SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 61 , Issue 5 : 058102(2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9181-4

A non-alternate 3D structure and its practical security evaluation against differential and linear cryptanalysis

More info
  • ReceivedJan 12, 2017
  • AcceptedJun 21, 2017
  • PublishedNov 21, 2017


There is no abstract available for this article.


This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61272488, 61402523, 61672031). We would like to thank the anonymous referees for their patience and constructive suggestions.


Appendixes A and B.


[1] Nakahara J. 3D: a three-dimensional block cipher. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cyptgoloy and Network Security. Berlin: Springer, 2008. 252--267. Google Scholar

[2] Finding Impossible Differentials for Rijndael-like and 3D-like Structures. KSII TIIS, 2013, 7: 509-521 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Daemen J, Rijmen V. AES proposal: rijndael. 1999. http://csrc.nist.gov/archive/aes/rijndael/Rijndael-ammended.pdf. Google Scholar

[4] Liu H, Jin C. Lower Bounds of Differential and Linear Active S-boxes for 3D-like Structure. Comput J, 2015, 58: 904-921 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Daemen J, Knudsen L R, Rijmen V. Linear frameworks for block ciphers. Dess Codes Cryptography, 2001, 22: 65-87 CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Daemen J, Rijmen V. Security of a wide trail design. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cryptology in India, Hyderabad, 2002. 1--11. Google Scholar

[7] Sajadieh M, Mirzaei A, Mala H. A new counting method to bound the number of active S-boxes in Rijndael and 3D. Des Codes Cryptogr, 2017, 83: 327-343 CrossRef Google Scholar