logo

SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, Volume 48 , Issue 4 : 406-418(2018) https://doi.org/10.1360/N112017-00217

Interaction paradigm in intelligent systems

More info
  • ReceivedNov 2, 2017
  • AcceptedJan 29, 2018
  • PublishedApr 8, 2018

Abstract


Funded by

国家自然科学基金(61572344)

国家自然科学基金(61772468)

国家自然科学基金(61303162)

北京市社会科学基金(16YTC033)


References

[1] Shi L, Deng C Z, Dai G Z. Implementation of PGIS: a type of Post-WIMP user interface. J Image Graph, 2010, 15: 985--992. Google Scholar

[2] El-Assady M, Sevastjanova R, Sperrle F, et al. Progressive learning of topic modeling parameters: a visual analytics framework. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph, 2017, 24: 382--391. Google Scholar

[3] Kuhn T S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962. Google Scholar

[4] Kuhn T S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. In: Jin W L, Hu X H, eds. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2004. Google Scholar

[5] Gray J. eScience: a transformed scientific method. In: The fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. 2009. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/fourth-paradigm-data-intensive-scientific-discovery/. Google Scholar

[6] Harrison S, Sengers P, Tatar D. Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting Comput, 2011, 23: 385-392 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Card S, Moran T, Newell A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates, 1983. Google Scholar

[8] Carroll J M. HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: Psychology as a Science of Design. Annu Rev Psychol, 1997, 48: 61-83 CrossRef Google Scholar

[9] Dong S H, Chen M, Luo J, et al. The model, method and instance of multimodal user interface. Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekinensis, 1998, 34: 231--239. Google Scholar

[10] Dai G Z, Tian F. Pen-based User Interface. Heifei: China Science and Technology University Press, 2014. Google Scholar

[11] Green M, Jacob R. SIGGRAPH '90 Workshop report: software architectures and metaphors for non-WIMP user interfaces. SIGGRAPH Comput Graph, 1991, 25: 229-235 CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Nielsen J. Noncommand user interfaces. Commun ACM, 1993, 36: 83--99. Google Scholar

[13] James J. Word 2007: lessons on usability. http://www.techrepublic.com/article/word-2007-lessons-on-usability/. Google Scholar

[14] Norman D A. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books, 1998. Google Scholar

[15] Gibson J J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979. Google Scholar

[16] Liu Z X. Interpretation of the theory of metaphor. J Anhui Univ Technol (Soc Sci), 2007, 24: 126--127. Google Scholar

[17] Wang M. An exploratory study of the understanding of user interface metaphors: the case of metaphoric icons. Dissertation for Master Degree. Wuhan: Central China University of Science and Technology, 2011. Google Scholar

[18] Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981. Google Scholar

[19] Carroll J M. Human computer interaction — brief intro. In: the Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. 2nd ed. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed. Google Scholar

[20] Szabó K. Metaphors and the user interface. 1995. http://www.katalinszabo.com/metaphor.htm. Google Scholar

[21] Ark W, Dryer D, Selker T, et al. Representation matters: the effect of 3D objects and a spatial metaphor in a graphical user interface. In: People and Computers XIII. Longdon: Springer, 1998. Google Scholar

[22] Lyu F, Tian F. Reality-Based Interaction: Method and Practice. Beijing: Electronic Industry Press, 2017. Google Scholar

[23] Shneiderman B. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. 2nd ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1992. Google Scholar

[24] Dam A V. Post-wimp user interfaces. Commun ACM, 1997, 40: 63--67. Google Scholar

[25] Jacob R J K, Girouard A, Hirshfield L M, et al. Reality-based interaction: a framework for post-wimp interfaces. In: Proceeding of the 26th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, 2008. 201--210. Google Scholar

[26] Yuanchun Shi , Weikai Xie , Guangyou Xu . The smart classroom: merging technologies for seamless tele-education. IEEE Pervasive Comput, 2003, 2: 47-55 CrossRef Google Scholar

[27] Aldrich F K. Smart homes: past, present and future. In: Inside the Smart Home. London: Springer, 2003, 17--39. Google Scholar

[28] Davies C, White J, McAllister A, et al. A toolkit for building collaborative immersive multi-surface applications. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS'16), Niagara Falls, 2016. 485--488. Google Scholar

[29] Hall E T. The Hidden Dimension. 2nd ed. New York: Anchor Press, 1990. Google Scholar

[30] Cohen M A, Horowitz T S, Wolfe J M. Auditory recognition memory is inferior to visual recognition memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106: 6008-6010 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[31] Grice H P. Logic and conversation. In: Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 1975. Google Scholar

[32] Dumas B, Lalanne D, Oviatt S. Multimodal interfaces: a survey of principles, models and frameworks. In: Human Machine Interaction. Berlin: Springer, 2009. Google Scholar