SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 63 , Issue 1 : 112204(2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-9896-2

Dual-mode predictive control of a rotor suspension system

More info
  • ReceivedFeb 21, 2019
  • AcceptedApr 29, 2019
  • PublishedDec 25, 2019



[1] Knospe C R. Active magnetic bearings for machining applications. Control Eng Practice, 2007, 15: 307-313 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] Lim T M, Zhang D, Yang J. Design and parameter estimation of hybrid magnetic bearings for blood pump applications. Mech Syst Signal Processing, 2009, 23: 2352-2382 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[3] Fittro R L, Knospe C R. $\mu$ control of a high speed spindle thrust magnetic bearing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 1999. 570--575. Google Scholar

[4] Zhang L, Liu K. Riccati difference equation in optimal control for magnetic bearings. Sci China Technol Sci, 2012, 55: 2107-2114 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Schweitzer G, Maslen E H. Magnetic Bearings: Theory, Design, and Application to Rotating Machinery. Berlin: Springer, 2009. Google Scholar

[6] Maslen E H, Sawicki J T. $\mu$-synthesis for magnetic bearings: why use such a complicated tool? In: Proceedings of ASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2007. 1103--1112. Google Scholar

[7] Sivrioglu S. Adaptive control of nonlinear zero-bias current magnetic bearing system. NOnlinear Dyn, 2007, 48: 175-184 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Kang M S, Lyou J, Lee J K. Sliding mode control for an active magnetic bearing system subject to base motion. Mechatronics, 2010, 20: 171-178 CrossRef Google Scholar

[9] Kuseyri S. Robust control and unbalance compensation of rotor/active magnetic bearing systems. J Vib Control, 2012, 18: 817-832 CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Dong L, You S. Adaptive control of an active magnetic bearing with external disturbance.. ISA Trans, 2014, 53: 1410-1419 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[11] Pesch A H, Smirnov A, Pyrhonen O. Magnetic Bearing Spindle Tool Tracking Through ${\mu}$ -Synthesis Robust Control. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2015, 20: 1448-1457 CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Kandil M S, Dubois M R, Bakay L S. Application of Second-Order Sliding-Mode Concepts to Active Magnetic Bearings. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2018, 65: 855-864 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Xie J, Zeng X, Zhang M. Implementation of active magnetic control system for piston centering in labyrinth piston compressor. Mechatronics, 2018, 54: 52-67 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Chen M, Wu Q X, Jiang C S. Guaranteed transient performance based control with input saturation for near space vehicles. Sci China Inf Sci, 2014, 57: 1-12 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Chen M, Ren B B, Wu Q X. Anti-disturbance control of hypersonic flight vehicles with input saturation using disturbance observer. Sci China Inf Sci, 2015, 58: 1-12 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Albin T. Benefits of model predictive control for gasoline airpath control. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 70204 CrossRef Google Scholar

[17] Harinath E, Foguth L C, Braatz R D. A robust dual-mode MPC approach to ensuring critical quality attributes in quality-by-design. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference (ACC), 2016. 2041--2046. Google Scholar

[18] Yuan Y, Zhang H T, Wu Y. Bayesian Learning-Based Model-Predictive Vibration Control for Thin-Walled Workpiece Machining Processes. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2017, 22: 509-520 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Cai Z, Ul Haq A A, Cholette M E. Energy Efficiency and Tracking Performance Evaluation for Dual-Mode Model Predictive Control of HVAC Systems. J Thermal Sci Eng Appl, 2018, 10: 041023 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Maciejowski J M. Predictive Control: with Constraints. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 2002. Google Scholar

[21] Ruan X G, Hou X Y, Ma H Y. Stability analysis of constrained MPC with CLF applied to discrete-time nonlinear system. Sci China Inf Sci, 2014, 57: 1-9 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Zhang Y, Cao W, Jin Y. An ensemble model based on weighted support vector regression and its application in annealing heating process. Sci China Inf Sci, 2019, 62: 049202 CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Mayne D Q, Rawlings J B, Rao C V. Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality. Automatica, 2000, 36: 789-814 CrossRef Google Scholar

[24] Guo L, Gao B, Li Y. A fast algorithm for nonlinear model predictive control applied to HEV energy management systems. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 092201 CrossRef Google Scholar

[25] Zhang H, Wang T, Zhao Y. FIR system identification with set-valued and precise observations from multiple sensors. Sci China Inf Sci, 2019, 62: 052203 CrossRef Google Scholar

[26] Zhang H T, Wu Y, He D. Model predictive control to mitigate chatters in milling processes with input constraints. Int J Machine Tools Manufacture, 2015, 91: 54-61 CrossRef Google Scholar

[27] Kouvaritakis B, Rossiter J A, Schuurmans J. Efficient robust predictive control. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2000, 45: 1545-1549 CrossRef Google Scholar

[28] Zhang H T, Li H X, Chen G. Dual-mode predictive control algorithm for constrained Hammerstein systems. Int J Control, 2008, 81: 1609-1625 CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Khalil H K. Nonlinear Systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 2012. Google Scholar

[30] Zhang H T, Chen G, Chen M Z Q. A novel dual-mode predictive control strategy for constrained Wiener systems. Int J Robust NOnlinear Control, 2009, 32 CrossRef Google Scholar

[31] Zhang F Z. The Schur Complement and Its Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2006. Google Scholar

[32] Lofberg J. YALMIP: a toolbox for modeling and optimization in matlab. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. 3753--3757. Google Scholar

[33] Blondel V D, Boyd S P, Kimura H. Recent Advances in Learning and Control. Berlin: Springer, 2008. Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    (Color online) (a) Spindle with AMBs. (b) Structure of the spindle with installed AMBs. ${b}_1$: front bearing; protect łinebreak ${b}_2$: back bearing; ${b}_3$: front position sensors; ${b}_4$: back position sensors; $c$: axial bearing; $d$: motor. (c) Magnified image of the rotor.

  • Figure 2

    (Color online) Architecture of the control system of the rotor-AMB platform displayed in Figure 1. $a_1$: monitor; $a_2$: controller; $a_3$ and ${a}_4$: power amplifiers; ${a}_5$: displacement amplifiers and filters.

  • Table 1   Parameters for two axial AMBs in the spindle
    Data Value Units
    AMB mass $M_{f,b}$ diag(8,8), diag(6,6) kg
    Coil turns $N_{f,b}$ 180, 180
    Pole area $\zeta_{f,b}$ 850, 612 $\text{mm}^2$
    Nominal gap length $q_0$ 0.50 mm
    Backup bearing gap $R_0$ 0.25 mm
    Bias current $I_0$ 0.5 A