SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 63 , Issue 11 : 210204(2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3045-5

Self-adaptive combination method for temporal evidence based on negotiation strategy

More info
  • ReceivedMay 21, 2020
  • AcceptedJul 31, 2020
  • PublishedOct 20, 2020



This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61703426, 61876189, 61806219), China Post-Doctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018M633680), Young Talent Fund of University Association for Science and Technology in Shaanxi, China (Grant No. 20190108), and Innovation Talent Supporting Project of Shaanxi, China (Grant No. 2020KJXX-065).


[1] Song Y, Fu Q, Wang Y F. Divergence-based cross entropy and uncertainty measures of Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets with their application in decision making. Appl Soft Computing, 2019, 84: 105703 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] Zhang B, Zhang M, Song Y. Combining Evidence Sources in Time Domain With Decision Maker's Preference on Time Sequence. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 174210 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Song Y, Wang X, Quan W. A new approach to construct similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Soft Comput, 2019, 23: 1985-1998 CrossRef Google Scholar

[4] Song Y, Wang X, Zhu J. Sensor dynamic reliability evaluation based on evidence theory and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Appl Intell, 2018, 48: 3950-3962 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Song Y, Wang X, Lei L. A novel similarity measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets with its applications. Appl Intell, 2015, 42: 252-261 CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Lei L, Song Y, Luo X. A new re-encoding ECOC using reject option. Appl Intell, 2020, 50: 3090-3100 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Dempster A P. Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping. Ann Math Statist, 1967, 38: 325-339 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976. Google Scholar

[9] Fei L, Lu J, Feng Y. An extended best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method by belief functions and its applications in hospital service evaluation. Comput Industrial Eng, 2020, 142: 106355 CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Liu Z G, Pan Q, Dezert J. Combination of Classifiers With Optimal Weight Based on Evidential Reasoning. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 2018, 26: 1217-1230 CrossRef Google Scholar

[11] Fei L, Feng Y, Liu L. Evidence combination using OWA?based soft likelihood functions. Int J Intell Syst, 2019, 34: 2269-2290 CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Liu Z, Pan Q, Dezert J. Classifier Fusion With Contextual Reliability Evaluation. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2018, 48: 1605-1618 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Fei L, Feng Y. A novel retrieval strategy for case-based reasoning based on attitudinal Choquet integral. Eng Appl Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 94: 103791 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Liu Z G, Pan Q, Dezert J. Hybrid Classification System for Uncertain Data. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst, 2017, 47: 2783-2790 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Fei L, Feng Y, Liu L. On Pythagorean fuzzy decision making using soft likelihood functions. Int J Intell Syst, 2019, 34: 3317-3335 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Liu Z G, Liu Y, Dezert J. Evidence Combination Based on Credal Belief Redistribution for Pattern Classification. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 2020, 28: 618-631 CrossRef Google Scholar

[17] Fei L, Feng Y. An Attitudinal Nonlinear Integral and Applications in Decision Making. Int J Fuzzy Syst, 2020, 24 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Liu Z, Zhang X, Niu J. Combination of Classifiers With Different Frames of Discernment Based on Belief Functions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 2020, : 1-1 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Wu D, Tang Y. An improved failure mode and effects analysis method based on uncertainty measure in the evidence theory. Qual Reliab Engng Int, 2020, 36: 1786-1807 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Hong L, Lynch A. Recursive temporal-spatial information fusion with applications to target identification. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 1993, 29: 435-445 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[21] Song Y F, Wang X D, Lei L. Combination of temporal evidence sources based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets (in Chinese). Acta Autom Sin, 2016, 42: 1322--1338. Google Scholar

[22] Chen Y F, Xa X Z, Hu D G, et al. Evidence combination based on tentative discount of evidences (in Chinese). Acta Electron Sin, 2014, 42: 756--765. Google Scholar

[23] Luo H, Yin Y P, Hu X X, et al. Method to modify evidence source based on trustworthy factors (in Chinese). Syst Eng Electron, 2015, 37: 1459--1464. Google Scholar

[24] Wen C L, Wang Y C, Xu X B. Fuzzy information fusion algorithm of fault diagnosis based on similarity measure of evidence. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Neural Networks. Berlin: Springer, 2008. 5264: 506--515. Google Scholar

[25] Yu C, Yang J, Yang D. An improved conflicting evidence combination approach based on a new supporting probability distance. Expert Syst Appl, 2015, 42: 5139-5149 CrossRef Google Scholar

[26] Bi W H, Zhang A, Li C. Weighted evidence combination method based on new evidence conflict measurement approach (in Chinese). Control Dec, 2016, 31: 73--78. Google Scholar

[27] Hu C H, Si X S, Zhou Z J et al. An improved D-S algorithm under the new measure criteria of evidence conflict (in Chinese). Acta Electron Sin, 2009, 37: 1578--1583. Google Scholar

[28] Liu Y X, Zhu Y P, Li X, et al. Integrated target discrimination model in missile defense system (in Chinese). J Electron Inform Technol, 2006, 28: 638--642. Google Scholar

[29] Wu J, Cheng Y M, Pan Q, et al. An effective multi-platform multi-radar target identification algorithm based on three level fusion hierarchical structure (in Chinese). J Northwestern Polytech Univ, 2012, 30: 367--372. Google Scholar

[30] Xu X B, Zhang Z, Li S B, et al. Fault diagnosis based on fusion and updating of diagnosis evidence (in Chinese). Acta Autom Sin, 2016, 42: 107--121. Google Scholar

[31] Liu W. Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions. Artificial Intelligence, 2006, 170: 909-924 CrossRef Google Scholar

[32] Jousselme A L, Maupin P. Distances in evidence theory: Comprehensive survey and generalizations. Int J Approximate Reasoning, 2012, 53: 118-145 CrossRef Google Scholar

[33] Jousselme A L, Grenier D, Bossé . A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Inf Fusion, 2001, 2: 91-101 CrossRef Google Scholar

[34] Tessem B. Approximations for efficient computation in the theory of evidence. Artificial Intelligence, 1993, 61: 315-329 CrossRef Google Scholar

[35] Zhu J, Wang X, Song Y. A new distance between BPAs based on the power-set-distribution pignistic probability function. Appl Intell, 2018, 48: 1506-1518 CrossRef Google Scholar