logo

SCIENTIA SINICA Vitae, Volume 45 , Issue 4 : 325-339(2015) https://doi.org/10.1360/N052014-00244

Plant Functional Traits—Concepts, Applications and Future Directions

More info
  • ReceivedSep 26, 2014
  • AcceptedDec 10, 2014
  • PublishedApr 20, 2015

Abstract


References

[1] Diaz S, Cabido M, Casanoves F. Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. J Veg Sci, 1998, 9: 113-122. Google Scholar

[2] Diaz S, Cabido M, Zak M, et al. Plant functional traits, ecosystem structure and land-use history along a climatic gradient in central-western Argentina. J Veg Sci, 1999, 10: 651-660. Google Scholar

[3] Weiher E, van der Werf A, Thompson K, et al. Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J Veg Sci, 1999, 10: 609-620. Google Scholar

[4] Cornelissen J H C, Lavorel S, Garnier E, et al. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot, 2003, 51: 335-380. Google Scholar

[5] Reich P B, Wright I J, Cavender-Bares J, et al. The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. Int J Plant Sci, 2003, 164: S143-S164. Google Scholar

[6] Lavorel S, Garnier E. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol, 2002, 16: 545-556. Google Scholar

[7] Westoby M, Falster D S, Moles A T, et al. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 2002, 33: 125-159. Google Scholar

[8] Wright S J, Kitajima K, Kraft N J B, et al. Functional traits and the growth-mortality trade-off in tropical trees. Ecology, 2010, 91: 3664-3674. Google Scholar

[9] Diaz S, Hodgson J G, Thompson K, et al. The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. J Veg Sci, 2004, 15: 295-304. Google Scholar

[10] Westoby M, Wright I J. Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol, 2006, 21: 261-268. Google Scholar

[11] Wright I J, Ackerly D D, Bongers F, et al. Relationships among ecologically important dimensions of plant trait variation in seven Neotropical forests. Ann Bot, 2007, 99: 1003-1015. Google Scholar

[12] Wright I J, Reich P B, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 2004, 428: 821-827. Google Scholar

[13] Reich P B, Oleksyn J. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 11001-11006. Google Scholar

[14] Moles A T, Ackerly D D, Tweddle J C, et al. Global patterns in seed size. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2007, 16: 109-116. Google Scholar

[15] Moles A T, Warton D I, Warman L, et al. Global patterns in plant height. J Ecol, 2009, 97: 923-932. Google Scholar

[16] Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, et al. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol Lett, 2009, 12: 351-366. Google Scholar

[17] Westoby M. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil, 1998, 199: 213-227. Google Scholar

[18] Golodets C, Sternberg M, Kigel J. A community-level test of the leaf-height-seed ecology strategy scheme in relation to grazing conditions. J Veg Sci, 2009, 20: 392-402. Google Scholar

[19] Laughlin D C, Leppert J J, Moore M M, et al. A multi-trait test of the leaf-height-seed plant strategy scheme with 133 species from a pine forest flora. Funct Ecol, 2010, 24: 493-501. Google Scholar

[20] Moles A T, Falster D S, Leishman M R, et al. Small-seeded species produce more seeds per square metre of canopy per year, but not per individual per lifetime. J Ecol, 2004, 92: 384-396. Google Scholar

[21] Moles A T, Westoby M. Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle. Oikos, 2006, 113: 91-105. Google Scholar

[22] Moles A T, Westoby M. Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature. J Ecol, 2004, 92: 372-383. Google Scholar

[23] Poorter L, McDonald I, Alarcon A, et al. The importance of wood traits and hydraulic conductance for the performance and life history strategies of 42 rainforest tree species. New Phytol, 2010, 185: 481-492. Google Scholar

[24] van Gelder H A, Poorter L, Sterck F J. Wood mechanics, allometry, and life-history variation in a tropical rain forest tree community. New Phytol, 2006, 171: 367-378. Google Scholar

[25] Swenson N G, Enquist B J. The relationship between stem and branch wood specific gravity and the ability of each measure to predict leaf area. Am J Bot, 2008, 95: 516-519. Google Scholar

[26] Poorter L, Wright S J, Paz H, et al. Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five Neotropical forests. Ecology, 2008, 89: 1908-1920. Google Scholar

[27] Kraft N J B, Metz M R, Condit R S, et al. The relationship between wood density and mortality in a global tropical forest data set. New Phytol, 2010, 188: 1124-1136. Google Scholar

[28] Bolmgren K, Cowan P D. Time-size tradeoffs: a phylogenetic comparative study of flowering time, plant height and seed mass in a north-temperate flora. Oikos, 2008, 117: 424-429. Google Scholar

[29] Kushwaha C P, Tripathi S K, Singh K P. Tree specific traits affect flowering time in Indian dry tropical forest. Plant Ecol, 2011, 212: 985-998. Google Scholar

[30] Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Midgley G, et al. Relating plant traits and species distributions along bioclimatic gradients for 88 Leucadendron taxa. Ecology, 2004, 85: 1688-1699. Google Scholar

[31] Aerts R, Chapin F S. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res, 2000, 30: 1-67. Google Scholar

[32] Wright I J, Reich P B, Cornelissen J H C, et al. Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. New Phytol, 2005, 166: 485-496. Google Scholar

[33] Meng T T, Ni J, Harrison S P. Plant morphometric traits and climate gradients in northern China: a meta-analysis using quadrat and flora data. Ann Bot, 2009, 104: 1217-1229. Google Scholar

[34] Niinemets U. Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dry mass per area, density, and thickness in trees and shrubs. Ecology, 2001, 82: 453-469. Google Scholar

[35] Murray B R, Brown A H D, Dickman C R, et al. Geographical gradients in seed mass in relation to climate. J Biogeogr, 2004, 31: 379-388. Google Scholar

[36] Markesteijn L, Poorter L. Seedling root morphology and biomass allocation of 62 tropical tree species in relation to drought- and shade-tolerance. J Ecol, 2009, 97: 311-325. Google Scholar

[37] Poorter L, Markesteijn L. Seedling traits determine drought tolerance of tropical tree species. Biotropica, 2008, 40: 321-331. Google Scholar

[38] Fonseca C R, Overton J M, Collins B, et al. Shifts in trait-combinations along rainfall and phosphorus gradients. J Ecol, 2000, 88: 964-977. Google Scholar

[39] Maharjan S K, Poorter L, Holmgren M, et al. Plant functional traits and the distribution of West African rain forest trees along the rainfall gradient. Biotropica, 2011, 43: 552-561. Google Scholar

[40] Wright I J, Reich P B, Westoby M. Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Funct Ecol, 2001, 15: 423-434. Google Scholar

[41] Santiago L S, Kitajima K, Wright S J, et al. Coordinated changes in photosynthesis, water relations and leaf nutritional traits of canopy trees along a precipitation gradient in lowland tropical forest. Oecologia, 2004, 139: 495-502. Google Scholar

[42] Niinemets U. The controversy over traits conferring shade-tolerance in trees: ontogenetic changes revisited. J Ecol, 2006, 94: 464-470. Google Scholar

[43] Rozendaal D M A, Hurtado V H, Poorter L. Plasticity in leaf traits of 38 tropical tree species in response to light; relationships with light demand and adult stature. Funct Ecol, 2006, 20: 207-216. Google Scholar

[44] Sterck F J, Bongers F. Crown development in tropical rain forest trees: patterns with tree height and light availability. J Ecol, 2001, 89: 1-13. Google Scholar

[45] Poorter L, Bongers F, Sterck F J, et al. Architecture of 53 rain forest tree species differing in adult stature and shade tolerance. Ecology, 2003, 84: 602-608. Google Scholar

[46] Wright J P, Naeem S, Hector A, et al. Conventional functional classification schemes underestimate the relationship with ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett, 2006, 9: 111-120. Google Scholar

[47] 冯秋红, 史作民, 董莉莉. 植物功能性状对环境的响应及其应用. 林业科学, 2008, 44: 125-131. Google Scholar

[48] 孟婷婷, 倪健, 王国宏. 植物功能性状与环境和生态系统功能. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31: 150-165. Google Scholar

[49] Chave J, Muller-Landau H C, Baker T R, et al. Regional and phylogenetic variation of wood density across 2456 Neotropical tree species. Ecol Appl, 2006, 16: 2356-2367. Google Scholar

[50] Cornwell W K, Schwilk D W, Ackerly D D. A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology, 2006, 87: 1465-1471. Google Scholar

[51] Cornwell W K, Ackerly D D. Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecol Monogr, 2009, 79: 109-126. Google Scholar

[52] Pellissier L, Fournier B, Guisan A, et al. Plant traits co-vary with altitude in grasslands and forests in the European Alps. Plant Ecol, 2010, 211: 351-365. Google Scholar

[53] Fisher J B, Goldstein G, Jones T J, et al. Wood vessel diameter is related to elevation and genotype in the Hawaiian tree Metrosideros polymorpha (Myrtaceae). Am J Bot, 2007, 94: 709-715. Google Scholar

[54] Craine J M, Lee W G. Covariation in leaf and root traits for native and non-native grasses along an altitudinal gradient in New Zealand. Oecologia, 2003, 134: 471-478. Google Scholar

[55] Hanba Y T, Noma N, Umeki K. Relationship between leaf characteristics, tree sizes and species distribution along a slope in a warm temperate forest. Ecol Res, 2000, 15: 393-403. Google Scholar

[56] Ackerly D D, Knight C A, Weiss S B, et al. Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses. Oecologia, 2002, 130: 449-457. Google Scholar

[57] Ordonez J C, van Bodegom P M, Witte J P M, et al. A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2009, 18: 137-149. Google Scholar

[58] Bonser S P, Ladd B, Monro K, et al. The adaptive value of functional and life-history traits across fertility treatments in an annual plant. Ann Bot, 2010, 106: 979-988. Google Scholar

[59] Diaz S, Cabido M. Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol, 2001, 16: 646-655. Google Scholar

[60] Petchey O L, Gaston K J. Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett, 2002, 5: 402-411. Google Scholar

[61] Villeger S, Mason N W H, Mouillot D. New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology, 2008, 89: 2290-2301. Google Scholar

[62] Laliberte E, Legendre P. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology, 2010, 91: 299-305. Google Scholar

[63] 旭阳, 胡耀升, 刘艳红. 长白山阔叶红松林不同群落类型的植物功能性状与功能多样性. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2014, 42: 77-84. Google Scholar

[64] Bohnke M, Krober W, Welk E, et al. Maintenance of constant functional diversity during secondary succession of a subtropical forest in China. J Veg Sci, 2014, 25: 897-911. Google Scholar

[65] Swenson N G, Enquist B J, Pither J, et al. The biogeography and filtering of woody plant functional diversity in North and South America. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2012, 21: 798-808. Google Scholar

[66] Albert C H, de Bello F, Boulangeat I, et al. On the importance of intraspecific variability for the quantification of functional diversity. Oikos, 2012, 121: 116-126. Google Scholar

[67] Conti G, Diaz S. Plant functional diversity and carbon storage—an empirical test in semi-arid forest ecosystems. J Ecol, 2013, 101: 18-28. Google Scholar

[68] Flynn D F B, Mirotchnick N, Jain M, et al. Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity-ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology, 2011, 92: 1573-1581. Google Scholar

[69] Flynn D F B, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, et al. Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett, 2009, 12: 22-33. Google Scholar

[70] Ackerly D D, Cornwell W K. A trait-based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within- and among-community components. Ecol Lett, 2007, 10: 135-145. Google Scholar

[71] Mouillot D, Mason N W H, Wilson J B. Is the abundance of species determined by their functional traits? A new method with a test using plant communities. Oecologia, 2007, 152: 729-737. Google Scholar

[72] Cingolani A M, Cabido M, Gurvich D E, et al. Filtering processes in the assembly of plant communities: are species presence and abundance driven by the same traits? J Veg Sci, 2007, 18: 911-920. Google Scholar

[73] Kraft N J B, Valencia R, Ackerly D D. Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an amazonian forest. Science, 2008, 322: 580-582. Google Scholar

[74] Kraft N J B, Ackerly D D. Functional trait and phylogenetic tests of community assembly across spatial scales in an Amazonian forest. Ecol Monogr, 2010, 80: 401-422. Google Scholar

[75] Lebrija-Trejos E, Perez-Garcia E A, Meave J A, et al. Functional traits and environmental filtering drive community assembly in a species-rich tropical system. Ecology, 2010, 91: 386-398. Google Scholar

[76] Liu X J, Swenson N G, Zhang J L, et al. The environment and space, not phylogeny, determine trait dispersion in a subtropical forest. Funct Ecol, 2013, 27: 264-272. Google Scholar

[77] Adler P B, Fajardo A, Kleinhesselink A R, et al. Trait-based tests of coexistence mechanisms. Ecol Lett, 2013, 16: 1294-1306. Google Scholar

[78] Swenson N G, Enquist B J. Opposing assembly mechanisms in a Neotropical dry forest: implications for phylogenetic and functional community ecology. Ecology, 2009, 90: 2161-2170. Google Scholar

[79] Paine C E T, Baraloto C, Chave J, et al. Functional traits of individual trees reveal ecological constraints on community assembly in tropical rain forests. Oikos, 2011, 120: 720-727. Google Scholar

[80] Enquist B J, Kerkhoff A J, Stark S C, et al. A general integrative model for scaling plant growth, carbon flux, and functional trait spectra. Nature, 2007, 449: 218-222. Google Scholar

[81] Ruger N, Wirth C, Wright S J, et al. Functional traits explain light and size response of growth rates in tropical tree species. Ecology, 2012, 93: 2626-2636. Google Scholar

[82] Sterck F J, Martinez-Vilalta J, Mencuccini M, et al. Understanding trait interactions and their impacts on growth in Scots pine branches across Europe. Funct Ecol, 2012, 26: 541-549. Google Scholar

[83] Herault B, Bachelot B, Poorter L, et al. Functional traits shape ontogenetic growth trajectories of rain forest tree species. J Ecol, 2011, 99: 1431-1440. Google Scholar

[84] Martinez-Vilalta J, Mencuccini M, Vayreda J, et al. Interspecific variation in functional traits, not climatic differences among species ranges, determines demographic rates across 44 temperate and Mediterranean tree species. J Ecol, 2010, 98: 1462-1475. Google Scholar

[85] Cavender-Bares J, Kozak K H, Fine P V A, et al. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett, 2009, 12: 693-715. Google Scholar

[86] McGill B J, Enquist B J, Weiher E, et al. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol, 2006, 21: 178-185. Google Scholar

[87] Webb C O. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am Nat, 2000, 156: 145-155. Google Scholar

[88] Cavender-Bares J, Ackerly D D, Baum D A, et al. Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. Am Nat, 2004, 163: 823-843. Google Scholar

[89] Losos J B. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol Lett, 2008, 11: 995-1003. Google Scholar

[90] Uriarte M, Swenson N G, Chazdon R L, et al. Trait similarity, shared ancestry and the structure of neighbourhood interactions in a subtropical wet forest: implications for community assembly. Ecol Lett, 2010, 13: 1503-1514. Google Scholar

[91] Hardy O J, Couteron P, Munoz F, et al. Phylogenetic turnover in tropical tree communities: impact of environmental filtering, biogeography and mesoclimatic niche conservatism. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2012, 21: 1007-1016. Google Scholar

[92] Cadotte M W, Cavender-Bares J, Tilman D, et al. Using phylogenetic, functional and trait diversity to understand patterns of plant community productivity. PLoS One, 2009, 4: e5695. Google Scholar

[93] Mayfield M M, Levine J M. Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. Ecol Lett, 2010, 13: 1085-1093. Google Scholar

[94] Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat, 1985, 125: 1-15. Google Scholar

[95] Prinzing A, Reiffers R, Braakhekke W G, et al. Less lineages—more trait variation: phylogenetically clustered plant communities are functionally more diverse. Ecol Lett, 2008, 11: 809-819. Google Scholar

[96] Baraloto C, Hardy O J, Paine C E T, et al. Using functional traits and phylogenetic trees to examine the assembly of tropical tree communities. J Ecol, 2012, 100: 690-701. Google Scholar

[97] Pavoine S, Vela E, Gachet S, et al. Linking patterns in phylogeny, traits, abiotic variables and space: a novel approach to linking environmental filtering and plant community assembly. J Ecol, 2011, 99: 165-175. Google Scholar

[98] Petchey O L, Gaston K J. Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett, 2006, 9: 741-758. Google Scholar

[99] Roscher C, Schumacher J, Lipowsky A, et al. A functional trait-based approach to understand community assembly and diversity-productivity relationships over 7 years in experimental grasslands. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst, 2013, 15: 139-149. Google Scholar

[100] Roscher C, Schumacher J, Gubsch M, et al. Using plant functional traits to explain diversity-productivity relationships. PLoS One, 2012, 7: e36760. Google Scholar

[101] Reich P B, Tilman D, Naeem S, et al. Species and functional group diversity independently influence biomass accumulation and its response to CO2 and N. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 10101-10106. Google Scholar

[102] 卜文圣, 马克平. 基于功能性状探讨生物多样性与生态系统功能关系. 见: 马克平, 主编. 中国生物多样性保护与研究进展X. 北京: 气象出版社, 2014. 175-182. Google Scholar

[103] Mouillot D, Villeger S, Scherer-Lorenzen M, et al. Functional structure of biological communities predicts ecosystem multifunctionality. PLoS One, 2011, 6: e17476. Google Scholar

[104] Grigulis K, Lavorel S, Krainer U, et al. Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services. J Ecol, 2013, 101: 47-57. Google Scholar

[105] Ruiz-Jaen M C, Potvin C. Can we predict carbon stocks in tropical ecosystems from tree diversity? Comparing species and functional diversity in a plantation and a natural forest. New Phytol, 2011, 189: 978-987. Google Scholar

[106] de Bello F, Lavorel S, Diaz S, et al. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers Conserv, 2010, 19: 2873-2893. Google Scholar

[107] Mouillot D, Graham N A J, Villeger S, et al. A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends Ecol Evol, 2013, 28: 167-177. Google Scholar

[108] Diaz S, Noy-Meir I, Cabido M. Can grazing response of herbaceous plants be predicted from simple vegetative traits? J Appl Ecol, 2001, 38: 497-508. Google Scholar

[109] Noy-Meir I, Kaplan D. Species richness of annual legumes in relation to grazing in Mediterranean vegetation in northern Israel. Israel J Plant Sci, 2002, 50: S95-S109. Google Scholar

[110] Briggs J M, Knapp A K, Brock B L. Expansion of woody plants in tallgrass prairie: a fifteen-year study of fire and fire-grazing interactions. Am Midl Nat, 2002, 147: 287-294. Google Scholar

[111] Heisler J L, Briggs J M, Knapp A K. Long-term patterns of shrub expansion in a C4-dominated grassland: fire frequency and the dynamics of shrub cover and abundance. Am J Bot, 2003, 90: 423-428. Google Scholar

[112] Spasojevic M J, Aicher R J, Koch G R, et al. Fire and grazing in a mesic tallgrass prairie: impacts on plant species and functional traits. Ecology, 2010, 91: 1651-1659. Google Scholar

[113] Pausas J G, Bradstock R A, Keith D A, et al. Plant functional traits in relation to fire in crown-fire ecosystems. Ecology, 2004, 85: 1085-1100. Google Scholar

[114] Louault F, Pillar V D, Aufrere J, et al. Plant traits and functional types in response to reduced disturbance in a semi-natural grassland. J Veg Sci, 2005, 16: 151-160. Google Scholar

[115] Diaz S, Lavorel S, McIntyre S, et al. Plant trait responses to grazing—a global synthesis. Global Change Biol, 2007, 13: 313-341. Google Scholar

[116] Bruno J F, Stachowicz J J, Bertness M D. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol, 2003, 18: 119-125. Google Scholar

[117] Mack R N, Simberloff D, Lonsdale W M, et al. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl, 2000, 10: 689-710. Google Scholar

[118] Davis M A, Grime J P, Thompson K. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol, 2000, 88: 528-534. Google Scholar

[119] Levine J M, D’Antonio C M. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos, 1999, 87: 15-26. Google Scholar

[120] Kolar C S, Lodge D M. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol, 2001, 16: 199-204. Google Scholar

[121] Grotkopp E, Rejmanek M, Rost T L. Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am Nat, 2002, 159: 396-419. Google Scholar

[122] van Kleunen M, Richardson D M. Invasion biology and conservation biology: time to join forces to explore the links between species traits and extinction risk and invasiveness. Prog Phys Geog, 2007, 31: 447-450. Google Scholar

[123] Daehler C C. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2003, 34: 183-211. Google Scholar

[124] Chrobock T, Kempel A, Fischer M, et al. Introduction bias: cultivated alien plant species germinate faster and more abundantly than native species in Switzerland. Basic Appl Ecol, 2011, 12: 244-250. Google Scholar

[125] Lamarque L J, Delzon S, Lortie C J. Tree invasions: a comparative test of the dominant hypotheses and functional traits. Biol Invasions, 2011, 13: 1969-1989. Google Scholar

[126] van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett, 2010, 13: 235-245. Google Scholar

[127] Knapp S, Kuehn I. Origin matters: widely distributed native and non-native species benefit from different functional traits. Ecol Lett, 2012, 15: 696-703. Google Scholar

[128] Bernhardt-Roemermann M, Gray A, Vanbergen A J, et al. Functional traits and local environment predict vegetation responses to disturbance: a pan-European multi-site experiment. J Ecol, 2011, 99: 777-787. Google Scholar

[129] 闵鹏, 齐代华, 贺丽, 等. 四川山矾幼树叶功能性状在毛竹干扰下的响应. 林业科学, 2013, 49: 70-77. Google Scholar

[130] 马克平. 生物多样性与生态系统功能的实验研究. 生物多样性, 2013, 21: 247-248. Google Scholar

qqqq

Contact and support