logo

SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 59 , Issue 11 : 112213(2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-015-5465-9

Output performance optimization for RTD fluxgate sensor based on dynamic permeability

More info
  • ReceivedJul 29, 2015
  • AcceptedSep 2, 2015
  • PublishedSep 30, 2016

Abstract


Funded by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(41274183)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(40904053)

Science and Technology Development Major Project of Jilin Province(20140203015GX)

. We also thank the Key Laboratory of Geo-Exploration Instrumentation(Jilin University)


Acknowledgment

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41274183, 40904053), and Science and Technology Development Major Project of Jilin Province (Grant No. 20140203015GX). We also thank the Key Laboratory of Geo-Exploration Instrumentation (Jilin University) Ministry of Education for their additional assistance.


References

[1] Andò B, Baglio S, Bulsara A R, et al. RTD fluxgate: a low power nonlinear device to sense weak magnetic fields. IEEE Instrum Meas Mag, 2005, 8: 64-73 Google Scholar

[2] Primdahl F. The fluxgate magnetometer. J Phys E: Sci Instrum, 1979, 12: 241-253 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Zhang H G, Wang Y C, Song Z. Absolute stabilization of singular systems with ferromagnetic hysteresis nonlinearity. Sci China Inf Sci, 2013, 56: 078201-253 Google Scholar

[4] Sivasubramanian S, Widom A, Srivastava Y. Equivalent circuit and simulations for the landau-khalatnikov model of ferroelectric hysteresis. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Control, 2003, 50: 950-957 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Luo W, Liu S. Fitting the curve of magnetic hysteresis loop of ferromagnetic material of fluxgate. Metallic Funct Mater, 2008, 15: 30-32 Google Scholar

[6] Ripka P, Butta M, Fan J, et al. Sensitivity and noise of wire-core transverse fluxgate. IEEE Trans Magn, 2010, 46: 654-657 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Eyal W, Eugene P. Noise investigation of the orthogonal fluxgate employing alternating direct current bias. J Appl Phys, 2011, 109: 07E529-657 Google Scholar

[8] Héctor T, Juan C, Mairée R, et al. Analysis of the fluxgate response through a simple spice model. Sensor Actuat, 1999, 75: 1-7 CrossRef Google Scholar

[9] Geiler A L, Harris V G, Vittoria C, et al. A quantitative model for the nonlinear response of fluxgate magnetometers. J Appl Phys, 2006, 99: 08B316-7 Google Scholar

[10] Andò B, Baglio S, Bulsara A, et al. RTD fluxgate behavioral model for circuit simulation. In: Proceedings of Eurosensors XXIV Conference. Linz: Elsevier Press, 2010. 1288--1291. Google Scholar

[11] Andò B, Baglio S, Bulsara A R, et al. SPICE simulation of coupled core fluxgate magnetometers. In: Proceedings of Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. Binjiang: IEEE Press, 2011. 1--5. Google Scholar

[12] Andò B, Baglio S, Bulsara A R, et al. Adaptive modeling of hysteretic magnetometers. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 2012, 61: 1361-1367 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Andò B, Baglio S, Sacco V, et al. Effects of driving mode and optimal material selection on a residence times difference-based fluxgate magnetometer. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 2005, 54: 1366-1373 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Yin C, Jia Z, Ma W C, et al. Modeling and analysis of nano-sized GMRs based on Co, NiFe and Ni materials. Sci China Inf Sci, 2014, 57: 022404-1373 Google Scholar

[15] Andò B, Ascia A, Baglio S, et al. Towards an optimal readout of a RTD fluxgate magnetometer. Sensor Actuat A Phys, 2008, 142: 73-79 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Canepa F, Chirafici S, Napolentano M, et al. Nonlinear effects in the ac magnetic susceptibility of selected magnetic materials. J Alloy Compd, 2007, 442: 142-145 CrossRef Google Scholar

[17] Wang Y, Wu S, Zhou Z, et al. Research on the dynamic hysteresis loop model of the residence times difference (RTD)-fluxgate. Sensors, 2013, 13: 11539-11552 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Andò B, Baglio S, Bulsara A R, et al. Investigation on optimal materials selection in RTD-fluxgate design. In: Proceedings of Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. Ottawa: IEEE Press, 2005. 1261--1265. Google Scholar

[19] Andò B, Baglio S, Bulsara A R, et al. ``Residence times difference'' fluxgate magnetometers. IEEE Sensor J, 2005, 5: 895-904 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Bulsara A R, Seberino C, Gammaitoni L, et al. Signal detection via residence-time asymmetry in noisy bistable devices. Phys Rev E, 2003, 67: 016120-904 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Andò B, Baglio S, Bulgan A R, et al. A new readout strategy for fluxgate sensor. In: Proceedings of Instrumentation and Measurement Conference. Vail: IEEE Press, 2003. 600--604. Google Scholar

[22] Nikitin A, Stocks N G, Bulsara A R. Signal detection via residence times statistics: noise-mediated minimization of the measurement error. Phys Rev E, 2003, 68: 036133-904 CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Andò B, Baglio S, Bulsara A R, et al. ``Residence times difference'' fluxgate. Measurement, 2005, 38: 89-112 CrossRef Google Scholar

[24] Stewart M, Cain M G. Ferroelectric Hysteresis Measurement {&} Analysis. NPL Report CMMT(A). 1999. Google Scholar

[25] Lei C, Wang R, Zhou Y, et al. MEMS micro fluxgate sensors with mutual vertical excitation coils and detection coils. Micro Syst Tech, 2009, 15: 969-972 CrossRef Google Scholar

[26] Chiesi L, Kejik P, Janossy B, et al. Planar 2D micro-fluxgate sensor. Sens Actuat A Phys, 2000, 82: 174-180 CrossRef Google Scholar

[27] Andò B, Baglio S, Pitrone N, et al. Noise effects in RTD fluxgate. IEEE Sensor J, 2005, 4: 935-938 Google Scholar

qqqq

Contact and support