logo

SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 48 , Issue 9 : 1121-1136(2018) https://doi.org/10.1360/N112017-00262

Developing status and some cutting-edge issues of underwater sensor network localization technology

More info
  • ReceivedNov 30, 2017
  • AcceptedFeb 28, 2018
  • PublishedAug 24, 2018

Abstract


Funded by

国家自然科学基金(61531012)

国家自然科学基金(61701132)

黑龙江省留学回国人员择优


References

[1] Rappaport T. Wireless Communications. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1996. Google Scholar

[2] Catipovic J, Deffenbaugh M, Freitag L, et al. An acoustic telemetry system for deep ocean mooring data acquisition and control. In: Proceedings of OCEANS, Seattle, 1989. 3: 887--892. Google Scholar

[3] Merriam F, Frey D, Catipovic J. Performance of an MFSK acoustic telemetry system. In: Proceedings of OCEANS, Newport, 1992. 2: 928. Google Scholar

[4] Stojanovic M, Catipovic J, Proakis J G. Adaptive multichannel combining and equalization for underwater acoustic communications. J Acoust Soc Am, 1993, 94: 1621-1631 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[5] Stojanovic M, Catipovic J A, Proakis J G. Phase-coherent digital communications for underwater acoustic channels. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 1994, 19: 100-111 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[6] Li B S, Zhou S L, Stojanovic M, et al. Pilot-tone based ZP-OFDM demodulation for an underwater acoustic channel. In: Proceedings of OCEANS, Boston, 2006. 1--5. Google Scholar

[7] Li B S, Huang J, Zhou S L, et al. MIMO-OFDM for high rate underwater acoustic communications. IEEE J Oce Eng, 2009, 34: 635--644. Google Scholar

[8] Choi J W, Riedl T J, Kim K. Adaptive Linear Turbo Equalization Over Doubly Selective Channels. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 2011, 36: 473-489 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[9] Song H C, Hodgkiss W S, Kuperman W A. Spatial diversity in passive time reversal communications. J Acoust Soc Am, 2006, 120: 2067-2076 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[10] Tao J, Zheng Y R, Xiao C. Robust MIMO Underwater Acoustic Communications Using Turbo Block Decision-Feedback Equalization. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 2010, 35: 948-960 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[11] Hoang T D, Le L B, Le-Ngoc T. Joint sub-channel and power allocation for D2D communications for celluar networks. In: Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Istanbul, 2014. 1338--1343. Google Scholar

[12] Roy T N. Deployable autonomous distributed system: future naval capability in undersea warfare. SSC San Diego Biennial Rev, 2003, 3: 181--185. Google Scholar

[13] Rice J A. Enabling undersea forceNet with seaweb acoustic networks. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Technology and the Mine Problem, Monterey, 2002. 174--180. Google Scholar

[14] Freitag L E, Merriam J, Frye D, et al. A long-term deep-water acoustic telemetry experiment. In: Proceedings of OCEANS, Hawaii, 1991. 1: 254--260. Google Scholar

[15] Stojanovic M, Catipovic J, Proakis J G. An algorithm for multichannel coherent digital communication over long range underwater acoustic telemetry channels. In: Proceedings of OCEANS, Newport, 1992. 2: 577--582. Google Scholar

[16] Zhou S l, Giannakis G B. Finite-alphabet based channel estimation for OFDM and related multicarrier systems. IEEE Trans Commun, 2015, 49: 1402--1414. Google Scholar

[17] Riedl T, Singer A. MUST-READ: multichannel sample-by-sample turbo resampling equalization and decoding. In: Proceedings of OCEANS, Bergen, 2013. 1--5. Google Scholar

[18] Edelmann G F, Hodgkiss W S, Kim S, et al. Underwater acoustic communication using time reversal. In: Proceedings of OCEANS, Honolulu, 2001. 4: 2231--2235. Google Scholar

[19] Rice J A. Seaweb network for FRONT oceanographic sensors. San Diego: Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, 2002. 30--35. Google Scholar

[20] Petrioli C, Petroccia R, Potter J R. The SUNSET framework for simulation, emulation and at-sea testing of underwater wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 2015, 34: 224-238 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Toso G, Masiero R, Casari P, et al. Field experiments for dynamic source routing: S2C EvoLogics modems run the SUN protocol using the DESERT underwater libraries. In: Proceedings of OCEANS, Hampton Roads, 2012. 1--10. Google Scholar

[22] Peng Z, Zhou Z, Cui J H, et al. Aqua-Net: an underwater sensor network architecture: design, implementation, and initial testing. In: Proceedings of MTS/IEEE OCEANS, Biloxi, 2009. 1--8. Google Scholar

[23] Wang Y, Liu Y, Guo Z. Three-dimensional ocean sensor networks: A survey. J Ocean Univ China, 2012, 11: 436-450 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[24] Qiao G, Liu S, Sun Z, et al. Full-duplex, multi-user and parameter reconfigurable underwater acoustic communication modem. In: Proceedings of OCEANS, San Diego, 2014. 1--8. Google Scholar

[25] 汪生泉. 水声传感器网络MAC层协议研究. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2015. Google Scholar

[26] Ma L, Qiao G, Liu S. HEU OFDM-modem for underwater acoustic communication and networking. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Underwater Networks $\&$ Systems, Rome, 2014. 12--14. Google Scholar

[27] Liu S, Ma L, Hui L, et al. Design and implementation of OFDM underwater acoustic communication algorithm based on OMAP-L138. In: Proceedings of International Conference Underwater Networks & Systems, Rome, 2014. 12. Google Scholar

[28] Liu S, Ma T, Qiao G. Biologically inspired covert underwater acoustic communication by mimicking dolphin whistles. Appl Acoustics, 2017, 120: 120-128 CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Qiao G, Zhao Y, Liu S, et al. Dolphin sounds-inspired covert underwater acoustic communication and micro-modem. Sensors, 2017, 17: 2447. Google Scholar

[30] Li S J, Bao G S, Wu S G. A practical overview and prospect of acoustic positioning technology. Ocean Tech, 2005, 24: 130--135. Google Scholar

[31] 孙思萍. 水声定位技术的应用. 海洋技术学报, 1993, 4: 31--34. Google Scholar

[32] Sun D J, Zheng C E, Qian H B, et al. The application of underwater acoustic positioning systems in ocean engineering. Tech Acoust, 2012, 31: 125--132. Google Scholar

[33] Sun D J, Zheng C E. Study on the development trend of underwater acoustic navigation and positioning technologies. J Ocean Tech, 2015, 34: 64--68. Google Scholar

[34] Vickery K. Acoustic positioning systems. A practical overview of current systems. In: Proceedings of the 1998 Workshop on Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, Cambridge, 1998. 5--17. Google Scholar

[35] Vickery K. Acoustic positioning systems. New concepts-the future. In: Proceedings of the 1998 Workshop on Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, Cambridge, 1998. 103--110. Google Scholar

[36] 张光亮, 方世良, 徐步安. 单频脉冲水声信号的精密时延估计研究. 见: 2008年全国声学学术会议, 2008. Google Scholar

[37] Coates R F W. Underwater acoustic systems. London: Macmillan Education, 1990. Google Scholar

[38] Burdic W S. Underwater acoustic system analysis. J Acoust Soc Am, 1984, 76: 996. Google Scholar

[39] Thomson D, Elson S. New generation acoustic positioning systems. In: Prcoeedings of OCEANS, Biloxi, 2002. 3: 1312--1318. Google Scholar

[40] Benslimane A, Saad C, Konig J, et al. Cooperative localization techniques for wireless sensor networks: free, signal and angle based techniques. Wirel Commun Mobile Comput, 2015, 14: 1627--1646. Google Scholar

[41] Luo H J, Guo Z W, Dong W, et al. LDB: localization with directional beacons for sparse 3D underwater acoustic sensor networks. J Netw, 2010, 5: 28--38. Google Scholar

[42] Pandey O J, Sharan R, Hegde R M. Localization in wireless sensor networks using visible light in non-line of sight conditions. Wirel Personal Commun, 2017, 6: 1--21. Google Scholar

[43] 科技日报. 国产高精度“超短基线定位系统"打破国外垄断, 2014. Google Scholar

[44] 光明日报. “蛟龙"号用上国产高精度超短基线定位系统, 2014. Google Scholar

[45] 中国海洋报. 2015年度中国海洋十大科技进展发布, 2016. Google Scholar

[46] 刘健, 徐会希. 潜龙一号:深海里的中国龙. 科技纵览, 2014, 6: 92--93. Google Scholar

[47] Ji D X, Liu J, Chen X Z, et al. Fast and accurate AUV positioning using acoustic beacons of LBL system. Tech Acoust, 2009, 28: 476--479. Google Scholar

[48] Su R Y, Venkatesan R, Li C. A new node coordination scheme for data gathering in underwater acoustic sensor networks using autonomous underwater vehicle. In: Proceedings of Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Shanghai, 2013. 4370--4374. Google Scholar

[49] Hollinger G A, Choudhary S, Qarabaqi P. Underwater Data Collection Using Robotic Sensor Networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2012, 30: 899-911 CrossRef Google Scholar

[50] Fazel F, Stojanovic M. Resource allocation for hierarchical underwater sensor networks. In: Proceedings of Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA), San Diego, 2013. 1--10. Google Scholar

[51] Hajihoseini Gazestani A, Shahbazian R, Ghorashi S A. Decentralized Consensus Based Target Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Pers Commun, 2017, 97: 3587-3599 CrossRef Google Scholar

[52] Han G, Jiang J, Chao J. Path planning for a group of mobile anchor nodes based on regular triangles in wireless sensor networks. Neurocomputing, 2017, 270: 198-208 CrossRef Google Scholar

[53] Sharma G, Kumar A. Dynamic range normal bisector localization algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun, 2017, 8: 1--21. Google Scholar

[54] Zhang X R, Xiong W L, Xu B G. A computationally efficient received signal strength based localization algorithm in closed-form for wireless sensor network. Neural Process Lett, 2017, 3: 1--15. Google Scholar

[55] Kumar G, Rai M K, Saha R. Securing range free localization against wormhole attack using distance estimation and maximum likelihood estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks. J Network Comput Appl, 2017, 99: 10-16 CrossRef Google Scholar

[56] Liu L, Du J, Guo D. A clustering approach for error beacon filtering in underwater wireless sensor networks. Int J Distributed Sens Networks, 2016, 12: 155014771668179 CrossRef Google Scholar

[57] Chandrasekhar V, Seah W. An area localization scheme for underwater sensor networks. In: Proceedings of OCEANS, Singapore, 2007. 1--8. Google Scholar

[58] Aziz M, Tayarani-N M H, Meybodi M R. A two-objective memetic approach for the node localization problem in wireless sensor networks. Genet Program Evolvable Mach, 2016, 17: 321-358 CrossRef Google Scholar

[59] Xiuzhen Cheng , Haining Shu , Qilian Liang . Silent Positioning in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2008, 57: 1756-1766 CrossRef Google Scholar

[60] Shang F, Jiang Y, Xiong A. A Node Localization Algorithm Based on Multi-Granularity Regional Division and the Lagrange Multiplier Method in Wireless Sensor Networks.. Sensors, 2016, 16: 1934 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[61] Carroll P, Mahmood K, Zhou S. On-Demand Asynchronous Localization for Underwater Sensor Networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2014, 62: 3337-3348 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[62] Teymorian A Y, Cheng W, Ma L. 3D Underwater Sensor Network Localization. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput, 2009, 8: 1610-1621 CrossRef Google Scholar

[63] Chizari H, Poston T, Abd Razak S. Local coverage measurement algorithm in GPS-free wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 2014, 23: 1-17 CrossRef Google Scholar

[64] Zhou Y, He J H, Chen K, et al. An area localization scheme for large scale underwater wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 2009 WRI International Conference on Communications and Mobile Computing. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2009. 543--547. Google Scholar

[65] Liu W, Wang D, Jiang H. An Approximate Convex Decomposition Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network Localization in Arbitrary-Shaped Fields. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst, 2015, 26: 3264-3274 CrossRef Google Scholar

[66] Erol M, Vieira L M, Gerla M. AUV-aided localization for underwater sensor networks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems and Applications (WASA 2007), Chicago, 2007. 44--54. Google Scholar

[67] Luo H J, Zhao Y Y, Guo Z W, et al. UDB: using directional beacons for localization in underwater sensor networks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Melbourne, 2008. 551--558. Google Scholar

[68] Luo H J, Guo Z W, Dong W, et al. LDB: localization with directional beacons for sparse 3D underwater acoustic sensor networks. J Netw, 2010, 5: 28--38. Google Scholar

[69] Improved Object Localization Using Accurate Distance Estimation in Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10: e0141558 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[70] You K, Yang W, Han R. The Video Collaborative Localization of a Miner's Lamp Based on Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks for Underground Coal Mines.. Sensors, 2015, 15: 25103-25122 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[71] Han G, Zhang C, Liu T. MANCL: a multi-anchor nodes collaborative localization algorithm for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Wirel Commun Mob Comput, 2016, 16: 682-702 CrossRef Google Scholar

[72] Zhao R Q, Shen X H, Gao J J, et al. Localization in underwater acoustic networks based on double rates. In: Proceedings of OCEANS, Hampton Roads, 2012. 1--4. Google Scholar

[73] Zhu Z W, Guan W B, Liu L F, et al. A multi-hop localization algorithm in underwater wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), Hefei, 2014. 1--6. Google Scholar

[74] Liu J, Wang Z H, Zuba M, et al. JSL: joint time synchronization and localization design with stratification compensation in mobile underwater sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), Seoul, 2012. 317--325. Google Scholar

[75] Liu J, Wang Z, Cui J H. A Joint Time Synchronization and Localization Design for Mobile Underwater Sensor Networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput, 2016, 15: 530-543 CrossRef Google Scholar

[76] Diamant R, Lampe L. Underwater Localization with Time-Synchronization and Propagation Speed Uncertainties. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput, 2013, 12: 1257-1269 CrossRef Google Scholar

[77] Yi J W, Mirza D, Schurgers C, et al. Joint time synchronization and tracking for mobile underwater systems. Ad Hoc Netw, 2013, 34: 1--8. Google Scholar

[78] Yi J W, Mirza D, Kastner R, et al. ToA-TS: time of arrival based joint time synchronization and tracking for mobile underwater systems. Ad Hoc Netw, 2015, 211--223. Google Scholar

[79] Xia Y, Wang Y, Ma X, et al. Joint time synchronization and localization for underwater acoustic sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Underwater Networks $\&$ Systems. New York: ACM, 2015. Google Scholar

[80] He C F, Wang Y Y, Chen C, et al. Underwater acoustic localization with uncertainties in propagation speed and time synchronization. In: Proceedings of MTS/IEEE Monterey OCEANS, Monterey, 2016. 1--5. Google Scholar

[81] Ramezani H, Leus G. Localization Packet Scheduling for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2015, 33: 1345-1356 CrossRef Google Scholar

[82] Ramezani H, Fazel F, Stojanovic M. Collision Tolerant and Collision Free Packet Scheduling for Underwater Acoustic Localization. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2015, 14: 2584-2595 CrossRef Google Scholar

[83] Zhang S L, Zhang Q, Liu M Q, et al. A multi-hop reverse localization scheme for underwater wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Chinese Control Conference, Xi'an, 2013. 7383--7388. Google Scholar

[84] Liu B, Chen H, Zhong Z. Asymmetrical Round Trip Based Synchronization-Free Localization in Large-Scale Underwater Sensor Networks. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2010, 9: 3532-3542 CrossRef Google Scholar

[85] Han Y F, Zheng Y R, Sun D J. Measurement error impact on node localization of large scale underwater sensor networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE 82nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2015-Fall), Boston, 2015. Google Scholar

[86] Guo Z, Guo Y, Hong F. Perpendicular Intersection: Locating Wireless Sensors With Mobile Beacon. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2010, 59: 3501-3509 CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    (Color online) Factors affecting sensor node distance and azimuth measurement accuracy

  • Figure 2

    (Color online) Underwater reference node location and time acquisition method

  • Figure 3

    Principle of the work

  • Figure 4

    (Color online) Avoid synchronous underwater network positioning principle. (a) Cheng and Zhou programs; (b) improvement programs

  • Figure 5

    Variation of temperature and depth in different regions

  • Figure 6

    Two-dimensional positioning of the basic principles

  • Table 1   Research status quo
    Researchers Research institute Research technology
    Freitag $\&$ Merriam [12] Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution MFSK
    Stojanovic $\&$ Catipovic [13] Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Coherent communication (DFE based
    on embedded PLL)
    Zhou $\&$ Giannakis [14] University of Minneapolis OFDM
    Riedl $\&$ Singer [15] University of Illinois Single carrier (Multi-channel iterative
    turbo equalization)
    Edelmann $\&$ Hodgkiss [16] University of California Single carrier (Array-based equalization
    technique)
    Zheng $\&$ Xiao [10] University of Missouri-Columbia Single carrier (Equalization technique in
    the application of improved linear MMSE
    in MIMO communication system)