SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 59 , Issue 8 : 080105(2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-5598-5

Petri net based test case generation for evolved specification

More info
  • ReceivedApr 25, 2016
  • AcceptedMay 29, 2016
  • PublishedJul 18, 2016


Funded by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(61210004)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(61572441)



This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61210004, 61572441).


[1] Tahat L H, Bader A, Vaysburg B, et al. Requirement based automated black-box test generation. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Chicago, 2001. 489--495. Google Scholar

[2] Korel B, Tahat L H, Vaysburg B. Model based regression test reduction using dependence analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. Los Alamitos: IEEE, 2002. 214--223. Google Scholar

[3] Jiang B, Tse T H, Grieskamp W, et al. Regression testing process improvement for specification evolution of real-world protocol software. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Quality Software, Zhangjiajie, 2010. 62--71. Google Scholar

[4] Garey M R, Johnson D S. Computers and Intractability: a Guide to the Theory of NP-completeness. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1979. Google Scholar

[5] Ding Z H, Jiang M Y. Model driven synthesis of behavioral models from textual use cases. Inform Control Automat Robot, 2011, 132: 713-717 CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Cockburn A. Writing Effective Use Cases. Upper Saddle River: Addison-Wesley, 2001. Google Scholar

[7] Somé S. Petri nets based formalization of textual use cases. Technical Report TR-2007-11. University of Ottawa, 2007. Google Scholar

[8] Ding Z H, Jiang M Y, Zhou M C. Generating Petri net-based behavioral models from textual use cases and application in railway networks. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2016, doi: 10-717 Google Scholar

[9] Sinha A, Amit P, Clay W. On generating EFSM models from use cases, scenarios and state machines. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Scenarios and State Machines. Washington, DC: IEEE, 2007. 1. Google Scholar

[10] Singh S K, Gupta R, Sabharwal S, et al. Automatic extraction of events from textual requirements specification. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing, Coimbatore, 2009. 415--420. Google Scholar

[11] Myers G J. The Art of Software Testing. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2011. Google Scholar

[12] Plasil F, Vladimir M. Use cases: assembling ``whole picture'' behavior. TR 02/11. Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, 2011. Google Scholar

[13] Biswas S, Mall R, Satpathy M, et al. Regression test selection techniques: a survey. Informatica, 2011, 35: 289-321 Google Scholar

[14] Engstrom E, Runeson P, Skoglund M. A systematic review on regression test selection techniques. Inform Softw Technol, 2010, 52: 14-30 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Yoo S, Harman M. Regression testing minimization, selection and prioritization: a survey. Softw Test Verif Reliab, 2012, 22: 67-120 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Panigrahi C R, Mall R. Model-based regression test case prioritization. ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes, 2010, 35: 6-120 Google Scholar

[17] Rothermel G, Harrold M J. A safe, efficient regression test selection technique. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol, 1997, 6: 173-210 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] von Mayrhauser A, Zhang N. Automated regression testing using DBT and Sleuth. J Softw Maint, 1999, 11: 2-210 Google Scholar

[19] Graves T L, Harrold M J, Kim J-M, et al. An empirical study of regression test selection techniques. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol, 2001, 10: 184-208 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Chakrabarti S K, Srikant Y N. Specification based regression testing using explicit state space enumeration. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, Tahiti, 2006. 20. Google Scholar

[21] Farooq Q, Iqbal M, Malik Z I, et al. An approach for selective state machine based regression testing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Advances in Model-Based Testing. New York: ACM, 2007. 44--52. Google Scholar

[22] Naslavsky L, Ziv H, Richardson D J. A model-based regression test selection technique. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Maintenance, Edmonton, 2009. 515--518. Google Scholar

[23] Chen Y P, Probert R L, Sims D P. Specification-based regression test selection with risk analysis. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, Indianapolis, 2002. 1. Google Scholar

[24] Briand L C, Labiche Y, He S. Automating regression test selection based on UML designs. Inf Softw Technol, 2009, 51: 16-30 CrossRef Google Scholar

[25] Tao C Q, Li B X, Gao J. A systematic state-based approach to regression testing of component software. J Softw, 2013, 8: 560-571 Google Scholar

[26] Orso A, Harrold M J, Rosenblum D, et al. Using component metacontents to support the regression testing of component-based software. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, Florence, 2001. 716--725. Google Scholar

[27] Zheng J, Robinson B, Williams L, et al. Applying regression test selection for COTS-based applications. In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Shanghai, 2006. 512--521. Google Scholar


Contact and support