SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 63 , Issue 10 : 202307(2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-2870-8

Theoretical and numerical analyses for PDM-IM signals using Stokes vectorreceivers

More info
  • ReceivedOct 8, 2019
  • AcceptedApr 13, 2020
  • PublishedSep 17, 2020



This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFB1803905), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61671053, 61871030), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. FRF-TP-19-017A1), State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems Networks, China, the Open Fund of IPOC (BUPT) (Grant No. IPOC2018B009), Foundation of Beijing Engineering and Technology Center for Convergence Networks and Ubiquitous Services, and Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Grant Nos. 1-ZVGB, G-SB65, 4-BCCK).


[1] Zhong K, Zhou X, Huo J. Digital Signal Processing for Short-Reach Optical Communications: A Review of Current Technologies and Future Trends. J Lightwave Technol, 2018, 36: 377-400 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[2] El-Fiky E, Samani A, Patel D. 400 Gb/s O-band silicon photonic transmitter for intra-datacenter optical interconnects. Opt Express, 2019, 27: 10258-10268 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[3] Li Z, Shubin I, Zhou X. Optical interconnects: recent advances and future challenges. Opt Express, 2015, 23: 3717-3720 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[4] Zhou, Xiang, Ryohei Urata, and Hong Liu. Beyond 1Tb/s datacenter interconnect technology: challenges and solutions. In: Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2019. Google Scholar

[5] Jingchi Cheng, Chongjin Xie, Yizhao Chen, et al. Comparison of Coherent and IMDD Transceivers for Intra Datacenter Optical Interconnects. In: Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2019. Google Scholar

[6] Che D, Li A, Chen X. Rejuvenating direct modulation and direct detection for modern optical communications. Optics Commun, 2018, 409: 86-93 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[7] Eslam El-Fiky, Alireza Samani, Md Samiul Alam, et al. A 4-lane 400 Gb/s silicon photonic transceiver for intra-datacenter optical interconnects. In: Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2019. Google Scholar

[8] Huo J, Zhou X, Zhong K P. Transmitter and receiver DSP for 112 Gbit/s PAM-4 amplifier-less transmissions using 25G-class EML and APD. Opt Express, 2018, 26: 22673-22686 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[9] Zhang Jiao, Yu Jianjun, Zhao Li, et al. Demonstration of 260-Gb/s Single-Lane EML-Based PS-PAM-8 IM/DD for Datacenter Interconnects. In: Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2019. W4l.4. Google Scholar

[10] Zhou J, Qiao Y, Huang X. Joint FDE and MLSD Algorithm for 56-Gbit/s Optical FTN-PAM4 System Using 10G-Class Optics. J Lightwave Technol, 2019, 37: 3343-3350 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[11] Che Di, Shieh William. Achievable Rate Comparison between Entropy and Bit Loading in a 100-Gb/s DM-DD DMT System. In: Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2019. W1F.3. Google Scholar

[12] Tanaka Toshiki, Nishihara Masato, Takahara Tomoo, et al. Experimental demonstration of 448-Gbps+ DMT transmission over 30-km SMF. In: Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2014. M2I-5. Google Scholar

[13] Olmedo M I, Zuo T, Jensen J B. Multiband Carrierless Amplitude Phase Modulation for High Capacity Optical Data Links. J Lightwave Technol, 2014, 32: 798-804 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[14] Tao Li, Ji Yu, Liu Jie, et al. Advanced modulation formats for short reach optical communication systems. IEEE network, 2013,27(6) 6-13. Google Scholar

[15] Morsy-Osman M, Chagnon M, Poulin M. 224-Gb/s 10-km Transmission of PDM PAM-4 at 1.3 μm Using a Single Intensity-Modulated Laser and a Direct-Detection MIMO DSP-Based Receiver. J Lightwave Technol, 2015, 33: 1417-1424 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[16] Kazuro Kikuchi. Electronic polarization-division demultiplexing based on digital signal processing in intensity-modulation direct-detection optical communication systems. Optics Express, 2014, 22(2):1971-1980. Google Scholar

[17] Shieh William, Khodakarami Hamid, and Che Di. Polarization diversity and modulation for highspeed optical communications. APL Photonics, 2016, 1: 040801. Google Scholar

[18] Morsy-Osman M, Chagnon M, Plant D V. Four-Dimensional Modulation and Stokes Direct Detection of Polarization Division Multiplexed Intensities, Inter Polarization Phase and Inter Polarization Differential Phase. J Lightwave Technol, 2016, 34: 1585-1592 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Che Di, Yuan Feng, Shieh William, 200-Gb/s polarization-multiplexed DMT using stokes vector receiver with frequency-domain MIMO. In: Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2016. Tu3D.4. Google Scholar

[20] Pan Y, Yan L, Yi A. Simplified demultiplexing scheme for two PDM-IM/DD systems utilizing a single Stokes analyzer over 25-km SMF. Opt Lett, 2017, 42: 4071-4074 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[21] Chagnon Mathieu, Morsy-Osman Mohamed, V. Plant David, Half-Terabit Single-Carrier Direct-Detect Transceiver, Formats, and DSP: Analysis and Demonstration. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2017, 36(2): 447-459. Google Scholar

[22] van den Borne D. Robust optical transmission systems: modulation and equalization. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology, 2008. Google Scholar

[23] Chen C-L. Elements of Optoelectronics and Fiber Optics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996. Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    (Color online) Structures of the SVRs. (a) Receiver A: $90^\circ~$ optical hybrid with 2 BPDs and 2 PDs. (b) Receiver B: $90^\circ~$ optical hybrid with 4 PDs. (c) Receiver C: Stokes analyzer. (d) Receiver D: 3 $\times$ 3 coupler with 4 PDs.

  • Figure 2

    (Color online) Normalized noise power vs. the SOP rotation angle of PDM-IM signals in different SVRs. protectłinebreak (a) Receiver A, (b) receiver B, (c) receiver C and (d) receiver D.

  • Figure 3

    (Color online) Simulation setup for the 224 Gbit/s PDM-PAM4-DD system. PBS: polarization beam splitter. IM: intensity modulator. PBC: polarization beam combiner. SSMF: standard single-mode fiber. VOA: variable optical attenuator.

  • Figure 4

    (Color online) BER performance as a function of the SOP angles for 224 Gbit/s PDM-PAM4 signal detection using different SVRs. (a) Receiver A, (b) receiver B, (c) receiver C, and (d) receiver D.

  • Figure 5

    (Color online) Simulation results of the BER vs. ROP at the best and worst SOP angles for 224 Gbit/s PDM-PAM4 signals. (a) Receiver A, (b) receiver B, (c) receiver C, and (d) receiver D.

  • Figure 6

    (Color online) Simulation results of 224 Gbit/s PDM-PAM4 signals after C band 2 km transmission for different SVRs.

  • Table 1  

    Table 1General simulation parameters of 224 Gbit/s PDM-PAM4-DD systems

    Parameter Value Parameter Value
    Wavelength 1310 nm Laser Linewidth 10 MHz
    DAC/ADC resolution 8 bit Laser RIN $-160$ dB/Hz
    Baud rate 56 Gbaud PD responsibility 0.65 A/W
    Tx bandwidth (3 dB) 25 GHz PD dark current 10 nA
    Rx bandwidth (3 dB) 35 GHz PD thermal noise 20 pA/Hz
    IL of $90^\circ~$ optical hybrid 1.2 dB IL of coupler 0.15 dB
    IL of polarizer 0.2 dB IL of PBS 0.5 dB
  • Table 2  

    Table 2Comparison of 224 Gbit/s PDM-PAM4 signals with different SVRs

    SVR scheme Main devices Noise fluctuation System performance Receiver sensitivity
    (@ different SOP) variation (@7% FEC) (dBm)
    (@ fixed ROP) (dB)
    2*Receiver A $\frac{{\gamma~~=~0.5}}{{\gamma~~=~0.7}}$ 1 hybrid+ 2 Medium 1.7 $-3.5$
    BPDs+2 PDs Low 0.2 $-3.2$
    Receiver B 1 hybrid+4 PDs High 2.7 $-2.8$
    2*Receiver C 1 wave plate+3
    polarizers+4 PDs
    2*Receiver D 1 2$\times$2 coupler +1
    3$\times$3 coupler+4 PDs