There is no abstract available for this article.
This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB1309300), National Youth Talent Support Program of China, a Part of “Ten Thousand Plan" — National High Level Talents Special Support Plan.
[1] Garcia E, Casbeer D W, Pachter M. Design and Analysis of State-Feedback Optimal Strategies for the Differential Game of Active Defense. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2019, 64: 553-568 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2] Liang L, Peng Z H, Zhang F, et al. Two coupled pursuit-evasion games in target-attacker-defender problem. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference Decision and Control, 2017. 5596--5601. Google Scholar
[3] Zhang F, Zha W. Evasion strategies of a three-player lifeline game. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 112206 CrossRef Google Scholar
[4] Chen M, Zhou Z Y, Tomlin C J. A path defense approach to the multiplayer reach-avoid game. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference Decision and Control, 2014. 2420--2426. Google Scholar
[5] Liu S, Zhou Z Y, Tomlin C J, et al. Evasion of a team of Dubins vehicles from a hidden pursuer. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014. 6771--6776. Google Scholar
[6] Casbeer D W, Garcia E, Pachter E. The Target Differential Game with Two Defenders. J Intell Robot Syst, 2018, 89: 87--106. Google Scholar
[7] Yan R, Shi Z, Zhong Y. Reach-Avoid Games With Two Defenders and One Attacker: An Analytical Approach.. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2019, 49: 1035-1046 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
[8] Liang L, Deng F, Peng Z. A differential game for cooperative target defense. Automatica, 2019, 102: 58-71 CrossRef Google Scholar
Figure 1
(Color online) (a) TAD game with two slow defenders; (b) TAD game in the relative space; (c) the winning region of the attacker with different $d$, where $\alpha=0.6,\beta=0.7$; (d) the winning region of the attacker with two defenders in different positions. $D_1$ lies in $(0,3)$ and $D_2$ lies in $(2,2)$.
Download PDF
