logo

SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 64 , Issue 4 : 140301(2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3030-2

A survey of prototype and experiment for UAV communications

More info
  • ReceivedMay 6, 2020
  • AcceptedAug 6, 2020
  • PublishedFeb 26, 2021

Abstract


Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by National Science Foundation of China for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No. 61625106), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61921004, 61871137), Program for Innovative Talents and Entrepreneur in Jiangsu (Grant No. 1104000402), Research Fund by Nanjing Government (Grant No. 1104000396), Open Research Fund of Double First-Class Initiative Applied Characteristic Discipline of Control Science and Engineering, Huaihua University (Grant No. ZNKPY2019-1), and Open Research Fund of National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University (Grant No. 2019D08).


References

[1] Zeng Y, Zhang R, Lim T J. Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Commun Mag, 2016, 54: 36-42 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] Zeng Y, Wu Q, Zhang R. Accessing From the Sky: A Tutorial on UAV Communications for 5G and Beyond. Proc IEEE, 2019, 107: 2327-2375 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Johnson W. Helicopter Theory. Courier Corporation, 2012. Google Scholar

[4] Filippone A. Flight Performance of Fixed and Rotary Wing Aircraft. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009. Google Scholar

[5] Walid S, Bennis M, Mozaffari M, et al. Wireless Communications and Networking for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. Google Scholar

[6] Mozaffari M, Saad W, Bennis M. A Tutorial on UAVs for Wireless Networks: Applications, Challenges, and Open Problems. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2019, 21: 2334-2360 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Hayat S, Yanmaz E, Muzaffar R. Survey on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Networks for Civil Applications: A Communications Viewpoint. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2016, 18: 2624-2661 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Shakhatreh H, Sawalmeh A H, Al-Fuqaha A. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Survey on Civil Applications and Key Research Challenges. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 48572-48634 CrossRef Google Scholar

[9] Gupta L, Jain R, Vaszkun G. Survey of Important Issues in UAV Communication Networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2016, 18: 1123-1152 CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Cao X, Yang P, Alzenad M. Airborne Communication Networks: A Survey. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2018, 36: 1907-1926 CrossRef Google Scholar

[11] Jiang J, Han G. Routing Protocols for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Commun Mag, 2018, 56: 58-63 CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Bekmezci , Sahingoz O K, Temel . Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs): A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 2013, 11: 1254-1270 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Hossein Motlagh N, Taleb T, Arouk O. Low-Altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicles-Based Internet of Things Services: Comprehensive Survey and Future Perspectives. IEEE Internet Things J, 2016, 3: 899-922 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Mozaffari M, Saad W, Bennis M. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle With Underlaid Device-to-Device Communications: Performance and Tradeoffs. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2016, 15: 3949-3963 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Zhang S, Zhang H, Di B. Cellular UAV-to-X Communications: Design and Optimization for Multi-UAV Networks. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2019, 18: 1346-1359 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Cheng N, Xu W, Shi W. Air-Ground Integrated Mobile Edge Networks: Architecture, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Commun Mag, 2018, 56: 26-32 CrossRef Google Scholar

[17] Chen M, Mozaffari M, Saad W. Caching in the Sky: Proactive Deployment of Cache-Enabled Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Optimized Quality-of-Experience. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2017, 35: 1046-1061 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Lu M, Bagheri M, James A P. Wireless Charging Techniques for UAVs: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 29865-29884 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Van Der Bergh B, Chiumento A, Pollin S. LTE in the sky: trading off propagation benefits with interference costs for aerial nodes. IEEE Commun Mag, 2016, 54: 44-50 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Zeng Y, Lyu J, Zhang R. Cellular-Connected UAV: Potential, Challenges, and Promising Technologies. IEEE Wireless Commun, 2019, 26: 120-127 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Lin X, Yajnanarayana V, Muruganathan S D. The Sky Is Not the Limit: LTE for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Commun Mag, 2018, 56: 204-210 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Fotouhi A, Qiang H, Ding M. Survey on UAV Cellular Communications: Practical Aspects, Standardization Advancements, Regulation, and Security Challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2019, 21: 3417-3442 CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Dochev I N, Docheva L E, Manev S. Embedding of Communication and Measurement Equipment in Drones. In: Proceedings of 2018 IX National Conference with International Participation (ELECTRONICA), Sofia, 2018. 1--4. Google Scholar

[24] Wilkins G, Fourie D, Meyer J. Critical design parameters for a low altitude long endurance solar powered UAV. In: Proceedings of AFRICON 2009, Nairobi, 2009. 1--6. Google Scholar

[25] Lu M, Bagheri M, James A P. Wireless Charging Techniques for UAVs: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 29865-29884 CrossRef Google Scholar

[26] Ouyang J, Che Y, Xu J, et al. Throughput maximization for laser-powered UAV wireless communication systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Kansas City, 2018. 1--6. Google Scholar

[27] Zhao M M, Shi Q, Zhao M J. Efficiency Maximization for UAV-Enabled Mobile Relaying Systems With Laser Charging. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2020, 19: 3257-3272 CrossRef Google Scholar

[28] Lim H, Park J, Lee D. Build Your Own Quadrotor: Open-Source Projects on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Robot Automat Mag, 2012, 19: 33-45 CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Nunns G J, Chen Y, Chang D, et al. Autonomous Flying WiFi Access Point. In: Proceedings of 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), Barcelona, 2019. 278--283. Google Scholar

[30] Vilhar A, Hrovat A, Javornik T, et al. Experimental analysis of wireless temporary networks deployed by low altitude platforms. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE 18th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD), Berlin, 2013. 238--242. Google Scholar

[31] Gu Y, Zhou M, Fu S, et al. Airborne WiFi networks through directional antennae: an experimental study. In: Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), New Orleans, 2015. 1314--1319. Google Scholar

[32] Godoy J A, Cabrera F, Araza V, et al. A new approach of V2X communications for long range applications in UAVs. In: Proceedings of 2018 2nd URSI Atlantic Radio Science Meeting (AT-RASC), Meloneras, 2018. 1--4. Google Scholar

[33] Dambal V A, Mohadikar S, Kumbhar A, et al. Improving LoRa signal coverage in urban and sub-urban environments with UAVs. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Antenna Technology (iWAT), Miami, 2019. 210--213. Google Scholar

[34] Muruganathan S, Lin X, Maattanen H, et al. An overview of 3GPP release-15 study on enhanced LTE support for connected drones. 2018,. arXiv Google Scholar

[35] Powell K, Sabri A, Brennan D, et al. Software Radios for Unmanned Aerial Systems. 2020,. arXiv Google Scholar

[36] Marojevic V, Guvenc I, Sichitiu M L, et al. An experimental research platform architecture for UAS communications and networking. In: Proceedings of 2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Fall), Honolulu, 2019. 1--5. Google Scholar

[37] Ye X, Cai X, Yin X, et al. Air-to-ground big-data-assisted channel modeling based on passive sounding in LTE networks. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GC Wkshps), Singapore, 2017. 1--6. Google Scholar

[38] Gutierrez R M, Yu H, Rong Y, et al. Time and frequency dispersion characteristics of the UAS wireless channel in residential and mountainous desert terrains. in Proc. IEEE Annual Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, 2017. 516--521. Google Scholar

[39] Khawaja W, Ozdemir O, Guvenc I. UAV Air-to-Ground Channel Characterization for mmWave Systems. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), Toronto, 2017. 1--5. Google Scholar

[40] Izydorczyk T, Bucur M, Tavares F M L, et al. Experimental evaluation of multi-antenna receivers for UAV communication in live LTE networks. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GC Wkshps), Abu Dhabi, 2018. 1--6. Google Scholar

[41] Careem M A A, Gomez J, Saha D, et al. HiPER-V: a high precision radio frequency vehicle for aerial measurements. In: Proceedings of 2019 16th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication and Networking (SECON), Boston, 2019. 1--6. Google Scholar

[42] Koubaa A, Allouch A, Alajlan M. Micro Air Vehicle Link (MAVlink) in a Nutshell: A Survey. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 87658-87680 CrossRef Google Scholar

[43] Shi Y, Wensowitch J, Ward A, et al. Building UAV-based testbeds for autonomous mobility and beamforming experimentation. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication and Networking (SECON Workshops), Hong Kong, 2018. 1--5. Google Scholar

[44] Matolak D W. Air-Ground Channels Models: Comprehensive Review and Considerations for Unmanned Aircraft Systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2012. 1--17. Google Scholar

[45] Khawaja W, Guvenc I, Matolak D W. A Survey of Air-to-Ground Propagation Channel Modeling for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2019, 21: 2361-2391 CrossRef Google Scholar

[46] Matolak D W, Ruoyu Sun D W. Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Air-Ground Channel Characterization for Future Applications. IEEE Veh Technol Mag, 2015, 10: 79-85 CrossRef Google Scholar

[47] Khuwaja A A, Chen Y, Zhao N. A Survey of Channel Modeling for UAV Communications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2018, 20: 2804-2821 CrossRef Google Scholar

[48] Al-Hourani A, Kandeepan S, Jamalipour A. Modeling air-to-ground path loss for low altitude platforms in urban environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Austin, 2014. 2898--2904. Google Scholar

[49] Al-Hourani A, Kandeepan S, Lardner S. Optimal LAP Altitude for Maximum Coverage. IEEE Wireless Commun Lett, 2014, 3: 569-572 CrossRef Google Scholar

[50] Feng Q, McGeehan J, Tameh E K, et al. Path loss models for air-to-ground radio channels in urban environments. In: Proceedings of 2006 IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), Melbourne, 2006. 2901--2905. Google Scholar

[51] Alzenad M, El-Keyi A, Lagum F, et al. 3-D Placement of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Base Station (UAV-BS) for Energy-Efficient Maximal Coverage. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. 2017, 6: 434--437 DOI 10.1109/LWC.2017.2700840. Google Scholar

[52] Matolak D W, Sun R. Air-Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems-Part I: Methods, Measurements, and Models for Over-Water Settings. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2017, 66: 26-44 CrossRef Google Scholar

[53] Matolak D W, Sun R. Air-Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems-Part III: The Suburban and Near-Urban Environments. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2017, 66: 6607-6618 CrossRef Google Scholar

[54] Matolak D W, Sun R. Air-Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems-Part III: The Suburban and Near-Urban Environments. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2017, 66: 6607-6618 CrossRef Google Scholar

[55] Newhall W G, Mostafa R, Dietrich C, et al. Wideband air-to-ground radio channel measurements using an antenna array at 2 GHz for low-altitude operations. In: Proceedings of IEEE Military Communications Conference, Boston, 2003. 1422--1427. Google Scholar

[56] Khawaja W, Guvenc I, Matolak D. UWB channel sounding and modeling for UAV air-to-ground propagation channels. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Washington, 2016. 1--7. Google Scholar

[57] Willink T J, Squires C C, Colman G W K. Measurement and Characterization of Low-Altitude Air-to-Ground MIMO Channels. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2016, 65: 2637-2648 CrossRef Google Scholar

[58] Wang N, Yin X, Cai X, et al. A novel air-to-ground channel modeling method based on graph model. In: Proceedings of 2019 13th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Krakow, 2019. 1--5. Google Scholar

[59] Amorim R, Nguyen H, Wigard J, et al. LTE radio measurements above urban rooftops for aerial communications. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications & Networking Conference (WCNC), Barcelona, 2018, pp. 1-6. Google Scholar

[60] Liu T, Zhang Z, Jiang H. Measurement-Based Characterization and Modeling for Low-Altitude UAV Air-to-Air Channels. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 98832-98840 CrossRef Google Scholar

[61] Cai X, Rodriguez-Pineiro J, Yin X. An Empirical Air-to-Ground Channel Model Based on Passive Measurements in LTE. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2019, 68: 1140-1154 CrossRef Google Scholar

[62] Qiu Z, Chu X, Calvo-Ramirez C. Low Altitude UAV Air-to-Ground Channel Measurement and Modeling in Semiurban Environments. Wireless Commun Mobile Computing, 2017, 2017: 1-11 CrossRef Google Scholar

[63] Shi Y, Enami R, Wensowitch J, et al. Measurement-based characterization of LOS and NLOS drone-to-ground channels. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications & Networking Conference (WCNC), Barcelona, 2018. 1--6. Google Scholar

[64] Amorim R, Nguyen H, Mogensen P. Radio Channel Modeling for UAV Communication Over Cellular Networks. IEEE Wireless Commun Lett, 2017, 6: 514-517 CrossRef Google Scholar

[65] Al-Hourani A, Gomez K. Modeling Cellular-to-UAV Path-Loss for Suburban Environments. IEEE Wireless Commun Lett, 2018, 7: 82-85 CrossRef Google Scholar

[66] Calvo-Ramírez C, Gonzalez-Plaza A, Briso C, et al. Wide Band Propagation Measurements and Modelling for Low Altitude UAVs. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2018), London, 2018. 1--5. Google Scholar

[67] Amorim R, Mogensen P, Sorensen T, et al. Pathloss measurements and modeling for UAVs connected to cellular networks. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Sydney, 2017. 1--6. Google Scholar

[68] Di Franco C, Buttazzo G. Energy-aware coverage path planning of UAVs. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, 2015. 111--117. Google Scholar

[69] Richards A, How J P. Aircraft trajectory planning with collision avoidance using mixed integer linear programming. In: Proceedings of IEEE American Control Conference, 2002. 1936--1941. Google Scholar

[70] Ma C S, Miller R H. MILP optimal path planning for real-time applications. In: Proceedings of IEEE American Control Conference, 2006. 6. Google Scholar

[71] Gr?tli E I, Johansen T A. Path Planning for UAVs Under Communication Constraints Using SPLAT and MILP. J Intell Robot Syst, 2012, 65: 265-282 CrossRef Google Scholar

[72] Mei Y, Lu Y-H, Hu Y C, et al. Energy-efficient motion planning for mmobile robots. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. 4344--4349. Google Scholar

[73] Zeng Y, Zhang R. Energy-Efficient UAV Communication With Trajectory Optimization. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2017, 16: 3747-3760 CrossRef Google Scholar

[74] Zeng Y, Xu J, Zhang R. Energy Minimization for Wireless Communication With Rotary-Wing UAV. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2019, 18: 2329-2345 CrossRef Google Scholar

[75] Gao N, Zeng Y, Wang J, et al. Energy Model for UAV Communications: Experimental Validation and Model Generalization. 2020,. arXiv Google Scholar

[76] Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network: Study on enhanced LTE Support for Aerial Vehicles, document 3GPP TR 36.777 V15.0.0, 2017. Google Scholar

[77] Izydorczyk T, Ginard M M, Svendsen S, et al. Experimental evaluation of beamforming on UAVs in cellular systems. 2020,. arXiv Google Scholar

[78] Qualcomm. LTE Unmanned Aircraft Systems Trial Report. 2017. https://www.qualcomm.com/documents/lte-unmanned-aircraft-systems-trial-report. Google Scholar

[79] Batistatos M C, Athanasiadou G E, Zarbouti D A, et al. LTE ground-to-air measurements for UAV-assisted cellular networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2018), London, 2018. 1--5. Google Scholar

[80] Ivancic W D, Kerczewski R J, Murawski R W, et al. Flying drones beyond visual line of sight using 4G LTE: issues and concerns. In: Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Networking and Services (ICNS), Herndon, 2019. 1--13. Google Scholar

[81] Jwa J W, Won J H. Network Quality Measurements of LTE Drones. Inter Eng J Technol 2018, 7: 54--57. Google Scholar

[82] Kovacs I, Amorim R, Nguyen H C, et al. Interference analysis for UAV connectivity over LTE using aerial radio measurements. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), Toronto, 2017. 1--6. Google Scholar

[83] Yang G, Lin X, Li Y, et al. A telecom perspective on the Internet of drones: from LTE-advanced to 5G. 2017,. arXiv Google Scholar

[84] Sae J, Wiren R, Kauppi J, et al. Public LTE network measurements with drones in rural environment. in proc. 2019 IEEE 89th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Spring), Kuala Lumpur, 2019. 1--5. Google Scholar

[85] Nguyen H C, Amorim R, Wigard J. How to Ensure Reliable Connectivity for Aerial Vehicles Over Cellular Networks. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 12304-12317 CrossRef Google Scholar

[86] Li S, He C, Liu M. Design and implementation of aerial communication using directional antennas: learning control in unknown communication environments. IET Contr Theor Applicat, 2019, 2: 2906-2916 CrossRef Google Scholar

[87] Heimann K, Tiemann J, Boecker S, et al. On the potential of 5G mmWave pencil beam antennas for UAV communications: an experimental evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas, Bochum, 2018. 1--6. Google Scholar

[88] Chandrasekharan S, Gomez K, Al-Hourani A. Designing and implementing future aerial communication networks. IEEE Commun Mag, 2016, 54: 26-34 CrossRef Google Scholar

[89] Gangula R, Esrafilian O, Gesbert D, et al. Flying rebots: first results on an autonomous UAV-based LTE relay using open airinterface. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), Kalamata, 2018. 1--5. Google Scholar

[90] Ono F, Takizawa K, Tsuji H, et al. Measurement of TCP and UDP performance over UAS relay networks. In: Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Orlando, 2014. 389--394. Google Scholar

[91] Guo W, Devine C, Wang S. Performance analysis of micro unmanned airborne communication relays for cellular networks. In: Proceedings of 2014 9th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP), Manchester, 2014. 658--663. Google Scholar

[92] Moheddine A, Patrone F, Marchese M. UAV and IoT integration: a flying gateway. In: Proceedings of 2019 26th IEEE International Conferenceon Environmental and Computer Science (ICECS), Genoa, 2019. 121--122. Google Scholar

[93] Popescu D, Stoican F, Ichim L, et al. Collaborative UAV-WSN system for data acquisition and processing in agriculture. In: Proceedings of 2019 10th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS), Metz, 2019. 519--524. Google Scholar

[94] Liang X, Wang Y, Jaakkola A. Forest Data Collection Using Terrestrial Image-Based Point Clouds From a Handheld Camera Compared to Terrestrial and Personal Laser Scanning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2015, 53: 5117-5132 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[95] Cao H, He W, Lv X, et al. Design and experiment of a WSN sink platform based on fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicles. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), Xi'an, 2016. 1271--1274. Google Scholar

[96] Chen M, Saad W, Yin C. Liquid State Machine Learning for Resource and Cache Management in LTE-U Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Networks. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun, 2019, 18: 1504-1517 CrossRef Google Scholar

[97] Lu H, Zeng Y, Jin S, et al. Enabling panoramic full-angle reflection via aerial intelligent reflecting surface. 2020,. arXiv Google Scholar

[98] Chen M, Challita U, Saad W. Artificial Neural Networks-Based Machine Learning for Wireless Networks: A Tutorial. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2019, 21: 3039-3071 CrossRef Google Scholar

[99] rezWideband Calvo-Ramírez C, Gonzalez-Plaza A, Briso C, et al. Wide Band Propagation Measurements and Modelling for Low Altitude UAVs. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2018), London, 2018. 1--5. Google Scholar

qqqq

Contact and support