7: 131--136. Google Scholar

[39] Bocciarelli P, D'Ambrogio A, Mastromattei A, et al. Automated development of web-based modeling services for MSaaS platforms. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Model-driven Approaches for Simulation Engineering, Virginia Beach, 2017. Google Scholar

[40] Deng Y, Liu X Y. Research on microservice architecture modeling based on interactive flow modeling language. Softw Guide, 2018, 1: 165--168. Google Scholar

[41] Hawryszkiewycz I T. A meta model for modeling collaborative systems. J Comput Inf Syst, 2016, 45: 63--72. Google Scholar

[42] Wang J, Beu J, Yalamanchili S, et al. Designing configurable, modifiable and reusable components for simulation of multicore systems. In: Proceedings of High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage & Analysis, Salt Lake City, 2013. 472--476. Google Scholar

[43] Scrudder R, Saunders R, Möller B, et al. IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA) — Federate Interface Specification. IEEE Std 1516.1-2000, 2010. Google Scholar

[44] Peng G Z, Mao H C, Wang H W. BOM-based design knowledge representation and reasoning for collaborative product development. J Syst Sci Syst Eng, 2016, 25: 159-176 CrossRef Google Scholar

[45] Pan Q H, Zhang H J, Zhang T F. Study on simulation modeling based on MDA & HLA. J Syst Simul, 2010, 22: 1169--1173. Google Scholar

[46] Nemeth S, Demarest P. Research and development in application of the simulation model portability standard. In: Proceedings of SpaceOps 2010 Conference Delivering on the Dream Hosted by NASA Marshall Space Flight Center and Organized by AIAA, Huntsville, 2010. Google Scholar

[47] Lei Y L, Su N L, Li J J, et al. New simulation model representation specification SMP2 and its key application techniques. Syst Eng-Theory Pract, 2010, 31: 553--572. Google Scholar

[48] Kalman M, Havasi F. Enhanced XML validation using SRML. Int J Web Semant Technol, 2013, 4: 1-18 CrossRef Google Scholar

[49] Fritzson P A. Principles of Object-Oriented Modeling and Simulation with Modelica 3.3. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Google Scholar

[50] Kilgore R A. Open source simulation modeling language (SML). In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington, 2001. 607--613. Google Scholar

[51] Rosa W, Packard T, Krupanand A. COTS integration and estimation for ERP. J Syst Softw, 2013, 86: 538-550 CrossRef Google Scholar

[52] Whalen M W, Murugesan A, Rayadurgam S, et al. Structuring simulink models for verification and reuse. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering, Hyderabad, 2014. 19--24. Google Scholar

[53] Bell D, de Cesare S, Lycett M, et al. Semantic web service architecture for simulation model reuse. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications, Chania, 2007. 129--136. Google Scholar

[54] Tounsi I, Hrichi Z, Kacem M H, et al. Using SoaML models and Event-B specifications for modeling SOA design patterns. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Angers, 2013. 294--301. Google Scholar

[55] Hu J P, Huang L P, Cao B, et al. Executable modeling approach to service oriented architecture using SoaML in conjunction with extended DEVSML. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, Anchorage, 2014. 243--250. Google Scholar

[56] Wang S X, Wainer G. A mashup architecture with modeling and simulation as a service. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, Miami, 2015. Google Scholar

[57] Hu Y, Xiao J, Zhao H, et al. DEVSMO: an ontology of DEVS model representation for model reuse. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, 2013. 4002--4003. Google Scholar

[58] Ju R S, Yang M, Zhong R H, et al. Summary of service oriented modeling and simulation. J Syst Eng Electron, 2013, 35: 1539--1546. Google Scholar

[59] Guo X F. Research on key technologies of distributed simulation based on SOA and HLA. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Zhengzhou: PLA Information Engineering University, 2011. Google Scholar

[60] Chen P. Research on UAV distributed cooperative simulation. Dissertation for Master Degree. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics, 2016. Google Scholar

[61] Peng G Z, Mao H C, Zhang H M. BMRSS: BOM-based multi-resolution simulation system using components. In: Proceedings of Asian Simulation Conference, Singapore, 2013. 485--496. Google Scholar

[62] Zhao J C, Huang L P, Chen J Y, et al. Model reuse oriented simulation cloud service platform design and implementation. J Graph, 2017, 6: 857--864. Google Scholar

[63] Rao D H, Hu X F, Wu L. Research of model integration oriented framework for distributed DEVS/HLA simulation. In: Proceedings of the 14th Chinese Conference on System Simulation Technology and Application, Sanya, 2012. Google Scholar

[64] Kang X Y. Research on reuse and combination of key technologies of simulation models. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2012. Google Scholar

[65] Banks J, Carson J S, Nelson B L, et al. Discrete Event System Simulation. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2010. Google Scholar

[66] Barker M, Zupick N. Revisiting the four CS of managing a successful simulation project. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Las Vegas, 2017. 580--587. Google Scholar

[67] Balci O. Golden rules of verification, validation, testing, and certification of modeling and simulation applications. SCS M&S Mag, 2010, 4: 1--7. Google Scholar

[68] Balci O. A life cycle for modeling and simulation. Simulation, 2012, 88: 870-883 CrossRef Google Scholar

[69] Li T, Li B H, Chai X D, et al. Meta modeling framework for complex product multidiscipline virtual prototyping. J Comput Integr Manuf Syst, 2011, 17: 1178--1186. Google Scholar

[70] Li T, Li B H, Chai X D. Layered simulation service description framework oriented to cloud simulation. J Comput Integr Manuf Syst, 2012, 18: 2091--2098. Google Scholar

[71] Zeigler B P, Praehofer H, Kim T G. Theory of Modeling and Simulation: Integrating Discrete Event and Continuous Complex Dynamic Systems. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000. Google Scholar

[72] Zeigler B P, Nutaro J J. Towards a framework for more robust validation and verification of simulation models for systems of systems. J Defense Model Simul, 2016, 13: 3-16 CrossRef Google Scholar

[73] Zhang X J, Xia H M, Xie G X, et al. Design and implementation of integrated tactical simulation system based on HLA. J Syst Simul, 2010, 22: 2241--2245. Google Scholar

[74] IEEE. IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA) — Framework and Rules. IEEE 1516-2000, 2000. http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1516-2000.html. Google Scholar

[75] IEEE. IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA) — Object Model Template (OMT) Specification. IEEE Std 1516.2-2000, 2001. http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1516.2-2000.html. Google Scholar

[76] IEEE. IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA) — Framework and Rules. IEEE Std 1516-2010, 2010. http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1516-2010.html. Google Scholar

[77] Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO). Base Object Model (BOM) Template Specification. SISO-STD-003.1-DRAFT-V0.12, 2006. https://www.sisostds.org/DigitalLibrary.aspx?Command_Core~Download\&EntryId=30820. Google Scholar

[78] Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO). Guide for Base Object Model (BOM) Use and Implementation. SISO-STD-003.1-2006, 2006. https://www.sisostds.org/DigitalLibrary.aspx?Command_Core~Download\&EntryId=30819. Google Scholar

[79] Yi J, Ma Y P, Zhu B. Research on composition model description method based on BOM. In: Proceedings of 2013 China Command and Control Conference, Beijing, 2013. Google Scholar

[80] Van Tendeloo Y, Vangheluwe H. An evaluation of DEVS simulation tools. Simulation, 2017, 93: 103-121 CrossRef Google Scholar

[81] Zeigler B P, Sarjoughian H S, Duboz R, et al. Guide to Modeling and Simulation of Systems of Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2013. Google Scholar

[82] Schmidt A, Durak U, Rasch C, et al. Model-based testing approach for MATLAB/simulink using system entity structure and experimental frames. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation: DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium, Alexandria, 2015. 69--76. Google Scholar

[83] Tolk A. The next generation of modeling & simulation: integrating big data and deep learning. In: Proceedings of Conference on Summer Computer Simulation, Chicago, 2015. Google Scholar

[84] Balci O, Ball G L, Morse K L, et al. Model reuse, composition, and adaptation. In: Research Challenges in Modeling and Simulation for Engineering Complex Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2017. Google Scholar

[85] Foster S, Thiele B, Cavalcanti A, et al. Towards a UTP semantics for modelica. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Unifying Theories of Programming, Reykjavik, 2016. 44--64. Google Scholar

[86] Friedenthal S, Moore A, Steiner R. A practical guide to SysML. Jung Inst Libr J, 2012, 17: 41--46. Google Scholar

[87] Peng Y, Zhong R H, Huang J, et al. Semantic extended representation approach of DEVS model. J Syst Simul, 2010, 22: 2519--2523. Google Scholar

[88] Seo C, Zeigler B P, Coop R, et al. DEVS modeling and simulation methodology with MS4 Me software tool. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation, San Diego, 2014. Google Scholar

[89] Shi Y, Dong H Q, Lu M H. Research on simulation composability and reusability based on SOA. J Syst Simul, 2014, 26: 1522--1526. Google Scholar

[90] Cai Y. Service-oriented simulation supports key environmental technology research. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2014. Google Scholar

[91] Wang W P, Wang C, Li Q. Simulation model portability modeling and simulation framework based on service oriented architecture. J Comput Integr Manuf Syst, 2011, 17: 2723--2731. Google Scholar

[92] Albagli A N, Falc?o D M, de Rezende J F. Smart grid framework co-simulation using HLA architecture. Electric Power Syst Res, 2016, 130: 22-33 CrossRef Google Scholar

[93] Ribault J, Zacharewicz G. Time-based orchestration of workflow, interoperability with G-Devs/Hla. J Comput Sci, 2015, 10: 126-136 CrossRef Google Scholar

[94] Gao W Q, Kang F J, Zhong L J, et al. Cloud simulation technology based on HLA evolved. J Syst Simul, 2011, 23: 1643--1647. Google Scholar

[95] Katherine D, Morse L, Tolk D A, et al. XMSF as an enabler for NATO M&S. In: Proceedings of NATO Modeling and Simulation Group Conference, Koblenz, 2004. Google Scholar

[96] Kim T, Seo C, Zeigler B P. Web-based distributed network analyzer using a system entity structure over a service-oriented architecture. Simulation, 2010, 86: 155-180 CrossRef Google Scholar

[97] Seo C, Zeigler B P. Simulation model standardization through web services: interoperation and federation on the DEVS/SOA platform. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling and Simulation, Orlando, 2012. Google Scholar

[98] Muqsith M A, Sarjoughian H S, Huang D Z. Simulating adaptive service-oriented software systems. Simulation, 2011, 87: 915-931 CrossRef Google Scholar

[99] Bergero F, Kofman E. PowerDEVS: a tool for hybrid system modeling and real-time simulation. Simulation, 2011, 87: 113-132 CrossRef Google Scholar

[100] Langer P. Adaptable model versioning based on model transformation by demonstration. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Wien: Vienna University of Technology, 2011. Google Scholar

[101] Kappel G, Langer P, Retschitzegger W, et al. Model transformation by-example: a survey of the first wave. In: Conceptual Modelling and its Theoretical Foundations. Berlin: Springer, 2012. 197--215. Google Scholar

[102] Liu H B, Su H Y, Zhang Y B, et al. Study on virtualization-based simulation grid. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, Changsha, 2010. 685--689. Google Scholar

[103] Gao W Q, Kang F J, Zhong L J, et al. Cloud simulation technology based on HLA evolved. J Syst Simul, 2011, 23: 1643--1647. Google Scholar

[104] Cayirci E. Modeling and simulation as a cloud service: a survey. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, 2013. 389--400. Google Scholar

[105] Cayirci E. Configuration schemes for modeling and simulation as a service federation. Simulation, 2013, 89: 1388-1399 CrossRef Google Scholar

[106] Calheiros R N, Ranjan R, de Rose C A F, et al. CloudSim: a novel framework for modeling and simulation of cloud computing infrastructures and services. Comput Sci, 2009,. arXiv Google Scholar

[107] Taylor S J E, Khan A, Morse K L, et al. Grand challenges on the theory of modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation-DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium, San Diego, 2013. Google Scholar

[108] Onggo S, Taylor S, Tulegenov A. The need for cloud-based simulation from the perspective of simulation practitioners. In: Proceedings of the 7th Operational Research Society Simulation Workshop, Worcestershire, 2014. Google Scholar

[109] Bitterman T, Calyam P, Berryman A. Simulation as a service (SMaaS): a cloud-based framework to support the educational use of scientific software. Int J Cloud Comput, 2014, 3: 177-190 CrossRef Google Scholar

[110] Siegfried R, Tom V D B, Cramp A, et al. M&S as a service: expectations and challenges. In: Proceedings of 2014 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshops, Orlando, 2014. Google Scholar

[111] NATO STO. Final Report of NATO MSG-131 “Modelling and Simulation as a Service: New Concepts and Service Oriented Architectures". STO Technical Report STO-TR-MSG-131. Google Scholar

[112] Wang S X, Wainer G. A simulation as a service methodology with application for crowd modeling, simulation and visualization. Simulation, 2015, 91: 71-95 CrossRef Google Scholar

[113] Wainer G, Wang S X. MAMS: mashup architecture with modeling and simulation as a service. J Comput Sci, 2017, 21: 113-131 CrossRef Google Scholar

[114] Li B H, Chai X D, Hou B C, et al. Networked modeling & simulation platform based on concept of cloud computing cloud simulation platform. J Syst Simul, 2009, 21: 5292--5299. Google Scholar

[115] Li B H, Chai X D, Zhang L, et al. New advances of the research on cloud simulation. In: Advanced Methods, Techniques, and Applications in Modeling and Simulation. Berlin: Springer, 2012. 144--163. Google Scholar

[116] Li B H, Chai X D, Hou B, et al. Cloud simulation platform. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Grand Challenges in Modeling & Simulation Conference, Istanbul, 2009. 303--307. Google Scholar

[117] Liu J J, Yu Y L, Zhang L. An overview of conceptual model for simulation and its validation. Procedia Eng, 2011, 24: 152-158 CrossRef Google Scholar

[118] Ayadi M, Affonso R C, Cheutet V. Conceptual model for management of digital factory simulation information. Int J Simul Model, 2013, 12: 107-119 CrossRef Google Scholar

[119] Gracia J, Liem J, Lozano E, et al. Semantic techniques for enabling knowledge reuse in conceptual modelling. In: Proceedings of International Semantic Web Conference, Shanghai, 2010. 82--97. Google Scholar

[120] Robinson S. Conceptual Modeling for Simulation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Google Scholar

[121] Fillottrani P R, Keet C M. Conceptual model interoperability: a metamodel-driven approach. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web, Prague, 2014. Google Scholar

[122] Seo K M, Hong W, Kim T G. Enhancing model composability and reusability for entity-level combat simulation: a conceptual modeling approach. Simulation, 2017, 93: 825-840 CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    Classification of model reuse methods

  • Figure 2

    (Color online) The development of model reuse

  • Figure 3

    (Color online) The evolution of model reuse

  • Figure 4

    (Color online) The model reuse knowledge system framework

  • Figure 5

    Model reuse key technologies research

  • Figure 6

    The reuse-oriented modeling and simulation concept framework

  • Table 1   Model reuse key technology comparison
    Reuse Standards Foucs on Technical Portability Reusable Reuse phase Reuse-oriented
    methods features level modeling ideas
    Reuse based HLA/BOM Unified model Openful, Well Multi-level Design Better
    on model /SMP2 etc. interface standardi- reuse
    standardization zation
    technology
    Reuse based SRML/SML Unified model Platform- Better Multi-level Implement General
    on model /SysML etc. representation independent, reuse
    representation multi-domain
    technology support
    Reuse of build- COTS Unified model Internal General Single-level Execute General
    ing technology /OneSAF etc. interface model library reuse
    based on model-
    ing and simulat-
    ion environment
    Reuse tech- Conceptual Unified concep- Generalization Well Single-level Requirement Well
    nology based model tual modeling and abstraction reuse or design
    on conceptual standard method
    model system
    Service-oriented HLA/SOA Unified service Servitization Better Single-level Design or Better
    model reuse DEVS/SOA ideas reuse execute
    etc.
    Cloud-based MSaaS etc. Unified concep- Standardi- General Multi-level Implement Better
    model reuse tual framework zation reuse or execute