SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 62 , Issue 12 : 229203(2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9756-9

Natural gait analysis for a biped robot: jogging vs. walking

More info
  • ReceivedAug 22, 2018
  • AcceptedJan 15, 2019
  • PublishedNov 4, 2019


There is no abstract available for this article.


This work was partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51729501).


Appendixes A–C.


[1] Matsuoka K. Mechanisms of frequency and pattern control in the neural rhythm generators. Biol Cybernetics, 1987, 56: 345-353 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] McGeer T. Passive Dynamic Walking. Int J Robotics Res, 1990, 9: 62-82 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Goswami A, Espiau B, Keramane A. Limit cycles in a passive compass gait biped and passivity-mimicking control laws. Autonomous Robots, 1997, 4: 273-286 CrossRef Google Scholar

[4] Chen Z, Iwasaki T, Zhu L. Feedback Control for Natural Oscillations of Locomotion Systems Under Continuous Interactions With Environment. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2015, 23: 1294-1306 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Khan U I, Chen Z. Natural oscillation in compass-gait biped robots. In: Proceedings of 2016 Australian Control Conference, 2016. 13. Google Scholar

[6] Koop D, Wu C Q. Passive Dynamic Biped Walking-Part I: Development and Validation of an Advanced Model. J Comput NOnlinear Dynam, 2013, 8: 041007 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Khan U I, Chen Z. Natural oscillation gait in humanoid biped locomotion. IEEE Trans Control Syst Tech, 2018. Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    (Color online) (a) Profile of leg angle in sinusoid; (b) normal force profile for walking and jogging gaits; protectłinebreak (c) natural frequency analysis with respect to gait type.