logo

European Physical Journal B, Volume 27 , Issue 3 : 385-392(2002) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2002-00169-x

Investigation of excitation energies and Hund's rule in open shell quantum dots by diffusion Monte Carlo

More info
  • ReceivedNov 20, 2001
  • PublishedJul 19, 2021
PACS numbers

Abstract


References

[1] Meirav U., Kastner M.A., Wind S.J.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1990, 65: 771 Google Scholar

[2] Ashoori R.C., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1992, 68: 3088 Google Scholar

[3] Tarucha S., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77: 3613 Google Scholar

[4] Austing D.G., et al. Phys. Rev., 1999, 60: 11514 Google Scholar

[5] Yannouleas C., Landman U.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999, 82: 5325 Google Scholar

[6] Reusch B., Häusler W., Grabert H.. Phys. Rev. B., 2001, 63: 113313 Google Scholar

[7] Koskinen M., Manninen M., Reimann S.M.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997, 79: 1389 Google Scholar

[8] Hirose K., Wingreen N.S.. Phys. Rev. B, 1999, 59: 4604 Google Scholar

[9] Pederiva F., Umrigar C.J., Lipparini E.. Phys. Rev. B, 2000, 62: 8120 Google Scholar

[10] Reimann S.M., Koskinen M., Manninen M.. Phys. Rev. B., 2000, 62: 8108 Google Scholar

[11] Maksym P.A., Chakraborty T., Eto M.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1990, 65: 108 Google Scholar

[12] Wojs A., Hawrylak P.. Phys. Rev. B, 1996, 53: 10841 Google Scholar

[13] Koskinen M., Manninen M., Mottelson B., Reimann S.M.. Phys. Rev. B, 2001, 63: 205323 Google Scholar

[14] Manninen M., Viefers S., Koskinen M., Reimann S.M.. Phys. Rev. B., 2001, 64: 245322 Google Scholar

[15] Varga K., Navratil P., Usukura J., Suzuki Y.. Phys. Rev. B, 2001, 63: 205308 Google Scholar

[16] Egger R., Häusler W., Mak C.H., Grabert H.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999, 82: 3320 Google Scholar

[17] Harting J., Mülken O., Borrmann P.. Phys. Rev. B, 2000, 62: 3320 Google Scholar

[18] The $\vert L\!=\!0,S\!=\!0\rangle$ state of the N=4 dot was the only one that did not agree, for reasons that we do not understand Since the DMC energy was the lower one for this state, the discrepancy cannot be due to the fixed-node error. Google Scholar

[19] Fock V., Darwin C.G.. Z. Phys., 1928, 47: 446 Google Scholar

[20] Puente A., Serra Ll.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999, 83: 3266 Google Scholar

[21] Umrigar C.J., Nightingale M.P., Runge K.J.. J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 99: 2865 Google Scholar

[22] Anderson J.B.. J. Chem. Phys., 1975, 63: 1499 Google Scholar

[23] Ortiz G., Ceperley D.M., Martin R.M.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1993, 71: 2777 Google Scholar

[24] Bolton F.. Phys. Rev., 1996, 54: 4780 Google Scholar

[25] See W.M.C., Foulkes R.Q., Hood R.J.. Phys. Rev. B, 1999, 60: 4558 Google Scholar

[26] Ballone P., Umrigar C.J., Delaly P.. Phys. Rev. B, 1992, 45: 6293 Google Scholar

[27] Huang C., Filippi C.J.. J. Chem. Phys., 1998, 108: 8838 Google Scholar

[28] Umrigar C.J., Wilson K.G., Wilkins J.W.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1988, 60: 1719 Google Scholar

[29] Tanatar B., Ceperley D.M.. Phys. Rev. B, 1989, 39: 5005 Google Scholar

[30] The HF approximation gives oscillations that are a bit too large for atomic densities as well. See, e.g., C. Filippi, X. Gonze, C.J. Umrigar, Recent Developments and Applications of Density Functional Theory, edited by J.M. Seminario (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996). Google Scholar

qqqq

Contact and support