SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 64 , Issue 7 : 179105(2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9823-4

Predicting accepted pull requests in GitHub

More info
  • ReceivedJun 26, 2018
  • AcceptedDec 29, 2018
  • PublishedApr 15, 2021


There is no abstract available for this article.


This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB1004202), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61672078), and State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment (Grant No. SKLSDE- 2018ZX-12).


[1] Gousios G, Zaidman A, Storey M A, et al. Work practices and challenges in pull-based development: The integrators perspective. In: Proceedings of the 37th ICSE, Florence, 2015. 1--11. Google Scholar

[2] Yu Y, Wang H, Yin G. Reviewer recommendation for pull-requests in GitHub: What can we learn from code review and bug assignment?. Inf Software Tech, 2016, 74: 204-218 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Yu Y, Yin G, Wang T. Determinants of pull-based development in the context of continuous integration. Sci China Inf Sci, 2016, 59: 080104 CrossRef Google Scholar

[4] Zanjani M B, Kagdi H, Bird C. Automatically Recommending Peer Reviewers in Modern Code Review. IIEEE Trans Software Eng, 2016, 42: 530-543 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Chen T Q, Guestrin C. Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD'16, New York, 2016. 785--794. Google Scholar

[6] Weißgerber P, Neu D, Diehl S. Small patches get in In: Proceedings of MSR, Leipzig, 2008. 67--75. Google Scholar

[7] Pham R, Singer L, Liskin O, et al. Creating a shared understanding of testing culture on a social coding site. In: Proceedings of ICSE, San Francisco, 2013. 112--121. Google Scholar

[8] Gousios G, Pinzger M, Deursen A. An exploratory study of the pull-based software development model. In: Proceedings the 36th ICSE, Hyderabad, 2014. 345--355. Google Scholar

[9] Xia X, David L, Wang X Y, et al. A comparative study of supervised learning algorithms for re-opened bug prediction. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR). New York: IEEE, 2013. 331--334. Google Scholar


Contact and support