SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 63 , Issue 3 : 139201(2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9655-4

The existence of Zeno behavior and its application to finite-time event-triggered control

More info
  • ReceivedJun 1, 2018
  • AcceptedOct 31, 2018
  • PublishedDec 23, 2019


There is no abstract available for this article.


This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61573036, 61174057).


Appendixes A–E.


[1] Tabuada P. Event-Triggered Real-Time Scheduling of Stabilizing Control Tasks. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2007, 52: 1680-1685 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] Yu H, Hao F. Input-to-state stability of integral-based event-triggered control for linear plants. Automatica, 2017, 85: 248-255 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Borgers D P, Heemels W P M H. Event-Separation Properties of Event-Triggered Control Systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2014, 59: 2644-2656 CrossRef Google Scholar

[4] Postoyan R, Tabuada P, Nesic D. A Framework for the Event-Triggered Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2015, 60: 982-996 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Lamperski A, Ames A D. Lyapunov Theory for Zeno Stability. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2013, 58: 100-112 CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Yu S, Wang Y, Jin L. Comments on 'Finite-time consensus of multi-agent system via non-linear event-triggered control strategy'. IET Control Theor Appl, 2017, 11: 1658-1661 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Li S, Zhu Y, Luo X. Finite-time consensus of multi-agent system via nonlinear event-triggered control strategy. IET Control Theor Appl, 2015, 9: 2548-2552 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Bhat S P, Bernstein D S. Finite-Time Stability of Continuous Autonomous Systems. SIAM J Control Opt, 2000, 38: 751-766 CrossRef Google Scholar

[9] Khalil H. Nonlinear Systems. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2002. Google Scholar