logo

SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, Volume 59 , Issue 9 : 092105(2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-015-5387-6

vSpec: workload-adaptive operating system specialization for virtual machines in cloud computing

More info
  • ReceivedJan 14, 2015
  • AcceptedMar 27, 2015
  • PublishedAug 23, 2016

Abstract


Funded by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(61272129)

National High-Tech Research Program of China(2013AA01A213)

New Century Excellent Talents Program of the Ministry of Education of China(NCET-12-0491)

Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(LR13F020002)

Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province(2012C01037-1)


Acknowledgment

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61272129), National High-Tech Research Program of China (Grant No. 2013AA01A213), New Century Excellent Talents Program of the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. NCET-12-0491), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. LR13F020002) and Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2012C01037-1).


References

[1] Bhatia S, Consel C, Le Meur A, et al. Automatic specialization of protocol stacks in operating system kernels. In: Proceedings of 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, Florida, 2004. 152--159. Google Scholar

[2] Gonina E, Kannan A, Shafer J, et al. Fay: extensible distributed tracing from kernels to clusters. In: Proceedings of ACM 23rd ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Cascais, 2011. 5--20. Google Scholar

[3] Makris K, Ryu K D. Dynamic and adaptive updates of non-quiescent subsystems in commodity operating system kernels. ACM SIGOPS Operat Syst Rev, 2007, 41: 327-340 Google Scholar

[4] Zhang Y, Bhargava B. Self-learning disk scheduling. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 2009, 21: 50-65 Google Scholar

[5] Anderson T E. The case for application-specific operating systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems, Key Biscayne, 1992. 92--94. Google Scholar

[6] Butrico M, Da Silva D, Krieger O, et al. Specialized execution environments. ACM SIGOPS Operat Syst Rev, 2008, 42: 106-107 Google Scholar

[7] Peter S, Li J, Zhang I, et al. Arrakis: the operating system is the control plane. In: Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Broomfield, 2014. 1--16. Google Scholar

[8] Hu L, Schwan K, Gulati A, et al. Net-cohort: detecting and managing vm ensembles in virtualized data centers. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Autonomic Computing, San Jose, 2012. 3--12. Google Scholar

[9] Mishra A K, Hellerstein J L, Cirne W, et al. Towards characterizing cloud backend workloads: insights from google compute clusters. ACM SIGMETRICS Performa Eval Rev, 2010, 37: 34-41 Google Scholar

[10] Lin Y D, Lu C N, Lai Y C, et al. Application classification using packet size distribution and port association. J Netw Comput Appl, 2009, 32: 1023-1030 Google Scholar

[11] Zander S, Nguyen T, Armitage G. Automated traffic classification and application identification using machine learning. In: Proceedings of 30th IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, Sydney, 2005. 250--257. Google Scholar

[12] Karagiannis T, Papagiannaki K, Faloutsos M. BLINC: multilevel traffic classification in the dark. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev, 2005, 35: 229-240 Google Scholar

[13] Rao J, Bu X, Xu C Z, et al. VCONF: a reinforcement learning approach to virtual machines auto-configuration. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM international conference on Autonomic computing, Barcelona, 2009. 137--146. Google Scholar

[14] Jiang H, Moore A W, Ge Z, et al. Lightweight application classification for network management. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet Network Management, Kyoto, 2007. 299--304. Google Scholar

[15] Zhang J, Figueiredo R J. Application classification through monitoring and learning of resource consumption patterns. In: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, Rhodes Island, 2006. 10--19. Google Scholar

[16] Zhang J, Figueiredo R J. Autonomic feature selection for application classification. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing, Dublin, 2006. 43--52. Google Scholar

[17] Zhao X, Yin J, Chen Z, et al. Workload classification model for specializing virtual machine operating system. In: Proceedings of 6th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), Santa Clara, 2013. 343--350. Google Scholar

[18] Consel C, Hornof L, Marlet R, et al. Tempo: specializing systems applications and beyond. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR), 1998, 30: 19-240 Google Scholar

[19] Engler D R, Kaashoek M F. Exokernel: an operating system architecture for application-level resource management. ACM SIGOPS Operat Syst Rev, 1995, 29: 251-266 Google Scholar

[20] Bershad B N, Chambers C, Eggers S, et al. SPIN---an extensible microkernel for application-specific operating system services. ACM SIGOPS Operat Syst Rev, 1995, 29: 74-77 Google Scholar

[21] Schatzberg D, Cadden J, Krieger O, et al. A way forward: enabling operating system innovation in the cloud. In: Proceedings of the 6th USENIX conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing, Philadelphia, 2014. 4. Google Scholar

[22] Iturbe X, Benkrid K, Erdogan A T, et al. R3TOS: a reliable reconfigurable real-time operating system. In: Proceedings of 2010 NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems (AHS), California, 2010. 99--104. Google Scholar

[23] Hoffmann H, Maggio M, Santambrogio M D, et al. Seec: A General and Extensible Framework for Self-Aware Computing. Technical Report MIT-CSAIL-TR-2011-046. 2011. Google Scholar

[24] Rossbach C J, Currey J, Silberstein M, et al. PTask: operating system abstractions to manage GPUs as compute devices. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Cascais, 2011. 233--248. Google Scholar

[25] Panneerselvam S, Swift M M. Chameleon: operating system support for dynamic processors. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 2012, 47: 99-110 Google Scholar

[26] Madhavapeddy A, Mortier R, Rotsos C, et al. Unikernels: library operating systems for the cloud. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, New York, 2013. 461--472. Google Scholar

[27] Kivity A, Laor D, Costa G, et al. OSv---optimizing the operating system for virtual machines. In: Proceedings of the 2014 USENIX conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Berkeley, 2014. 61--72. Google Scholar

[28] Seltzer M, Small C. Self-monitoring and self-adapting operating systems. In: Proceedings of The Sixth Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, Cape Cod, 1997. 124--129. Google Scholar

[29] Lee C T, Lin J M, Hong Z W, et al. An application-oriented Linux kernel customization for embedded systems. J Inf Sci Eng, 2004, 20: 1093-1107 Google Scholar

[30] Saez J C, Prieto M, Fedorova A, et al. A comprehensive scheduler for asymmetric multicore systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Computer Systems, New York, 2009. 139--152. Google Scholar

[31] McNamee D, Walpole J, Pu C, et al. Specialization tools and techniques for systematic optimization of system software. ACM Trans Comput Syst, 2001, 19: 217-251 Google Scholar

[32] Soules C A N, Appavoo J, Hui K, et al. System support for online reconfiguration. In: Proceedings of USENIX Annual Technical Conference, General Track, San Antonio, 2003. 141--154. Google Scholar

[33] Oberthür S, Böke C, Griese B. Dynamic online reconfiguration for customizable and self-optimizing operating systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Embedded Software, New Jersey, 2005. 335--338. Google Scholar

[34] Soror A A, Minhas U F, Aboulnaga A, et al. Automatic virtual machine configuration for database workloads. ACM Trans Database Syst (TODS), 2010, 35: 1-47 Google Scholar

[35] Pu C, Autrey T, Black A, et al. Optimistic incremental specialization: Streamlining a commercial operating system. ACM SIGOPS Operat Syst Rev, 1995, 29: 314-321 Google Scholar

[36] Burda R, Seger J. A tool framework for generation of application optimized communication protocols. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference, Halifax, 2005. 282--286. Google Scholar

[37] Bhatia S, Consel C, Le Meur A, et al. Automatic specialization of protocol stacks in operating system kernels. In: Proceedings of 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, Florida, 2004. 152--159. Google Scholar

[38] Marinos I, Watson R N M, Handley M. Network stack specialization for performance. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on SIGCOMM, Chicago, 2014. 175--186. Google Scholar

[39] Liu L B, Jia W, Yin S Y, et al. ReSSIM: a mixed-level simulator for dynamic coarse-grained reconfigurable processor. Sci China Inf Sci, 2013, 56: 062402-321 Google Scholar

[40] Wang Y S, Liu L B, Yin S Y, et al. Hierarchical representation of on-chip context to reduce reconfiguration time and implementation area for coarse-grained reconfigurable architecture. Sci China Inf Sci, 2013, 56: 112401-321 Google Scholar

[41] Domeniconi C, Gunopulos D. Incremental support vector machine construction. In: Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, San Jose, 2001. 589--592. Google Scholar

[42] Ciliendo E, Kunimasa T. Linux Performance and Tuning Guidelines. San Jose: IBM International Technical Support Organization, 2007. 77--135. Google Scholar

[43] Vavilapalli V K, Murthy A C, Douglas C, et al. Apache Hadoop Yarn: yet another resource negotiator. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Cloud Computing, New York, 2013. 5:1--5:16. Google Scholar

[44] Cao B, Yin J, Deng S, et al. A highly efficient cloud-based architecture for large-scale STB event processing: industry article. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, New York, 2012. 314--323. Google Scholar

qqqq

Contact and support